Open reduction via posterior triceps sparing approach in comparison with closed treatment of posteromedial displaced Gartland type III supracondylar humerus fractures

2008 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 171-178 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cem Nuri Aktekin ◽  
Ali Toprak ◽  
Akif Muhtar Ozturk ◽  
Murat Altay ◽  
Bulent Ozkurt ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (07) ◽  
pp. 41-45
Author(s):  
Dr.Ravi Kiran.N ◽  
Dr.Sreenivasa Reddy ◽  
Dr.Reshma Kota ◽  
Dr.Saketh Kolla

2018 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 133-141
Author(s):  
Barak Rinat ◽  
Eytan Dujovny ◽  
Noam Bor ◽  
Nimrod Rozen ◽  
Guy Rubin

Objective High-grade pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures are commonly treated with closed reduction and internal fixation with percutaneous pinning. When this fails, open reduction followed by internal fixation is the widely accepted procedure of choice. Use of a lateral external fixator was recently described as an optional procedure, but evidence is scarce. Methods We investigated the outcomes of upper limbs treated by either open reduction with internal fixation or closed reduction and external fixation. Results Twenty-one patients completed the long-term follow-up; 11 underwent open reduction, and 10 underwent external fixation. Most patients in both groups reported excellent satisfaction. In both groups, the modified Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score was extremely low and the average elbow range of motion was almost identical. Radiographic analysis consisting of Baumann’s angle and the carrying angle revealed no statistical difference between the two groups. Discussion Optional treatment using a linear external fixator for complex nonreducible supracondylar humerus fractures yielded acceptable clinical and radiographic results, as with open reduction. Our sample size was small, but the promising results may assist in the implementation of an alternative surgical procedure, especially in more complicated cases involving flexion-type fractures or severe soft tissue damage and swelling.


2020 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisa Emanuelli ◽  
Ognjen Stevanovic ◽  
Jeffrey Klott ◽  
Mason Uvodich ◽  
Ashley Sherman ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 567-572 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas D. Fletcher ◽  
Jonathan R. Schiller ◽  
Sumeet Garg ◽  
Amanda Weller ◽  
A. Noelle Larson ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mustafa Caner Okkaoglu ◽  
Fırat Emin Ozdemir ◽  
Erdi Ozdemir ◽  
Mert Karaduman ◽  
Ahmet Ates ◽  
...  

Abstract Background We aimed to determine the ideal surgical timing in the first 24 hours after admission to the hospital of pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures (SHF) that do not require emergent intervention. Materials and Methods Patients who underwent surgery in our institution between January 2011 and January 2019 due to pediatric Gartland type 3 SHFs were evaluated retrospectively. Open fractures, fractures associated with vascular injury and compartment syndrome, flexion type fractures were excluded. A total of 150 Gartland type 3 were included. The effect of early (<12 hours) or late (>12 hours) surgical interventions, daytime or night-time surgeries, working or non-working hour surgeries on operative parameters (operative duration and open reduction rate, reduction quality on postoperative early radiographs) were evaluated in pediatric SHFs. Results Early (<12 hours) or late (>12 hours), daytime or nighttime, working or non-working hour surgeries were found to be similar in Gartland type 3 patients regarding early postoperative reduction quality, duration of surgery, open reduction rate (p>0.05). Mean times passed from first admission to hospital until surgery were longer in working hour, late (>12 hours) and daytime surgery groups than non-working hour, early (<12 hours) and night-time surgery groups (p<0.001). Conclusion Although delaying the operation to the working hours seems to prolong the time until surgery in pediatric Gartland type 3 SHF patients who do not require emergent intervention such as open fractures, neurovascular impairment and compartment syndrome, there may not be a time interval that makes a difference for the patients if surgery is performed within the first 24 hours, thus the surgery could be scheduled according to the surgeons’ preference. Level of Evidence: Level 3, Retrospective cohort study


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document