Preventing Unintended Pregnancy and HIV Transmission: Dual Protection or Dual Dilemma?

2007 ◽  
Vol 34 (11) ◽  
pp. 873-875 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles S. Morrison ◽  
Willard Cates
Sexual Health ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria F. Gallo ◽  
Maggie Kilbourne-Brook ◽  
Patricia S. Coffey

The female condom remains the sole female-initiated method of dual protection against unintended pregnancy and sexually transmissible infections (STIs), including HIV. We reviewed published data on the effectiveness and acceptability of the female condom for protection against pregnancy and infection. Overall, use of the female condom is low and several barriers hinder the wider adoption of the use of the method. Research on effectiveness has focussed on pregnancy, STIs and biological markers of semen exposure. Although the data available suggest that female condoms (or a mixture of female and male condoms) may provide similar degrees of protection against pregnancy and STIs as do latex male condoms alone, this conclusion has not been demonstrated and thus comparative research is urgently needed.


2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica M. Sales ◽  
Maura K. Whiteman ◽  
Melissa J. Kottke ◽  
Tessa Madden ◽  
Ralph J. DiClemente

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kiyomi Tsuyuki ◽  
Regina María Barbosa ◽  
Adriana de Araujo Pinho

The cooccurrence of HIV and unintended pregnancy has prompted a body of work on dual protection, the simultaneous protection against HIV and unintended pregnancy. This study examines dual protection and dual methods as a risk-reduction strategy for women living with HIV. Data are from a cross-sectional sample of HIV-positive women attended in Specialized STI/AIDS Public Health Service Clinics in 13 municipalities from all five regions of Brazil 2003-2004 (N=834). Descriptive techniques and logistic regression were used to examine dual protection among women living with HIV. We expand the definition of dual protection to include consistent condom use and reversible/irreversible contraceptive methods, we test the dual methods hypothesis that women who use dual methods will use condoms less consistently than women who use only condoms, and we identify predictors of dual protection. Dual protection is common in our sample. Women who use dual methods have lower odds of consistent condom use than women who only use condoms. Among dual method users, we find that women who use an irreversible method use condoms more consistently than women who use a reversible method. Women on ART and with an HIV-serodiscordant partner have greater odds of consistent condom use than their counterparts.


2016 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 271-279 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kiyomi Tsuyuki ◽  
Jessica D Gipson ◽  
Lianne A Urada ◽  
Regina Maria Barbosa ◽  
Donald E Morisky

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Agatha K. Bula ◽  
Kendra Hatfield-Timajchy ◽  
John Chapola ◽  
L. Chinula ◽  
Stacey A. Hurst ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Although many countries have been promoting hormonal contraceptives to prevent unintended pregnancy and condom use to prevent HIV transmission, little is known about how women targeted by these messages have interpreted and internalized them. We describe HIV-positive and negative women’s understanding of the benefits of contraception and condoms and their motivations to use them. Methods This is a qualitative sub-study from a clinical trial evaluating the effects of progestin contraception on HIV-positive and negative women aged 18–45 years randomly assigned to depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) injection or levonorgestrel (LNG) implant. We purposively recruited 41 women to participate in in-depth interviews (IDIs) and focus group discussions (FGDs) after randomization into the main study. We conducted a total of 30 IDIs and 6 FGDs comprised of 4–7 women (N = 32). All women were counselled about potential risks for HIV acquisition/transmission with progestin-only contraception, drug-drug interactions between the implant and efavirenz-based ART, and the need to use condoms with their assigned contraceptive to help prevent pregnancy and HIV acquisition and transmission. Results All women understood that HIV is transmitted through unprotected sex and that HIV transmission can be prevented through condom use but not DMPA injection or LNG implant use. Nearly all HIV-positive women knew or suspected that their partners were also HIV-positive and were most interested in using condoms to prevent infection with a drug-resistant HIV strain to keep their HIV viral load low. Almost all reported that their partners agreed to condom use, but few used them consistently. Most women believed that condoms were effective at preventing both HIV and pregnancy if used consistently. Nearly all women considered contraception and condom use as important in preventing unintended pregnancy and HIV because partner disclosure of HIV status is low. Conclusion Our results showed that both HIV-positive and negative women understood modes of HIV transmission and prevention and were aware that hormonal contraceptives are only effective for preventing pregnancy and not HIV. Although both HIV-negative and positive women were motivated to use condoms to prevent both HIV acquisition and infection with other HIV strains respectively, they all faced challenges from their partners in using condoms consistently.


2014 ◽  
Vol 67 ◽  
pp. S218-S227 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia Raifman ◽  
Terusha Chetty ◽  
Frank Tanser ◽  
Tinofa Mutevedzi ◽  
Philippa Matthews ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 118 (3) ◽  
pp. 197-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark A Schmidt ◽  
Eve D Mokotoff
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document