Why Primary Rhinoplasty Fails

2021 ◽  
Vol 148 (5) ◽  
pp. 1021-1027
Author(s):  
Rod J. Rohrich ◽  
Ira L. Savetsky ◽  
Yash J. Avashia
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Emrah Kağan Yaşar ◽  
Can İlker Demir ◽  
Buket Dursun ◽  
Murat Şahin Alagöz

Author(s):  
Rod J Rohrich ◽  
Ronald E Hoxworth
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (01) ◽  
pp. 072-077
Author(s):  
Neil N. Luu ◽  
Oren Friedman

AbstractRevision rhinoplasty exists because the perfect primary rhinoplasty technique does not. The benefit of revision surgery is that it offers us the opportunity to study and identify what did not work well during previous surgery. Thoughtful approaches to technique and outcomes allow us to recognize which maneuvers are dependable and worth repeating, and which are not reliable and therefore worth avoiding. As surgeons seek safer, more predictable results to improve patient outcomes, new techniques emerge which we then apply, study, and modify again, based on what works and what does not over the short term and the long term. There is no substitute for experience or for learning from trusted surgeons' experiences. Revision rhinoplasty presents many challenges including surgically induced anatomical changes, weakened structural support, a lack of available tissue for reconstruction, tissue remodeling responses, and other iatrogenic and wound healing complications. The septum, as the primary source of structural nasal integrity, forms the foundation for functional and aesthetic rhinoplasty. Herein, we describe strategies in septorhinoplasty for patients who have undergone prior nasal septal surgery.


2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (03) ◽  
pp. 435-438 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chitravelu Siva Subramanian ◽  
N. K. K. Koteswara Prasad ◽  
Arun B. Chitharanjan ◽  
Eric Jein Wein Liou

ABSTRACTNasoalveolar molding (NAM) can be done effectively to reshape the nasal cartilage and mold the maxillary dentoalveolar arch before surgical cleft lip repair and primary rhinoplasty. Presurgical NAM helps as an adjunct procedure to enhance the esthetic and functional outcome of the surgical procedures. We have developed a modified NAM device to suit to the needs of the patients coming from distant places for the treatment. This device helps in reducing the number of frequent visits the patient needs to take to the craniofacial center. The purpose of this presentation is to report this treatment technique and discuss its application.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document