scholarly journals Comparative efficacy evaluation of inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique and internal limiting membrane peeling in large macular holes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Shen ◽  
Xiaoqin Lin ◽  
Luyi Zhang ◽  
Miaoqin Wu
Keyword(s):  
Sensitivity Analysis ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Internal Limiting Membrane ◽  
Ilm Peeling ◽  
Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling ◽  
Membrane Peeling ◽  
Visual Outcomes ◽  
Flap Technique ◽  
Macular Holes

Abstract Background: The purpose of this study was to compare the anatomical and visual outcomes of inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap technique and internal limiting membrane peeling in large macular holes (MH). Methods: Related studies were reviewed by searching electronic databases of Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library. We searched for articles that compared inverted ILM flap technique with ILM peeling for large MH (> 400 μm). Double-arm meta-analysis was performed for the primary end point that was the rate of MH closure, and the secondary end point was postoperative visual acuity (VA). Heterogeneity, publication bias, sensitivity analysis and subgroup analysis were conducted to guarantee the statistical power. Results: This review included eight studies involving 593 eyes, 4 randomized control trials and 4 retrospective studies. After sensitivity analysis for eliminating the heterogeneity of primary outcome, the pooled data showed the rate of MH closure with inverted ILM flap technique group was statistically significantly higher than ILM peeling group (odds ratio (OR) = 3.95, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.89 to 8.27; P = 0.0003). At the follow-up duration of 3 months, postoperative VA was significantly better in the group of inverted ILM flap than ILM peeling (mean difference (MD) = -0.16, 95% CI = -0.23 to 0.09; P ＜ 0.00001). However, there was no difference in visual outcomes between the two groups of different surgical treatments at relatively long-term follow-up over 6 months (MD = 0.01, 95% CI = -0.12 to 0.15; P = 0.86). Conclusion: Vitrectomy with inverted ILM flap technique had a better anatomical outcome than ILM peeling. Flap technique also had a signifcant visual gain in the short term, but the limitations in visual recovery at a longer follow-up was found. Keywords: Inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique, Internal limiting membrane peeling, Large macular hole, Meta-analysis

scholarly journals Comparative efficacy evaluation of inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique and internal limiting membrane peeling in large macular holes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Shen ◽  
Xiaoqin Lin ◽  
Luyi Zhang ◽  
Miaoqin Wu
Keyword(s):  
Sensitivity Analysis ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Internal Limiting Membrane ◽  
Ilm Peeling ◽  
Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling ◽  
Membrane Peeling ◽  
Visual Outcomes ◽  
Flap Technique ◽  
Macular Holes

Abstract Background The purpose of this study was to compare the anatomical and visual outcomes of inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap technique and internal limiting membrane peeling in large macular holes (MH). Methods Related studies were reviewed by searching electronic databases of Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library. We searched for articles that compared inverted ILM flap technique with ILM peeling for large MH (> 400 μm). Double-arm meta-analysis was performed for the primary end point that was the rate of MH closure, and the secondary end point was postoperative visual acuity (VA). Heterogeneity, publication bias, sensitivity analysis and subgroup analysis were conducted to guarantee the statistical power. Results This review included eight studies involving 593 eyes, 4 randomized control trials and 4 retrospective studies. After sensitivity analysis for eliminating the heterogeneity of primary outcome, the pooled data showed the rate of MH closure with inverted ILM flap technique group was statistically significantly higher than ILM peeling group (odds ratio (OR) = 3.95, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.89 to 8.27; P = 0.0003). At the follow-up duration of 3 months, postoperative VA was significantly better in the group of inverted ILM flap than ILM peeling (mean difference (MD) = − 0.16, 95% CI = − 0.23 to 0.09; P < 0.00001). However, there was no difference in visual outcomes between the two groups of different surgical treatments at relatively long-term follow-up over 6 months (MD = 0.01, 95% CI = − 0.12 to 0.15; P = 0.86). Conclusion Vitrectomy with inverted ILM flap technique had a better anatomical outcome than ILM peeling. Flap technique also had a signifcant visual gain in the short term, but the limitations in visual recovery at a longer follow-up was found.

scholarly journals Comparative efficacy evaluation of inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique and internal limiting membrane peeling in large macular holes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Shen ◽  
Xiaoqin Lin ◽  
Luyi Zhang ◽  
Miaoqin Wu
Keyword(s):  
Sensitivity Analysis ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Internal Limiting Membrane ◽  
Ilm Peeling ◽  
Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling ◽  
Membrane Peeling ◽  
Visual Outcomes ◽  
Flap Technique ◽  
Macular Holes

Abstract Background: The purpose of this study was to compare the anatomical and visual outcomes of inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap technique and internal limiting membrane peeling in large macular holes (MH). Methods: Related studies were reviewed by searching electronic databases of Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library. We searched for articles that compared inverted ILM flap technique with ILM peeling for large MH (> 400 μm). Double-arm meta-analysis was performed for the primary end point that was the rate of MH closure, and the secondary end point was postoperative visual acuity (VA). Heterogeneity, publication bias, sensitivity analysis and subgroup analysis were conducted to guarantee the statistical power. Results: This review included eight studies involving 593 eyes, 4 randomized control trials and 4 retrospective studies. After sensitivity analysis for eliminating the heterogeneity of primary outcome, the pooled data showed the rate of MH closure with inverted ILM flap technique group was statistically significantly higher than ILM peeling group (odds ratio (OR) = 3.95, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.89 to 8.27; P = 0.0003). At the follow-up duration of 3 months, postoperative VA was significantly better in the group of inverted ILM flap than ILM peeling (mean difference (MD) = -0.16, 95% CI = -0.23 to 0.09; P ＜ 0.00001). However, there was no difference in visual outcomes between the two groups of different surgical treatments at relatively long-term follow-up over 6 months (MD = 0.01, 95% CI = -0.12 to 0.15; P = 0.86). Conclusion: Vitrectomy with inverted ILM flap technique had a better anatomical outcome than ILM peeling. Flap technique also had a signifcant visual gain in the short term, but the limitations in visual recovery at a longer follow-up was found. Keywords: Inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique, Internal limiting membrane peeling, Large macular hole, Meta-analysis

scholarly journals Comparative efficacy evaluation of inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique and internal limiting membrane peeling in large macular holes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Shen ◽  
Xiaoqin Lin ◽  
Luyi Zhang ◽  
Miaoqin Wu
Keyword(s):  
Sensitivity Analysis ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Internal Limiting Membrane ◽  
Ilm Peeling ◽  
Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling ◽  
Membrane Peeling ◽  
Visual Outcomes ◽  
Flap Technique ◽  
Macular Holes

Abstract Background: The purpose of this study was to compare the anatomical and visual outcomes of inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap technique and internal limiting membrane peeling in large macular holes (MH). Methods: Related studies were reviewed by searching electronic databases of Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library. We searched for articles that compared inverted ILM flap technique with ILM peeling for large MH (> 400 μm). Double-arm meta-analysis was performed for the primary end point that was the rate of MH closure, and the secondary end point was postoperative visual acuity (VA). Heterogeneity, publication bias, sensitivity analysis and subgroup analysis were conducted to guarantee the statistical power. Results: This review included eight studies involving 593 eyes, 4 randomized control trials and 4 retrospective studies. After sensitivity analysis for eliminating the heterogeneity of primary outcome, the pooled data showed the rate of MH closure with inverted ILM flap technique group was statistically significantly higher than ILM peeling group (odds ratio (OR) = 3.95, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.89 to 8.27; P = 0.0003). At the follow-up duration of 3 months, postoperative VA was significantly better in the group of inverted ILM flap than ILM peeling (mean difference (MD) = -0.16, 95% CI = -0.23 to 0.09; P ＜ 0.00001). However, there was no difference in visual outcomes between the two groups of different surgical treatments at relatively long-term follow-up over 6 months (MD = 0.01, 95% CI = -0.12 to 0.15; P = 0.86). Conclusion: Vitrectomy with inverted ILM flap technique had a better anatomical outcome than ILM peeling. Flap technique also had a signifcant visual gain in the short term, but the limitations in visual recovery at a longer follow-up was found. Keywords: Inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique, Internal limiting membrane peeling, Large macular hole, Meta-analysis

scholarly journals Comparative efficacy evaluation of inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique and internal limiting membrane peeling in large macular holes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Shen ◽  
Xiaoqin Lin ◽  
Luyi Zhang ◽  
Miaoqin Wu
Keyword(s):  
Sensitivity Analysis ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Internal Limiting Membrane ◽  
Ilm Peeling ◽  
Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling ◽  
Membrane Peeling ◽  
Visual Outcomes ◽  
Flap Technique ◽  
Macular Holes

Abstract Background: The purpose of this study was to compare the anatomical and visual outcomes of inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap technique and internal limiting membrane peeling in large macular holes (MH). Methods: Related studies were reviewed by searching electronic databases of Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library. We searched for articles that compared inverted ILM flap technique with ILM peeling for large MH (> 400 μm). Double-arm meta-analysis was performed for the primary end point that was the rate of MH closure, and the secondary end point was postoperative visual acuity (VA). Heterogeneity, publication bias, sensitivity analysis and subgroup analysis were conducted to guarantee the statistical power. Results: This review included eight studies involving 593 eyes, 4 randomized control trials and 4 retrospective studies. After sensitivity analysis for eliminating the heterogeneity of primary outcome, the pooled data showed the rate of MH closure with inverted ILM flap technique group was statistically significantly higher than ILM peeling group (odds ratio (OR) = 3.95, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.89 to 8.27; P = 0.0003). At the follow-up duration of 3 months, postoperative VA was significantly better in the group of inverted ILM flap than ILM peeling (mean difference (MD) = -0.16, 95% CI = -0.23 to 0.09; P ＜ 0.00001). However, there was no difference in visual outcomes between the two groups of different surgical treatments at relatively long-term follow-up over 6 months (MD = 0.01, 95% CI = -0.12 to 0.15; P = 0.86). Conclusion: Vitrectomy with inverted ILM flap technique had a better anatomical outcome than ILM peeling. Flap technique also had a signifcant visual gain in the short term, but the limitations in visual recovery at a longer follow-up was found. Keywords: Inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique, Internal limiting membrane peeling, Large macular hole, Meta-analysis

scholarly journals Inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique versus internal limiting membrane peeling for large macular holes: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ji-Guo Yu ◽  
Jing Wang ◽  
Yi Xiang
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Internal Limiting Membrane ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Ilm Peeling ◽  
Closure Rate ◽  
Flap Technique ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Macular Holes

Background: Vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling is an effective surgical procedure for the treatment of macular holes (MHs). However, there is a possibility of poor postoperative anatomical closure with conventional ILM peeling for MHs larger than 400 μm. Therefore, a novel inverted ILM flap technique was developed for such cases. Objectives: This meta-analysis study was performed to evaluate and compare the anatomical and visual outcomes of the inverted ILM flap technique and ILM peeling in large MHs. Methods: The Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Embase databases were searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The trial eligibility and risk of bias were assessed according to Cochrane review methods. The primary outcome measures included MH closure rate and postoperative visual acuity (VA). Subgroup analysis of postoperative VA based on follow-up time was also conducted. Pooled odds ratios (ORs), weighted mean difference (WMD), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software. Results: Five RCTs with a total of 155 eyes in the inverted ILM flap group and 161 eyes in the ILM peeling group were included in this meta-analysis. Statistical meta-analysis revealed that the overall MH closure rate in the inverted ILM flap group was significantly higher than that in the ILM peeling group (OR, 3.10; 95% CI, 1.25 to 7.66; P = 0.01). The postoperative VA was significantly better in the inverted ILM flap group than ILM peeling group (WMD, -0.14; 95% CI, -0.21 to -0.07; P = 0.0002). The subgroup meta-analysis indicated that the postoperative VA was significantly better in the inverted ILM flap group than ILM peeling group (WMD, -0.17; 95% CI, -0.26 to -0.08; P = 0.0004) at the 3-month follow-up. However, no significant difference was observed between the two groups at the 6-month follow-up (WMD, -0.09; 95% CI, -0.20 to 0.02; P = 0.10). Conclusions: Vitrectomy with inverted ILM flap technique showed a higher anatomical closure rate as well as visual gain—although only in the short-term as no difference in visual recovery was found at the 6-month follow-up—than did ILM peeling in large MHs. The inverted ILM flap technique should be considered as a preferred and routine procedure for the treatment of patients with MHs larger than 400 µm.

scholarly journals Long-Term Outcome of Vitrectomy with Suitable Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling and Air Tamponade for Highly Myopic Foveoschisis-Associated Lamellar Macular Hole

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Jia-lin Wang ◽  
Yan-ling Wang
Keyword(s):  
Macular Hole ◽  
Internal Limiting Membrane ◽  
Lamellar Macular Hole ◽  
Ilm Peeling ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling ◽  
Membrane Peeling ◽  
Myopic Foveoschisis ◽  
Air Tamponade

Purpose. To investigate the outcome of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with suitable internal limiting membrane peeling (ILM) and air tamponade for patients with highly myopic foveoschisis-associated lamellar macular hole (MH). Methods. This retrospective interventional case series included 11 patients with highly myopic foveoschisis-associated lamellar MH who underwent PPV and indocyanine green-aided ILM peeling up to the temporal vascular arcades. Following air tamponade after surgery, all patients were instructed to maintain a face-down position. The patients were followed up for over 1 year and evaluated for MH closure and the best-corrected visual acuity before and after surgery. Results. The mean ± standard deviation values of patient age, axial length, and follow-up duration were 67.82 ± 6.54 years, 29.21 ± 1.95 mm, and 24.27 ± 8.11 months, respectively. After surgery, the lamellar MH closed in all eyes, and 10 eyes showed vision improvement at the 1-month, 3-month, and final follow-up evaluations. One patient showed decreased vision at 2 years after surgery, with patchy chorioretinal atrophy in the macular region. Myopic foveoschisis showed resolution in three eyes and alleviation in eight. Ten patients underwent cataract surgery during PPV. Conclusion. Extension of ILM peeling up to the temporal vascular arcades and air tamponade after PPV may improve the visual function and rate of MH closure for patients with highly myopic foveoschisis-associated lamellar MH.

scholarly journals Comparison of Anatomical and Visual Outcomes between Idiopathic and Myopic Macular Holes Using the Internal Limiting Membrane or Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap Technique

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Federico Peralta Iturburu ◽  
Claudia Garcia-Arumi ◽  
Maria Bové Alvarez ◽  
Jose Garcia-Arumi
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Macular Hole ◽  
Small Sample Size ◽  
Internal Limiting Membrane ◽  
Small Sample ◽  
Ilm Peeling ◽  
Visual Outcomes ◽  
Macular Holes ◽  
Idiopathic Macular Holes

Purpose. To compare the results of vitrectomy with those of internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling or inverted ILM flap for treating myopic or idiopathic macular hole. Methods. Thirty-nine eyes of 39 patients undergoing vitrectomy with ILM peeling for macular hole (25 idiopathic and 14 myopic) and 27 eyes of 27 patients undergoing vitrectomy with inverted ILM flap (15 idiopathic and 12 myopic) were included. Outcome measures were macular hole closure by optical coherence tomography and visual acuity at 6 months. Results. Closure was achieved in 25 (100%) idiopathic and 12 (86%) myopic macular holes in the ILM peeling group and in 14 (93%) idiopathic and 11 (91.77%) macular holes in the inverted ILM flap group. There were no statistically significant differences in restoration of the external limiting membrane and ellipsoid zone between the groups. Median best-corrected visual acuity (logarithm of minimal angle of resolution) at the end of follow-up was 0.22 (20/32 Snellen) in idiopathic and 0.4 (20/50) in myopic (P=0.042) patients in the ILM peeling group and 0.4 (20/50) in idiopathic and 0.4 (20/50) in myopic (P=0.652) patients in the inverted ILM flap group. Conclusion. Both techniques were associated with high closure rates in myopic and idiopathic macular holes, with somewhat better visual outcomes in idiopathic cases. The small sample size may have provided insufficient power to support the superiority of one technique over the other in the two groups.

scholarly journals Effect of internal limiting membrane peeling on normal retinal function evaluated by microperimetry-3

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yue Qi ◽  
Zengyi Wang ◽  
Shi-Ming Li ◽  
Qisheng You ◽  
Xida Liang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Internal Limiting Membrane ◽  
Retinal Function ◽  
Fundus Photography ◽  
Ilm Peeling ◽  
Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling ◽  
Macular Holes ◽  
Pars Plana ◽  
Air Tamponade ◽  
23 Gauge

Abstract Background To evaluate the effect of internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling surrounding macular holes (MH) for the function of retina by microperimetry-3(MP-3). Methods This is a prospective, cohort study which included patients with MHs who were treated by 23-gauge 3-port pars plana vitrectomy and ILM peeling with air tamponade. Color fundus photography, retinal optical coherence tomography and MP-3 were performed 1 week before, 1 and 4 months after the operation. In MP-3 examination, a customized follow-up pattern with 45 spots in the central 8° visual field was used. The spots corresponding to the retina surrounding macular holes were selected for comparison of pre- and post-operative function. Results We incuded 44 eyes of 44 patients with best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 1.06±0.40 (logMAR). All eyes achieved an anatomical success at 4 months. BCVA significantly improved at 1 month (0.53±0.30, P<0.01) and 4 months (0.31±0.24, P<0.01), respectively. Mean retinal sensitivity (MRS, dB) of the retina surrounding macular hole was 23.46±3.01 dB at baseline, and significantly increased at 1 month (26.25±2.31 dB, u=-4.88, P<0.01) and 4 months(27.14±2.45 dB, t=-6.29, P<0.01). Patients with increased MRS are significantly younger than those with deceased MRS (59.72±3.22 years vs. 65.60±8.19 years, P<0.01). After ILM peeling, the increasing extent of MRS was significantly higher in inferior and nasal retina than in superior and temporal retina at 1 and 4 months (P<0.05). Conclusion ILM peeling in normal retina will not decrease the retinal function in a short-term after surgery.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document