Therapeutic Approaches to Secondary Fracture Prevention in High Risk Populations

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. e104-e114
Author(s):  
Huei-Wen Lim ◽  
Melissa Chamblain ◽  
Benny Wong ◽  
Siddharth Raghavan
2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kendal L Hamann ◽  
Malini Chandra ◽  
Rita L Hui ◽  
Catherine Lee ◽  
Mehreen M Khan ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND: Fracture events in older adults are important opportunities for secondary prevention. In response to national (HEDIS) quality metrics in 2008, our medical group implemented a fracture prevention program, identifying women age ≥65y who experienced a fracture and targeting them for osteoporosis screening or treatment within six months. In 2015, we added an outreach program for “high-risk secondary fracture prevention” targeting women age 60-85y and men age 70-85y for osteoporosis therapy within 6 months after a hip, pelvic, humerus, wrist or vertebral fracture. This study examines whether targeting “high-risk fracture” in women and men results in higher treatment rates following a non-vertebral major osteoporotic fracture. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted using data from women age 60-85y and men age 70-85y who experienced a fracture of the hip, humerus, and wrist in 2013-2014 (Cohort 1, the era of our HEDIS-only program) or 2015-2016 (Cohort 2, the era of our added “high-risk secondary fracture prevention” program). We excluded patients with primary bone disorders or metastatic cancer and those with osteoporosis treatment in the year prior to fracture. Osteoporosis drug therapy (oral/IV bisphosphonates, denosumab, raloxifene or teriparatide) initiated within six months after the fracture date was assessed. Differences between groups were compared using the chi-squared test, and multivariable logistic regression was used to examine predictors of treatment. RESULTS: There were 5727 (Cohort 1) and 6469 (Cohort 2) adults identified with hip, humerus, or wrist fracture (high risk fracture). Wrist fracture was the most prevalent fracture in women and hip fracture the most prevalent in men. Osteoporosis treatment initiation within 6 months of the fracture date was achieved for 38% of women and 13% of men in Cohort 1 and 37% of women and 25% of men in Cohort 2. Among women age 60-64, treatment increased from 14% (Cohort 1) to 25% (Cohort 2). Overall, fracture in the later era (2015-2016) was associated with a slightly lower odds of post fracture treatment initiation (adjusted odds ratio OR 0.8, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.7-0.9) in women 65-85y; however, a much higher odds of treatment was seen (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.9-2.9) for men 70-85y. Older age, hip fracture, and past osteoporosis therapy were also associated with greater odds of treatment within 6 months. CONCLUSION: Targeted high-risk fracture intervention resulted in a 2-fold increase in osteoporosis treatment after major non-vertebral osteoporotic fracture in men 70-85y and women 60-64y, the demographic subgroups not previously targeted by HEDIS-based intervention. However, treatment of fractures in women already targeted by HEDIS-based intervention did not increase. Future studies should address potential barriers to treatment and assess the impact of added high-risk fracture outreach on adherence to therapy.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 215145932098540
Author(s):  
Bailey R. Abernathy ◽  
Lisa K. Schroder ◽  
Deborah C. Bohn ◽  
Julie A. Switzer

Introduction: A need exists for improved care pathways for patients experiencing low-energy pelvic ring fractures. A review of the current literature was performed to understand the typical patient care and post-acute rehabilitation pathway within the US healthcare system. We also sought to summarize reported clinical outcomes worldwide. Significance: Low-energy pelvic ring fracture patients usually do not qualify for inpatient admission, yet they often require post-acute rehabilitative care. The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ (CMS) 3-day rule is a barrier to obtaining financial coverage of this rehabilitative care. Results: Direct admission of some patients to post-acute care facilities has shown promise with decreased cost, improved patient outcomes, and increased patient satisfaction. Secondary fracture prevention programs may also improve outcomes for this patient population. Conclusions: Post-acute care innovation and secondary fracture prevention should be prioritized in the low-energy pelvic fragility fracture patient population. To demonstrate the effect and feasibility of these improved care pathways, further studies are necessary.


2020 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 145-161
Author(s):  
Robert B. Conley ◽  
Gemma Adib ◽  
Robert A. Adler ◽  
Kristina E. Åkesson ◽  
Ivy M. Alexander ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 185-186
Author(s):  
CD Beilfuss ◽  
MJ Wall ◽  
JS Graff ◽  
CR McBurney ◽  
AM Fendrick

2021 ◽  
pp. 112070002110274
Author(s):  
Gershon Zinger ◽  
Noa Sylvetsky ◽  
Yedin Levy ◽  
Kobi Steinberg ◽  
Alexander Bregman ◽  
...  

Introduction: The most successful programme for secondary fracture prevention is the FLS (fracture liaison service) model. Our orthopaedic department carried out a prospective randomised study to measure the effectiveness of a 4-step intervention programme. The findings in this study reveal important additional clinical benefits to having an orthopaedic-based FLS programme and evaluates the usefulness of fracture risk tools. Methods: We carried out a prospective study to evaluate patients with a fragility fracture of the hip. There were 2 groups, intervention and control (each 100 patients). Of these, 20 were either removed from the study or dropped out, leaving 180 for analysis. In addition to routine preoperative blood tests, albumin and thyroid function levels were obtained and PTH (parathyroid hormone) levels when indicated. The intervention group (83 patients) had a dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan performed and fracture risk (FRAX) was calculated. Results: 12 patients (6.7%) had blood results which showed a potentially treatable cause for osteoporosis and 36 (20%) had blood results that changed their medical care. FRAX scores (180 patients) showed that the major osteoporotic fracture score correctly predicted the hip fracture in only 49%. The hip fracture score correctly predicted the hip fracture in 83%. DEXA scores (65 patients) showed osteoporosis in only 46% of hips and in only 26% of spines. An abnormal FRAX score or DEXA scan would have predicted a fragility fracture 93% of the time. Conclusions: In addition to reducing secondary fractures, FLS programmes can provide fundamental benefits to the health of the patient. The intervention programme in this study identified patients with underlying treatable causes, correctable clinical conditions and patients with an unusually low bone density. When used together, FRAX and DEXA are more sensitive predictors for hip fracture risk than either are individually. Trial registry: 201497CTIL ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02239523 )


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document