18F-FDG and 18F-NaF PET/CT Findings of a Multiple Myeloma Patient With Thyroid Cartilage Involvement

2015 ◽  
Vol 40 (11) ◽  
pp. 873-876 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aylin Oral ◽  
Bulent Yazici ◽  
Özgür Ömür ◽  
Melda Comert ◽  
Guray Saydam
2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. e148-e149
Author(s):  
Tulin Firatli Tuglular ◽  
Funda Pepedil Tanrikulu ◽  
Tayfur Toptas ◽  
Asli Karadeniz ◽  
Isik Atagunduz

2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (5) ◽  
pp. 405-406
Author(s):  
Caixia An ◽  
Luoping Zhai ◽  
Huixia Geng ◽  
Pingzhi Wang ◽  
Wanchun Zhang

2016 ◽  
Vol 55 (01) ◽  
pp. N1-N3
Author(s):  
C. Ferrari ◽  
A. Niccoli Asabella ◽  
C. Altini ◽  
G. Rubini
Keyword(s):  
Fdg Pet ◽  
Pet Ct ◽  
18F Fdg ◽  

Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophia Scheubeck ◽  
Gabriele Ihorst ◽  
Katja Schoeller ◽  
Maximilian Holler ◽  
Mandy‐Deborah Möller ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 22 (7) ◽  
pp. 635-639 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miyako Morooka ◽  
Kazuo Kubota ◽  
Yuji Murata ◽  
Hitoshi Shibuya ◽  
Kimiteru Ito ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Olwen Westerland ◽  
◽  
Ashik Amlani ◽  
Christian Kelly-Morland ◽  
Michal Fraczek ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose Comparative data on the impact of imaging on management is lacking for multiple myeloma. This study compared the diagnostic performance and impact on management of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) and whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WBMRI) in treatment-naive myeloma. Methods Forty-six patients undergoing 18F-FDG PET/CT and WBMRI were reviewed by a nuclear medicine physician and radiologist, respectively, for the presence of myeloma bone disease. Blinded clinical and imaging data were reviewed by two haematologists in consensus and management recorded following clinical data ± 18F-FDG PET/CT or WBMRI. Bone disease was defined using International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria and a clinical reference standard. Per-patient sensitivity for lesion detection was established. McNemar test compared management based on clinical assessment ± 18F-FDG PET/CT or WBMRI. Results Sensitivity for bone lesions was 69.6% (32/46) for 18F-FDG PET/CT (54.3% (25/46) for PET component alone) and 91.3% (42/46) for WBMRI. 27/46 (58.7%) of cases were concordant. In 19/46 patients (41.3%) WBMRI detected more focal bone lesions than 18F-FDG PET/CT. Based on clinical data alone, 32/46 (69.6%) patients would have been treated. Addition of 18F-FDG PET/CT to clinical data increased this to 40/46 (87.0%) patients (p = 0.02); and WBMRI to clinical data to 43/46 (93.5%) patients (p = 0.002). The difference in treatment decisions was not statistically significant between 18F-FDG PET/CT and WBMRI (p = 0.08). Conclusion Compared to 18F-FDG PET/CT, WBMRI had a higher per patient sensitivity for bone disease. However, treatment decisions were not statistically different and either modality would be appropriate in initial staging, depending on local availability and expertise.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document