Letter to the Editor on “Open Reduction Is Associated With a Greater Hazard of Early Reoperation After Internal Fixation of Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures in Adults 18–65 Years”

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (11) ◽  
pp. e434-e434
Author(s):  
Sheng-hui Wu ◽  
Jiong Mei
2012 ◽  
Vol 94 (21) ◽  
pp. 1921-1928 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ghazi Khalil Chammout ◽  
Sebastian Simon Mukka ◽  
Thomas Carlsson ◽  
Gustaf Fredrik Neander ◽  
André Wilhelm Helge Stark ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
R Morris ◽  
A Krishna ◽  
H Hamid ◽  
M Chawda ◽  
H Mumtaz

Abstract Aim The treatment of impacted or un-displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly osteoporotic patient is still largely debated, with arthroplasty versus internal fixation two surgical options1. Our aim was to retrospectively review patients over the age of 80 with un-displaced intracapsular hip fractures who had undergone internal fixation and assess their rate of mortality and revision surgery. Method We conducted a retrospective review of all patients with femoral neck fractures over a 4-year period between January 2015 to December 2018. We refined this to only patients over the age of 80 with un-displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures fixed with cannulated screws. We noted their mental and mobility status, their follow-up attendance over 3 years, their mortality and rate of revision surgery. Results There were a total of 1232 femoral neck fractures in a 4-year period. Of these, 37 were >80 with un-displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures, with 23 fixed with cannulated screws and 14 with a Dynamic Hip Screw. Mean age – 85, M:F (1:4.75). All patients were either Garden Classification Type I or II. 4% had cognitive impairment. All patients were independently mobile. 83% were followed up for 3 years, with 1 patient (4%) undergoing revision surgery 3 years following cannulated screw fixation. The 30-day mortality rate was 5%. Conclusions The treatment choice for un-displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures in the elderly remains debateable. Our retrospective review shows that the rate of re-operation is low in patients who have undergone fixation with cannulated screws and so this remains a viable option.


2010 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 87-87
Author(s):  
Martin J. Heetveld ◽  
Cecilia Rogmark ◽  
Frede Frihagen ◽  
John Keating

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document