Accidental Epidural Catheter Removal Rates and Strength Required for Disconnection: a Retrospective Cohort and Experimental Study

Background: Epidural analgesia requires the use of epidural catheters, which are associated with certain risks such as accidental epidural catheter removal, including dislodgement and disconnection. Few studies have investigated accidental catheter removal rates and directly compared them among epidural connector types. This study aimed to examine the differences in accidental catheter removal rates associated with different catheter connector types and to experimentally determine the linear tensile strength required to induce disconnection in each connector type.Methods: This retrospective cohort study included adult patients who underwent elective surgery and received patient-controlled epidural analgesia between December 2019 and August 2020. Patients were divided into groups according to the type of catheter connection used: standard (old group), new standard (new group), and new standard with taping (taping group). Furthermore, we prepared 60 sets of epidural catheters and connectors comprising 20 sets for each of the old, new, and taping groups, and used the digital tension meter to measure the maximum tensile strength required to induce disconnection. A multinomial logistic regression analysis was used to examine risk factors for disconnection. The experimental study groups were compared using one-way analysis of variance.Results: The clinical study involved in 920 patients (360, 182, and 378 patients in the old, new, and taping group, respectively). Dislodgement rates were similar among the three groups. Disconnection was most likely to occur in the new group (5.5%) and least likely to occur in the taping group (0.3%) compared to the old group (1.9%). However, the new group was not a risk factor for disconnection. The experimental study identified tensile strengths of 12.41 N, 12.06 N, and 19.65 N in the old, new, and taping groups, respectively. Comparison tests showed a significant difference in the tensile strength required for disconnection between the new and taping groups but not between the new and old groups.Conclusions: These findings suggest that taping the catheter connector connection may reduce the risk of disconnection, and thereby help improve patient outcomes. Further studies are required to clarify other parameters that may affect patient safety in this context.

Characteristics Analysis, Clinical Outcome and Risk Factors for Fungal Peritonitis in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients: A 10-Year Case-Control Study

Background: Fungal peritonitis (FP) is a rare but severe complication that can appear in patients receiving peritoneal dialysis (PD). This study aimed to investigate the incidence rate and clinical characteristics of FP, evaluate clinical outcomes between FP and bacterial peritonitis (BP) patients on PD, and especially estimate the risk factors for FP outbreak.Methods: All episodes of FP diagnosed in our hospital from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2020, were reviewed in this single-center study. FP cases were analyzed and compared with patients diagnosed with BP in a 1:6 ratio matching for case-control study. Patient information, including clinical information, biochemical analysis, and outcomes, was recorded. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression model were used to analyze the risk factors for FP.Results: A total of 15 FP episodes were observed in 15 PD patients, with an FP rate of 0.0071 episodes per patient-year. Seventeen strains of fungi were isolated and identified. Candida was the most common pathogen (15 strains, 88.2%), followed by Aspergillus fumigatus (2 strains, 11.8%). Between the groups, FP group showed a higher rate of HD transfer and catheter removal, and a lower rate of PD resumption in the short-term outcome (all P < 0.01), while no significant difference in the mortality was noted during the whole study period. The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that longer PD duration (odds ratio [OR] 1.042, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.012–1.073, P < 0.01), higher serum potassium (OR 3.373, 95% CI 1.068–10.649, P < 0.05), elevated estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (OR 1.845, 95% CI 1.151–2.955, P < 0.05), reduced serum albumin level (OR 0.820, 95% CI 0.695–0.968, P < 0.05) and peritoneal effluent polymorphonuclear (PMN) count (OR 0.940, 95%CI 0.900–0.981, P < 0.01) were significantly increased the risk for FP.Conclusion: These results suggested that FP leads to higher rate of catheter removal and HD transfer, and a lower rate of PD resumption than BP, and that additional attention should be paid to hypoalbuminemia, increased serum potassium, long PD duration, and low peritoneal effluent PMN in PD patients.

Rate of Postoperative Urinary Retention After Anterior Compartment Prolapse Surgery: a Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Early Versus Conventional Transurethral Catheter Removal

Purpose To compare the rate of postoperative urinary retention (POUR) after anterior prolapse surgery between early transurethral catheter removal (24 hours postoperatively) and our standard practice (on postoperative day 3)Methods We conducted a randomized controlled trial among patients undergoing anterior compartment prolapse surgery between 2020 and 2021 at a university hospital. Women were randomized into two groups. After removal, if the second void residual urine volume exceeded 150 mL, POUR was diagnosed and intermittent catheterization was performed. The primary outcome was the POUR rate. The secondary outcomes included urinary tract infection, asymptomatic bacteriuria (AB), time to ambulation, time to spontaneous voiding, length of hospitalization, and patient satisfaction.Results Sixty-eight women were enrolled. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics, intraoperative blood loss, operative time, anesthetic modalities, opioid use, and complications. The overall POUR rate was 29.4%. The POUR rate in the conventional group was 18.2% higher than that in the early-removal group; however, this was not statistically significant. (32.4% vs. 26.5%, RR 0.82; 95% CI: 0.39–1.72). There was no significant difference between groups for postoperative AB rate (14.7 vs. 0%, p=0.053). The early-removal group had shorter lengths of hospital stay (1 day vs. 3 days, p<0.001) and 3.8 hours earlier time to ambulation (p=0.2), without significant differences in postoperative patient satisfaction. Conclusion Among patients undergoing anterior compartment prolapse surgery, early catheter removal was comparable in POUR rate to conventional treatment, with shorter hospitalization. Therefore, early transurethral catheter removal is preferable following anterior compartment prolapse surgery. Clinical trial registration number thaiclinicaltrials.org, TCTR20210309003, 09 March 2021, retrospectively registered.

A case of Sphingomonas paucimobilis causing peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis and review of the literature

Background Peritoneal dialysis (PD)-associated peritonitis caused by Sphingomonas paucimobilis (S. paucimobilis) is very rare, and most of the characteristics of such cases are still unknown. Case presentation An 80-year-old Japanese woman on PD was diagnosed with PD-associated peritonitis and received ceftazidime and cefazolin. The number of cells in the peritoneal dialysate decreased quickly. However, because S. paucimobilis was detected, the antibiotic was changed to meropenem according to the susceptibility test results. She was treated with meropenem for two weeks and discharged. After 21 days, she was hospitalized for relapsing peritonitis. S. paucimobilis was detected again, and improvement after the administration of meropenem was poor, eventually resulting in catheter removal. Conclusions S. paucimobilis may be resistant to empirical antibiotics; furthermore, catheter removal may still be required, even with sensitive-antibiotic treatment.

Correlation of Urine Loss after Catheter Removal and Early Continence in Men Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy

Background: To determine the correlation between urine loss in PAD-test after catheter removal, and early urinary continence (UC) in RP treated patients. Methods: Urine loss was measured by using a standardized, validated PAD-test within 24 h after removal of the transurethral catheter, and was grouped as a loss of <1, 1–10, 11–50, and >50 g of urine, respectively. Early UC (median: 3 months) was defined as the usage of no or one safety-pad. Uni- and multivariable logistic regression models tested the correlation between PAD-test results and early UC. Covariates consisted of age, BMI, nerve-sparing approach, prostate volume, and extraprostatic extension of tumor. Results: From 01/2018 to 03/2021, 100 patients undergoing RP with data available for a PAD-test and early UC were retrospectively identified. Ultimately, 24%, 47%, 15%, and 14% of patients had a loss of urine <1 g, 1–10 g, 11–50 g, and >50 g in PAD-test, respectively. Additionally, 59% of patients reported to be continent. In multivariable logistic regression models, urine loss in PAD-test predicted early UC (OR: 0.21 vs. 0.09 vs. 0.03; for urine loss 1–10 g vs. 11–50 g vs. >50 g, Ref: <1 g; all p < 0.05). Conclusions: Urine loss after catheter removal strongly correlated with early continence as well as a severity in urinary incontinence.

The Impact of Catheter Removal Time on Urinary Continence and Overactive Bladder Symptoms After Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Retrospective Analysis of Consecutive 250 Cases From a Single Institution

Background After radical prostatectomy, the optimal length of postoperative catheterization time remains to be determined. This study investigates the impact of catheter removal time on urinary continence and overactive bladder symptoms after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).Methods Two hundred and fifty consecutive patients underwent RARP by a single surgeon between November 2020 and May 2021. Time to catheter removal was categorized into 7, 10, and ≥ 14 days. Continence was defined as no more than 1 pad used or no more than 20 grams of urine leakage per 24 hours. The patients' continence rates and overactive bladder symptom score (OABSS) were assessed at 48 hours, 1 week, 4 weeks, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks after catheter removal.Results Overall, continence rates were 36% 48 hours after catheter removal, 55.6% 1 week, 74.8% 4 weeks, 98.4% 12 weeks, and 100% 24 weeks after catheter removal. The median time to regain continence was 1 week. After stratification according to catheterization time, no significant difference in continence rates was found between different groups at each time point after catheter removal. Longer catheterization was not an independent predictor of continence recovery (10 days: OR 0.985, 95% CI 0.689-1.409, p = 0.936; ≥14 days: OR 1.194, 95% CI 0.869-1.642, p = 0.274). The presence of diabetes was associated with worse continence outcomes (OR 1.535, 95% CI 1.105-2.132, p = 0.011). The mean OABSS of patients in the continent group were significantly lower than the incontinent group at 48 hours, 1 week, and 4 weeks after catheter removal. No significant difference in OABSS was found between different catheterization time groups at each time point after catheter removal.Conclusions Our results demonstrated that different catheterization time (7 days, 10 days, ≥14 days) is not associated with short-, intermediate-, long-term continence outcomes or overactive bladder symptoms.