INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE PEELING VERSUS INVERTED FLAP TECHNIQUE FOR TREATMENT OF FULL-THICKNESS MACULAR HOLES

Retina ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 38 ◽  
pp. S73-S78 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stanislao Rizzo ◽  
Ruggero Tartaro ◽  
Francesco Barca ◽  
Tomaso Caporossi ◽  
Daniela Bacherini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Internal Limiting Membrane ◽  
Full Thickness ◽  
Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling ◽  
Membrane Peeling ◽  
Flap Technique ◽  
Macular Holes

scholarly journals Comparative efficacy evaluation of inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique and internal limiting membrane peeling in large macular holes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Shen ◽  
Xiaoqin Lin ◽  
Luyi Zhang ◽  
Miaoqin Wu
Keyword(s):  
Sensitivity Analysis ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Internal Limiting Membrane ◽  
Ilm Peeling ◽  
Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling ◽  
Membrane Peeling ◽  
Visual Outcomes ◽  
Flap Technique ◽  
Macular Holes

Abstract Background The purpose of this study was to compare the anatomical and visual outcomes of inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap technique and internal limiting membrane peeling in large macular holes (MH). Methods Related studies were reviewed by searching electronic databases of Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library. We searched for articles that compared inverted ILM flap technique with ILM peeling for large MH (> 400 μm). Double-arm meta-analysis was performed for the primary end point that was the rate of MH closure, and the secondary end point was postoperative visual acuity (VA). Heterogeneity, publication bias, sensitivity analysis and subgroup analysis were conducted to guarantee the statistical power. Results This review included eight studies involving 593 eyes, 4 randomized control trials and 4 retrospective studies. After sensitivity analysis for eliminating the heterogeneity of primary outcome, the pooled data showed the rate of MH closure with inverted ILM flap technique group was statistically significantly higher than ILM peeling group (odds ratio (OR) = 3.95, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.89 to 8.27; P = 0.0003). At the follow-up duration of 3 months, postoperative VA was significantly better in the group of inverted ILM flap than ILM peeling (mean difference (MD) = − 0.16, 95% CI = − 0.23 to 0.09; P < 0.00001). However, there was no difference in visual outcomes between the two groups of different surgical treatments at relatively long-term follow-up over 6 months (MD = 0.01, 95% CI = − 0.12 to 0.15; P = 0.86). Conclusion Vitrectomy with inverted ILM flap technique had a better anatomical outcome than ILM peeling. Flap technique also had a signifcant visual gain in the short term, but the limitations in visual recovery at a longer follow-up was found.

Conventional internal limiting membrane peeling versus temporal inverted internal limiting membrane flap for large macular holes

2019 ◽  
pp. 112067211989242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Remzi Avci ◽  
Aysegul Mavi Yildiz ◽  
Sami Yilmaz
Keyword(s):  
Case Series ◽  
Internal Limiting Membrane ◽  
Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling ◽  
Membrane Peeling ◽  
Flap Technique ◽  
Macular Holes ◽  
Complete Restoration ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Papillomacular Bundle ◽  
Group 1

Purpose: To compare the functional, anatomical, and morphological results of conventional internal limiting membrane peeling versus temporal inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique for the treatment of macular holes larger than 400 μm. Design: Retrospective, comparative case series. Methods: A total of 33 patients were included, of whom 18 were treated with internal limiting membrane peeling (Group 1) and 15 were treated with temporal inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique (Group 2). Complete ophthalmic examination, such as microperimetry and optical coherence tomography, was performed preoperatively and at 12 months after surgery. Results: The closure rates accomplished in Groups 1 and 2 were 72.2% and 100%, respectively (p = 0.036). The mean improvement in best-corrected visual acuity was logMAR 0.49 ± 0.17 in Group 1 and logMAR 0.91 ± 0.15 in Group 2 (p = 0.037). U-shaped closure was achieved in one eye in Group 1 and 12 eyes in Group 2 (p < 0.001). Complete restoration of external limiting membrane and ellipsoid zone rates were significantly higher in Group 2 (p = 0.027 and p = 0.001, respectively). Conclusion: The single-layered temporal inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique improves not only anatomical and morphological but also functional outcomes of surgery for large macular holes. Furthermore, this technique seems to minimize the risk of iatrogenic trauma to the nasal part of the fovea and the corresponding papillomacular bundle fibers.

scholarly journals Comparative efficacy evaluation of inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique and internal limiting membrane peeling in large macular holes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Shen ◽  
Xiaoqin Lin ◽  
Luyi Zhang ◽  
Miaoqin Wu
Keyword(s):  
Sensitivity Analysis ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Internal Limiting Membrane ◽  
Ilm Peeling ◽  
Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling ◽  
Membrane Peeling ◽  
Visual Outcomes ◽  
Flap Technique ◽  
Macular Holes

Abstract Background: The purpose of this study was to compare the anatomical and visual outcomes of inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap technique and internal limiting membrane peeling in large macular holes (MH). Methods: Related studies were reviewed by searching electronic databases of Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library. We searched for articles that compared inverted ILM flap technique with ILM peeling for large MH (> 400 μm). Double-arm meta-analysis was performed for the primary end point that was the rate of MH closure, and the secondary end point was postoperative visual acuity (VA). Heterogeneity, publication bias, sensitivity analysis and subgroup analysis were conducted to guarantee the statistical power. Results: This review included eight studies involving 593 eyes, 4 randomized control trials and 4 retrospective studies. After sensitivity analysis for eliminating the heterogeneity of primary outcome, the pooled data showed the rate of MH closure with inverted ILM flap technique group was statistically significantly higher than ILM peeling group (odds ratio (OR) = 3.95, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.89 to 8.27; P = 0.0003). At the follow-up duration of 3 months, postoperative VA was significantly better in the group of inverted ILM flap than ILM peeling (mean difference (MD) = -0.16, 95% CI = -0.23 to 0.09; P ＜ 0.00001). However, there was no difference in visual outcomes between the two groups of different surgical treatments at relatively long-term follow-up over 6 months (MD = 0.01, 95% CI = -0.12 to 0.15; P = 0.86). Conclusion: Vitrectomy with inverted ILM flap technique had a better anatomical outcome than ILM peeling. Flap technique also had a signifcant visual gain in the short term, but the limitations in visual recovery at a longer follow-up was found. Keywords: Inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique, Internal limiting membrane peeling, Large macular hole, Meta-analysis

scholarly journals Comparative efficacy evaluation of inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique and internal limiting membrane peeling in large macular holes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Shen ◽  
Xiaoqin Lin ◽  
Luyi Zhang ◽  
Miaoqin Wu
Keyword(s):  
Sensitivity Analysis ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Internal Limiting Membrane ◽  
Ilm Peeling ◽  
Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling ◽  
Membrane Peeling ◽  
Visual Outcomes ◽  
Flap Technique ◽  
Macular Holes

Abstract Background: The purpose of this study was to compare the anatomical and visual outcomes of inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap technique and internal limiting membrane peeling in large macular holes (MH). Methods: Related studies were reviewed by searching electronic databases of Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library. We searched for articles that compared inverted ILM flap technique with ILM peeling for large MH (> 400 μm). Double-arm meta-analysis was performed for the primary end point that was the rate of MH closure, and the secondary end point was postoperative visual acuity (VA). Heterogeneity, publication bias, sensitivity analysis and subgroup analysis were conducted to guarantee the statistical power. Results: This review included eight studies involving 593 eyes, 4 randomized control trials and 4 retrospective studies. After sensitivity analysis for eliminating the heterogeneity of primary outcome, the pooled data showed the rate of MH closure with inverted ILM flap technique group was statistically significantly higher than ILM peeling group (odds ratio (OR) = 3.95, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.89 to 8.27; P = 0.0003). At the follow-up duration of 3 months, postoperative VA was significantly better in the group of inverted ILM flap than ILM peeling (mean difference (MD) = -0.16, 95% CI = -0.23 to 0.09; P ＜ 0.00001). However, there was no difference in visual outcomes between the two groups of different surgical treatments at relatively long-term follow-up over 6 months (MD = 0.01, 95% CI = -0.12 to 0.15; P = 0.86). Conclusion: Vitrectomy with inverted ILM flap technique had a better anatomical outcome than ILM peeling. Flap technique also had a signifcant visual gain in the short term, but the limitations in visual recovery at a longer follow-up was found. Keywords: Inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique, Internal limiting membrane peeling, Large macular hole, Meta-analysis

scholarly journals Comparative efficacy evaluation of inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique and internal limiting membrane peeling in large macular holes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Shen ◽  
Xiaoqin Lin ◽  
Luyi Zhang ◽  
Miaoqin Wu
Keyword(s):  
Sensitivity Analysis ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Internal Limiting Membrane ◽  
Ilm Peeling ◽  
Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling ◽  
Membrane Peeling ◽  
Visual Outcomes ◽  
Flap Technique ◽  
Macular Holes

Abstract Background: The purpose of this study was to compare the anatomical and visual outcomes of inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap technique and internal limiting membrane peeling in large macular holes (MH). Methods: Related studies were reviewed by searching electronic databases of Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library. We searched for articles that compared inverted ILM flap technique with ILM peeling for large MH (> 400 μm). Double-arm meta-analysis was performed for the primary end point that was the rate of MH closure, and the secondary end point was postoperative visual acuity (VA). Heterogeneity, publication bias, sensitivity analysis and subgroup analysis were conducted to guarantee the statistical power. Results: This review included eight studies involving 593 eyes, 4 randomized control trials and 4 retrospective studies. After sensitivity analysis for eliminating the heterogeneity of primary outcome, the pooled data showed the rate of MH closure with inverted ILM flap technique group was statistically significantly higher than ILM peeling group (odds ratio (OR) = 3.95, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.89 to 8.27; P = 0.0003). At the follow-up duration of 3 months, postoperative VA was significantly better in the group of inverted ILM flap than ILM peeling (mean difference (MD) = -0.16, 95% CI = -0.23 to 0.09; P ＜ 0.00001). However, there was no difference in visual outcomes between the two groups of different surgical treatments at relatively long-term follow-up over 6 months (MD = 0.01, 95% CI = -0.12 to 0.15; P = 0.86). Conclusion: Vitrectomy with inverted ILM flap technique had a better anatomical outcome than ILM peeling. Flap technique also had a signifcant visual gain in the short term, but the limitations in visual recovery at a longer follow-up was found. Keywords: Inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique, Internal limiting membrane peeling, Large macular hole, Meta-analysis

scholarly journals Efficacy of Pars Plana Vitrectomy with Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Treatment of Large Idiopathic Full-Thickness Macular Holes

2021 ◽  
Vol Volume 15 ◽  
pp. 521-529
Author(s):  
Suthasinee Sinawat ◽  
Sukita Jumpawong ◽  
Tanapat Ratanapakorn ◽  
Chavakij Bhoomibunchoo ◽  
Yosanan Yospaiboon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pars Plana Vitrectomy ◽  
Internal Limiting Membrane ◽  
Full Thickness ◽  
Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling ◽  
Membrane Peeling ◽  
Macular Holes ◽  
Pars Plana

scholarly journals Comparative efficacy evaluation of inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique and internal limiting membrane peeling in large macular holes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Shen ◽  
Xiaoqin Lin ◽  
Luyi Zhang ◽  
Miaoqin Wu
Keyword(s):  
Sensitivity Analysis ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Internal Limiting Membrane ◽  
Ilm Peeling ◽  
Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling ◽  
Membrane Peeling ◽  
Visual Outcomes ◽  
Flap Technique ◽  
Macular Holes

Abstract Background: The purpose of this study was to compare the anatomical and visual outcomes of inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap technique and internal limiting membrane peeling in large macular holes (MH). Methods: Related studies were reviewed by searching electronic databases of Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library. We searched for articles that compared inverted ILM flap technique with ILM peeling for large MH (> 400 μm). Double-arm meta-analysis was performed for the primary end point that was the rate of MH closure, and the secondary end point was postoperative visual acuity (VA). Heterogeneity, publication bias, sensitivity analysis and subgroup analysis were conducted to guarantee the statistical power. Results: This review included eight studies involving 593 eyes, 4 randomized control trials and 4 retrospective studies. After sensitivity analysis for eliminating the heterogeneity of primary outcome, the pooled data showed the rate of MH closure with inverted ILM flap technique group was statistically significantly higher than ILM peeling group (odds ratio (OR) = 3.95, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.89 to 8.27; P = 0.0003). At the follow-up duration of 3 months, postoperative VA was significantly better in the group of inverted ILM flap than ILM peeling (mean difference (MD) = -0.16, 95% CI = -0.23 to 0.09; P ＜ 0.00001). However, there was no difference in visual outcomes between the two groups of different surgical treatments at relatively long-term follow-up over 6 months (MD = 0.01, 95% CI = -0.12 to 0.15; P = 0.86). Conclusion: Vitrectomy with inverted ILM flap technique had a better anatomical outcome than ILM peeling. Flap technique also had a signifcant visual gain in the short term, but the limitations in visual recovery at a longer follow-up was found. Keywords: Inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique, Internal limiting membrane peeling, Large macular hole, Meta-analysis

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document