scholarly journals MP64-16 ELUCIDATION OF URINARY INCONTINENCE MECHANISM AFTER ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY BY ANATOMICAL AND FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS OF THE URETHRAL SUPPORT MECHANISM

2021 ◽  
Vol 206 (Supplement 3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Masao Kataoka ◽  
Akihisa Hasegawa ◽  
Yuki Harigane ◽  
Syunta Makabe ◽  
Kei Yaginuma ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Tae Young Shin ◽  
Yong Seong Lee

Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) has largely replaced open radical prostatectomy as the standard surgical treatment for prostate cancer. However, postoperative urinary incontinence still persists and has a significant impact on quality of life. We report the superior results of the detrusorrhaphy technique during RARP that helps achieve early continence. Our prospective study involved 95 consecutive patients who underwent RARP between March 2015 and May 2017; fifty patients underwent RARP using the new detrusorrhaphy technique (group 1) and 45 underwent standard RARP (group 2). The postoperative oncological and functional outcomes were compared between the two groups. The postoperative continence was assessed at 0 day, 1 week, 4 weeks, 8–12 weeks, and 6 months after catheter removal. Continence was defined as the use of no pad over a 24 h period. Mean operative time in groups 1 and 2 were 250 and 220 min, respectively. Intraoperative complications were not encountered in any patient. The continence rates after catheter removal in groups 1 and 2 were 68% and 0% at 0 day, 78% and 17.8% at 1 week, 86% and 64.4% at 4 weeks, 92% and 73.3% at 8–12 weeks, and 100% and 91.1% at 6 months, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, the nerve sparing technique, D’Amico risk groups, and prostate volume were involved in the early recovery of urinary continence. The detrusorrhaphy technique is simple, safe, and feasible, which helped achieve earlier continence. It showed significantly better outcomes than those achieved with the standard RARP technique in terms of urinary incontinence. Nevertheless, our findings need to be validated in further studies.


Author(s):  
Masashi Honda ◽  
Bunya Kawamoto ◽  
Shuichi Morizane ◽  
Katsuya Hikita ◽  
Kuniyasu Muraoka ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document