scholarly journals Where Do We Look? Assessing Gaze Patterns in Cosmetic Face-Lift Surgery with Eye Tracking Technology

2020 ◽  
Vol 145 (2) ◽  
pp. 450e-451e
Author(s):  
Aashish Rajesh ◽  
Editt N. Taslakian ◽  
Malek Bawadkji ◽  
Mario Tarzi ◽  
Ahmad Alhamid
2019 ◽  
Vol 144 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lawrence Z. Cai ◽  
Jeffrey W. Kwong ◽  
Amee D. Azad ◽  
David Kahn ◽  
Gordon K. Lee ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 146 (6) ◽  
pp. 821e-822e
Author(s):  
Lawrence Z. Cai ◽  
Jeffrey W. Kwong ◽  
Amee D. Azad ◽  
David Kahn ◽  
Gordon K. Lee ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 145 (6) ◽  
pp. 1104e-1104e
Author(s):  
Lawrence Z. Cai ◽  
Jeffrey W. Kwong ◽  
Amee D. Azad ◽  
David Kahn ◽  
Gordon K. Lee ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 145 (6) ◽  
pp. 1103e-1104e
Author(s):  
Haydar Aslan Gülbitti ◽  
Theo Bouman ◽  
Berend van der Lei

Heart Rhythm ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (8) ◽  
pp. S356
Author(s):  
Heather Marie Giacone ◽  
Anne M. Dubin ◽  
Scott Ceresnak ◽  
Henry Chubb ◽  
William Rowland Goodyer ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Stephanie A. Whetsel Borzendowski ◽  
Alan O. Campbell

Early research on gaze patterns during human locomotion indicated that pedestrians tend to focus their gaze on the path 2 – 3 m ahead. More recent research in this area has utilized eye tracking technology to empirically assess eye movements during navigation in naturalistic environments. A similar approach to understanding personal injuries resulting in civil lawsuits has potential utility in the field of forensic human factors. The present study was conducted in the context of gathering empirical data to support expert opinions in a premises liability civil suit. Using a mobile head-mounted eye tracker, the gaze patterns of five individuals was assessed as they walked two paths covering the area where the plaintiff in the subject suit was injured. The results of this analysis indicated that, consistent with previous research, participants fixated the path ahead. Additionally, the duration of fixations on their final destination tended to be longer than fixations on other objects or areas in the forward view. The present study demonstrates the utility of empirical analysis of conditions surrounding a personal injury using eye tracking technology.


2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (9) ◽  
pp. 1022-1034
Author(s):  
Malke Asaad ◽  
Jacob K Dey ◽  
Ahmad Al-Mouakeh ◽  
Mohamad Baraa Manjouna ◽  
Mohammad A Nashed ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The use of eye-tracking technology in plastic surgery has gained popularity over the past decade due to its ability to assess observers’ visual preferences in an objective manner. Objectives The goal of this study was to provide a comprehensive review of eye-tracking studies in plastic and reconstructive surgery, which can aid in the design and conduct of high-quality eye-tracking studies. Methods Through application of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, a comprehensive search of articles published on eye-tracking across several databases was conducted from January 1946 to January 2019. Inclusion criteria included studies evaluating the use of eye-tracking technology in the field of plastic and reconstructive surgery. The resulting publications were screened by 2 independent reviewers. Results A total of 595 articles were identified, 23 of which met our inclusion criteria. The most common application of eye-tracking was to assess individuals with cleft lip/palate (9 studies). All 19 studies that evaluated fixation patterns among conditions vs controls reported significant differences between the 2 groups. Five out of 7 studies assessing visual data between preoperative and postoperative patients identified significant differences between the preoperative and postoperative groups, whereas 2 studies did not. Nine studies examined the relation between severity indices, attractiveness scores, or personality ratings and gaze patterns. Correlation was found in 7 out of the 9 studies. Conclusions This systematic review demonstrates the utility of eye-tracking technology as a quantifiable objective assessment and emerging research tool for evaluating outcomes in several domains of plastic and reconstructive surgery.


2020 ◽  
Vol 91 (6) ◽  
pp. AB113-AB114
Author(s):  
Urvi Karamchandani ◽  
Simon Erridge ◽  
Keane Evans-Harvey ◽  
Ara Darzi ◽  
Jonathan Hoare ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document