Geriatric Physiotherapeutic Approach for Intertrochanteric Fracture- A Case Report

Hip fractures are a growing concern around the world as the geriatric population increases rapidly. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of proximal femoral nailing on elderly. Despite the fact that intertrochanteric fracture fixation is generally successful, treatment is difficult when fixation fails. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of an evidence-based protocol designed for the treatment of failed intertrochanteric fractures. When treating an unstable intertrochanteric fracture, there is a lesser risk of implant failure and reoperation, as well as a better postoperative functional recovery is seen. But in some rare cases some implant failures are major and requires a long-term treatment. Intertrochanteric femur fractures, particularly those with unstable patterns, are increasingly being treated with intramedullary implants. Despite the widespread use of nails in the treatment of these fractures, perspectives on the proper length of an intramedullary nail differ. Long nails were created to alleviate the risk of diaphyseal fracture that came with prior short nail designs. The main aim is to govern the unstable nail fixation of the intertrochanteric femoral fractures.

Comparative study between proximal femoral nailing versus dynamic hip screw in unstable inter-trochanteric fractures of the femur in adults

Background: Hip fractures are more common in elderly among them intertrochanteric fractures are most common, more than 50% fractures are unstable. The proximal femoral nailing (PFN) and dynamic hip screw (DHS) are frequently used modalities from last two decades in both stable and unstable fractures. The DHS has been shown to produce good results but complications are frequent, particularly in unstable inter-trochanteric fracture. The advantage of PFN fixation is that it provides a more biomechanically stable construct with good collapse control. The goal of this study was to compare the clinical and radiographical results of the DHS and PFN for the treatment of inter-trochanteric hip fractures as one is load bearing another is load shearing.Methods: In our study we included 70 inter-trochanteric fractures, out of which 40 were treated with DHS fixation and 30 were treated with PFN, and were followed up at regular intervals of 2 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months and annually thereafter.Results: The functional results were assessed with Harris hip score and observed 35% excellent results in DHS group and 63.3% excellent results in PFN group. We observed no statistically significant difference between two groups in view of late and early complications and time to union. We observed significantly better outcomes in PFN group for unstable inter-trochanteric fractures and in unstable fractures reduction loss was significantly lower in PFN group. We observed total duration of surgery was significantly lower in PFN group.Conclusions: We concluded that PFN may be the better fixation device for most unstable inter-trochanteric fractures.

The radiographic relationship between the cortical overlap view (COV) and the tip of the greater trochanter

For proximal femoral nailing, choosing the proper entry point with the aid of C-arm imaging is crucial. Therefore, obtaining accurate radiological views that facilitate sound identification of the tip of the greater trochanter (GT) is of utmost importance. The aim of this study was to define a radiological view characterised by reproducible radiographic landmarks which will allow the reliable identification of the tip of the GT in the anteroposterior view. Anatomical and radiographic features of 16 cadaveric femurs were analysed. The cortical overlap view (COV), characterised by the radiological overlap of the density line of the piriform fossa and the intertrochanteric crest, was identified. It marks the rotation of the proximal femur at which the GT can be accurately identified and used to determine the desired entry point for a proximal femoral nail. Trainees and fully qualified orthopedic trauma surgeons were asked to identify the correct COV in radiological imaging series. Mean internal rotation of the femur to achieve a COV was 17.5° (range 12.8°–21.8°). In the COV the tip of the GT is the highest visible point and the mean distance from the cortical overlap line to the tip of the GT is 4.45 mm. Intra- and inter-rater reliability was high with ICC(2,k) = 0.932 and ICC(2,k) = 0.987 respectively. Trainees achieved higher rates of correct COV identification than specialists. There was no significant correlation between the internal rotation of the femur to achieve the COV and femoral antetorsion. In conclusion, the COV is a highly reproducible radiological view that is characterised by radiographic landmarks easy to recognise. It allows for accurate identification of the tip of the GT, which can be used by the surgeon as a reference to determine the desired entry point for an intramedullary nail.

A PROSPECTIVE COMPARISON OF THE PROXIMAL FEMORAL NAIL VERSUS THE PROXIMAL FEMORAL LOCKING PLATE IN SUBTROCHANTERIC FEMORAL FRACTURES.

BACKGROUND: Subtrochanteric fractures account for 10% to 30% of all hip fractures. The fractures were repaired with a variety of implants. Direct anatomic reduction or indirect reduction and bridge plating procedures are also possible with the proximal femoral locking plate (PFLP). Proximal femoral nails (PFN) have been demonstrated to be superior to other implants due to biomechanical advantages. The goal of this study was to compare the radiological and functional outcomes of subtrochanteric fractures treated with the proximal femoral nail (PFN) and the proximal femoral locking plate (PFLP), in order to determine which implant was the best t for the specic fracture pattern. METHODS: 50 patients with a Subtrochanteric femur fracture were operated on and treated with a proximal femoral nail and a proximal femoral locking plate (25 in each group). A 24-month follow-up was completed. The Harris Hip Score (HHS) and radiological results were used to determine the outcome. When compared to patients treated wit RESULTS: h a proximal femoral locking plate, individuals treated with proximal femoral nailing required considerably less time to achieve complete weight bearing. In patients treated with a proximal femoral locking plate, radiological union was considerably delayed compared to patients treated with proximal femoral nailing. The average HHS in the nailing group was slightly higher than in the plating group. PFN have the advantage by taking less operative time, high rate of union, mi CONCLUSION: nimal soft tissue damage, less infection rate and early postoperative rehabilitation. In our research, we discovered that both PFN and PFLP can be utilised successfully to treat Subtrochanteric fractures. In terms of anatomical alignment, limb length disparity, postoperative infection, and, most critically, the nal Harris Hip Score, there was no signicant difference between implants.