Ridge Preservation After Maxillary Third Molar Extraction Using 30% Porosity PLGA/HA/β-TCP Scaffolds With and Without Simvastatin

2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 832-840 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miguel Noronha Oliveira ◽  
Levy Hermes Rau ◽  
Aline Marodin ◽  
Márcio Corrêa ◽  
Letícia Ruhland Corrêa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Third Molar ◽  
Ridge Preservation ◽  
Third Molar Extraction ◽  
Maxillary Third Molar ◽  
Molar Extraction

scholarly journals Palatal Injection: A Myth or a Reality in Maxillary Third Molar Extraction

2014 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-32
Author(s):  
Mukul Padhye ◽  
Vaibhav Shah ◽  
Vruturaj Shevale ◽  
Suraj Pawar ◽  
Rujuta Ajit Desai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Third Molar ◽  
Pain Scale ◽  
Injection Pain ◽  
Third Molar Extraction ◽  
Maxillary Third Molar ◽  
Injection Techniques ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
And Control ◽  
Buccal Infiltration ◽  
Molar Extraction

ABSTRACT Introduction Palatal injection, in spite of many modernized injection techniques, remains a painful experience for the patient. The aim of this study was to demonstrate if maxillary third molars could be extracted using only buccal infiltration of 2% lignocaine hydrochloride (HCl) with adrenaline 1:80,000 without the need for supplemental palatal injection. Materials and methods Three hundred patients were selected randomly and divided into two groups of 150 each. In the experimental group, 2 ml of 2% lignocaine hydrochloride with 1:80000 adrenaline was injected into the buccal vestibule of the tooth to be extracted. Extraction was performed after a waiting period of 7 minutes postinjection. Equal number of 150 patients were used as control and were subjected to the same protocol, with additional palatal injection. Pain experienced during extraction of both groups were recorded using visual analog scale and faces pain scale. Mann-Whitney test was used to analyze pain between both the groups. Results Statistical analysis of the two groups, experimental and control groups do not defer with respect to visual analog and faces pain score. Conclusion Palatal injection for extraction of maxillary third molar is not mandatory. How to cite this article Pawar S, Desai RA, Padhye M, Shevale V, Khosa R, Keswani E, Thakker S, Shah V. Palatal Injection: A Myth or a Reality in Maxillary Third Molar Extraction. World J Dent 2014;5(1):28-32.

scholarly journals Sub-Conjunctival Haemorrhage Following Maxillary Third Molar Extraction - A Rarity

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (26) ◽  
pp. 1954-1956
Author(s):  
Karthik Ragupathy ◽  
Geetha Rajendran ◽  
Sanjay Pasupathy ◽  
Ganesh Ramakrishnan ◽  
Kiruthika Shriranjani
Keyword(s):  
Rare Case ◽  
Preoperative Planning ◽  
Maxillofacial Surgery ◽  
Third Molar ◽  
Surgical Anatomy ◽  
Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Third Molar Extraction ◽  
Maxillary Third Molar ◽  
Molar Extraction

Third molar extraction remains one of the most common surgical procedures performed in dentistry either by intra-alveolar or trans alveolar methods; yet such a common surgical procedure sometimes results in relatively rare complications. The incidence of complications can be reduced by proper preoperative planning, knowledge of the surgical anatomy, good surgical technique and recognition of complications. Sub conjunctival haemorrhage after maxillary third molar extraction is one such complication, which till now not more than three cases of similar findings have been reported in the literature. The purpose of this article is to present a rare case of sub conjunctival haemorrhage after maxillary right third molar extraction in a 56-year-old female reported at The Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Sri Manakula Vinayagar Medical College and Hospital, Pondicherry, India.

Effect of Age, Gender, Side and Impaction Types on Surgical Difficulty During Mandibular Third Molar Extraction.

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 11
Author(s):  
Krishna Gopal Bhuju ◽  
Sujita Shrestha ◽  
Riwaj Karki ◽  
Sameer Aryal
Keyword(s):  
Third Molar ◽  
Objective Measure ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Third Molar Extraction ◽  
Mandibular Third Molar ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
Surgical Difficulty ◽  
Effect Of Age ◽  
Molar Extraction

<p><strong>Aim</strong>: To study the effect of age, gender, side and impaction types on surgical difficulty during mandibular third molar extraction through the data collected over a period of one year by single maxillofacial surgeon. All the extractions were performed under the same environment and conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods</strong>: Descriptive clinical study of 401 patients was carried out between the ages of 16 to 45years. Age, gender, impaction side and impaction types (according to the winter classification) were recorded on proforma. Duration of surgery for each patient was recorded after starting incision to the completion of suture which was divided into less than 10 minutes (mild), 11 to 20 minutes (moderate) and above 21 minutes (severe). Pearson’s Chi-square test was used for data analysis and significance level was less than or equal to 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results</strong>: Among 401 participants, 225 (56.1%) were male and 176 (43.9%) were female. Mean age was 31.5 years and mean operation time was 17.59 minutes. After statistical analysis there was a significant correlation among gender and side of impaction where <em>p </em>value is 0.043 0.048 respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion</strong>: There is a statistically significant correlation between gender and side of impaction with duration of surgery which is considered as the objective measure of surgical difficulty whereas age and impaction types didn’t show any significant correlation. </p>

scholarly journals Parasympathetic effect of deep pressure input on third molar extraction in adolescents

2019 ◽  
Vol 118 (9) ◽  
pp. 1317-1324 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hsin-Yung Chen ◽  
Hsiang Yang ◽  
Huang-Ju Chi ◽  
Hsin-Ming Chen
Keyword(s):  
Third Molar ◽  
Third Molar Extraction ◽  
Deep Pressure ◽  
Molar Extraction
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document