INTRAVITREAL BEVACIZUMAB (AVASTIN) THERAPY FOR PERSISTENT DIFFUSE DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA

Retina ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 26 (9) ◽  
pp. 999-1005 ◽  
Author(s):  
CHRISTOS HARITOGLOU ◽  
DANIEL KOOK ◽  
ALJOSCHA NEUBAUER ◽  
ARMIN WOLF ◽  
SIEGFRIED PRIGLINGER ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
Vol 227 (2) ◽  
pp. 95-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
Güngör Sobaci ◽  
Gökhan Özge ◽  
Cüneyt Erdurman ◽  
Hakan A. Durukan ◽  
Zeki M. Bayraktar

Ophthalmology ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 116 (8) ◽  
pp. 1488-1497.e1 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Fernando Arevalo ◽  
Juan G. Sanchez ◽  
Lihteh Wu ◽  
Mauricio Maia ◽  
Arturo A. Alezzandrini ◽  
...  

Retina ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 28 (8) ◽  
pp. 1053-1060 ◽  
Author(s):  
DANIEL KOOK ◽  
ATMIN WOLF ◽  
THOMAS KREUTZER ◽  
ALJOSCHA NEUBAUER ◽  
RUPERT STRAUSS ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 (1) ◽  
pp. 10
Author(s):  
M.M El Shafei ◽  
A Pai ◽  
M Al Hashimi ◽  
F Warid ◽  
M Farouk

2010 ◽  
Vol 224 (4) ◽  
pp. 258-264 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas C. Kreutzer ◽  
Rashid Al Saeidi ◽  
Daniel Kook ◽  
Armin Wolf ◽  
Michael W. Ulbig ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 251584142098821
Author(s):  
Alicia Pareja-Ríos ◽  
Elena de Armas-Ramos ◽  
Ana Aldea-Perona ◽  
Sergio Bonaque-González

Purpose: To report the 12-month results of laser (treatment G1) versus intravitreal bevacizumab combined with laser (treatment G2) in patients with diffuse diabetic macular edema (DME). Methods: In this single-center randomized independent controlled trial, 32 patients were randomized to G1 ( n = 15) or G2 ( n = 17). In G1, laser was given at baseline and then pro re nata (PRN). In G2, three intravitreal bevacizumab (1.25 mg) injections were given once every 6 weeks, then laser and then PRN. Analysis was performed by treatment as administered. This study was registered in clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01572350 and EU Clinical Trial Registry as 2009-014654-15. Results: G2 was superior to G1 improving best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) with respect baseline (+8.0 vs + 3.0; p < 0.01). At month 12, a significantly greater proportion of patients had a BCVA letter score >15 and >73 in G2 (3 of 15 (20%) and 8 of 15 (53%), respectively) versus G1 (1 of 17 (6%) and 4 of 18 (23%), respectively). Health-related quality of life, assessed through National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire, at 12 months was statistically indistinguishable between both groups. Conclusion: G2 provided superior visual acuity gains over G1 in patients with visual impairment due to center-involving diffuse DME, associated with significant gains in VFQ-25 scores.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document