The Impact of Postmastectomy Radiotherapy on Two-Stage Implant Breast Reconstruction

2014 ◽  
Vol 134 (4) ◽  
pp. 588-595 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter G. Cordeiro ◽  
Claudia R. Albornoz ◽  
Beryl McCormick ◽  
Qunying Hu ◽  
Kimberly Van Zee
2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (04) ◽  
pp. 264-269 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aurelia Trisliana Perdanasari ◽  
Amjed Abu-Ghname ◽  
Sarth Raj ◽  
Sebastian J. Winocour ◽  
Rene D. Largo

AbstractImplant-based reconstruction (IBR) remains the most commonly utilized breast reconstruction option for post-mastectomy patients. IBR can be approached as either a one-stage reconstruction or a two-stage reconstruction. Facilitated by improvements in surgical technology and advanced techniques, one-stage reconstruction, also known as direct-to-implant (DTI) reconstruction, involves the insertion of an implant at the time of mastectomy. The decision to pursue either a DTI or a two-stage reconstruction is based on several factors, including the patient's overall health, expected risk of postoperative complications, and associated costs to both the patient and hospital.


2019 ◽  
Vol 72 (11) ◽  
pp. 1763-1768 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jens H. Hoejvig ◽  
Nicolas J. Pedersen ◽  
Christina S. Gramkow ◽  
Rikke Bredgaard ◽  
Niels Kroman ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (05) ◽  
pp. e4-e5
Author(s):  
Luis Parra Pont ◽  
Georgios Pafitanis ◽  
Pedro Ciudad ◽  
Burak Kaya ◽  
Antonio Diaz Gutierrez

2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (05) ◽  
pp. e3-e3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Federico Lo Torto ◽  
Emanuele Cigna ◽  
Juste Kaciulyte ◽  
Donato Casella ◽  
Marco Marcasciano ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
min JI kim ◽  
Woo beom Lee ◽  
Il Jae Lee ◽  
Hyung Min Hahn ◽  
Duy Quang Thai ◽  
...  

Abstract Numerous risk factors for the complications of two-stage, immediate implant-based breast reconstruction have been identified, although few studies have directly examined the impact of breast size and expansion protocols on the surgical outcomes of breast reconstruction. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of breast size, expansion velocity, and volume-related variables on postoperative complications of breast reconstruction. The cohort involved patients who underwent immediate breast expander reconstruction at a single center between 2017 and 2019. The breast size was classified into three categories according to the weight of the mastectomy specimen as small (< 300 g), medium (≥ 300 g, ≤ 500 g), or large (> 500 g). Multifactorial logistic regressions were used to assess the impact of variables, and receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis was used to determine the optimal cut-off value for predicting the complication event. Of the 174 breasts (168 patients), 51 (29.3%), 66 (37.9%), and 57 (32.6%) breasts were classified as small, medium, and large, respectively. The rate of infection (p = 0.014) and expander/implant failure (p = 0.007) significantly differed according to breast size, with the rate being the highest in large breasts. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that body mass index (odds ratio [OR]: 1.25, p = 0.003), nipple-sparing mastectomy (OR: 2.82, p = 0.036), sentinel biopsy (OR: 5.10, p = 0.016), final expansion volume (OR: 0.99, p = 0.022), and expansion velocity (OR: 0.703, p = 0.024) were significant independent predictors of any complication. In the ROC analysis, breast weight > 696 g could predict the possibility of revision surgery, with a sensitivity of 42.9% and specificity of 81.8%. The final expansion volume and expansion velocity have a significant negative relationship with overall complications in breast reconstruction. A standard expansion protocol needs to be established to ensure the success of two-stage breast reconstruction.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document