Minimally Invasive Nail Insertion Technique for Subtrochanteric Femur Fractures

2008 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 118-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hassan R. Mir ◽  
T A. Russell
Injury ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 46 (6) ◽  
pp. 1036-1041 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Mingo-Robinet ◽  
Miguel Torres-Torres ◽  
María Moreno-Barrero ◽  
Juan Antonio Alonso ◽  
Sara García-González

2021 ◽  
pp. 77-79
Author(s):  
Nilabh Kumar ◽  
Laljee Chaudhary ◽  
Debarshi Jana

Background:The proximal femoral nail (PFN) used as an intramedullary device for the treatment of fractures. Objectives: Study was taken to analyse the union of the subtrochanteric fracture, internally xed with PFN. Materials and Methods: Study was conducted in the Department of Orthopaedics, DMCH, Laheriasarai, Bihar from June 2019 to November 2019. Individuals with acute subtrochanteric femur fractures >18 years were included in the study. The patient was positioned supine on the fracture table under spinal or epidural or general anesthesia as the condition of the patient permitted. Pre-operatively one dose of antibiotic was also administered. The fracture was reduced by longitudinal traction on fracture table and the limb was placed in neutral or slight adduction to facilitate nail insertion through the greater trochanter ; P <0.05 was considered statistically signicant. Results: At the end of ve months, all except three patients could mobilise independently; statistically there was signicant difference (P<0.05). Based on Harris Hip score obtained 3 patients outcome was excellent, 18 patients were good and 4 patients had fair outcome. Conclusion: Minimal exposure, better stability and early mobilization are the advantages with PFN. Fractures united in all cases and postoperative functional outcome was satisfactory. PFN could be a preferred implant of choice in treating subtrochanteric fractures especially in elderly.


2015 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. e7-e11 ◽  
Author(s):  
José A. Herrera-Soto ◽  
Robert Meuret ◽  
Jonathan H. Phillips ◽  
Daniel J. Vogel

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin Li ◽  
Wenqi Liu ◽  
Yiyuan Chen ◽  
Yan Zhou ◽  
Jiaxin Liang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background : Subtrochanteric femur fractures of children usually recover slower than the intertrochanteric femur fracture and tends to increas the rate of deformity. The difference among treatment options in postoperative pain level should be considered as a crucial factor while tailoring patients’ therapeutic schedules, but has not been paid enough attention to. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the postoperative pain level of hip spica casting, abduction brace and skin traction as assisted fixation to operative interventions. Methods Forty-seven children with subtrochanteric femur fractures on one side were admitted and divided into three groups according to the different assisted fixation they received. Operating time, intraoperative blood loss, follow-up time, postoperative fixation time, days in hospital, time to union, Harris scores, CHEOPS scores (before treatment, after treatment and at the last follow-up time) and VAS scores (before treatment, after treatment and at the last follow-up time) were collected. Results No significant difference of demographic characteristics data was found between the three groups before treatment(P > 0.05). After treatment and at the last follow-up time, the CHEOPS scores and the VAS scores of the three groups were all significantly lower than before(P > 0.05). But there is still no difference between the three groups(P > 0.05). Conclusion Hip spica casting, skin traction and abduction brace have the same ability to relieve the pain of subtrochanteric femur fractures in children.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document