response evaluation
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

1312
(FIVE YEARS 367)

H-INDEX

57
(FIVE YEARS 7)

Cancers ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 320
Author(s):  
Kei Amioka ◽  
Tomokazu Kawaoka ◽  
Masanari Kosaka ◽  
Yusuke Johira ◽  
Yuki Shirane ◽  
...  

The association between radiological response and overall survival (OS) was retrospectively evaluated in patients treated with lenvatinib as a first-line systemic treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. A total of 182 patients with Child–Pugh class A liver function and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of zero or one were enrolled. Radiological evaluation was performed using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) and modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST). Initial radiological evaluation confirmed significant stratification of OS by efficacy judgment with both RECIST and mRECIST, and that initial radiological response was an independent prognostic factor for OS on multivariate analysis. Furthermore, in patients with stable disease (SD) at initial evaluation, macrovascular invasion at the initial evaluation on RECIST and modified albumin–bilirubin grade at initial evaluation on mRECIST were independent predictors of OS on multivariate analysis. In conclusion, if objective response is obtained at the initial evaluation, continuation of treatment appears desirable because prolonged OS can be expected; but, if SD is obtained at the initial evaluation, one should determine whether to continue or switch to the next treatment, with careful consideration of factors related to the tumor and hepatic reserve at the initial evaluation.


Author(s):  
Jinwei Du ◽  
Dayu Zhang ◽  
Joseph A. Pathakamuri ◽  
Daniel Kuebler ◽  
Ying Yang ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Khin Zay Yar Myint ◽  
Junichi Taguchi ◽  
Masamori Shimabuku ◽  
Kenichi Kashihara ◽  
Ruriko Horio ◽  
...  

Tumor response and disease progression are assessed using imaging technologies. However, these technologies fail to detect tumor responses at the molecular level and clonal evolution. A potential surrogate for such parameters is using circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). This study aimed to examine the quantity and composition of the ctDNA results of 29 cancer patients before and after dendritic cell (DC) immunotherapy and develop criteria to evaluate the molecular response to treatment based on these results. We categorized the patients into four categories based on percent changes in the total ctDNA compared with the baseline ctDNA titers, and this response assessment was termed genomic response evaluation criteria in solid tumors or gRECIST. Even those who are clinically evaluated as having a good response might harbor unfavorable tumor responses at the molecular level. Newly formed ctDNA levels can be the most prognostic parameter in tumor progression or the treatment response, while ctDNA clearance and the decline or rise in existing ctDNA did not change significantly in genomic response categories (gRECIST). More research is needed to support the clinical use of ctDNA in precision oncology and personalized cancer treatment.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dong Ho Lee ◽  
Sangyoun Hwang ◽  
Young Hwan Koh ◽  
Kyung-Hun Lee ◽  
Ju Yeon Kim ◽  
...  

Immune response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (iRECIST) is recommended during immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) treatment, due to the possibility of pseudoprogression. We evaluated the frequency of pseudoprogression in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. This retrospective multicenter study involved 158 consecutive patients who underwent nivolumab treatment for HCC in Korea. At the initial evaluation, 94 patients presented with immune unconfirmed progressive disease, and 22 continued nivolumab. At the second evaluation, 21 of the 22 patients (95.5%) had confirmed progression and no pseudoprogression was observed. Considering low possibility of pseudoprogression, iRECIST may not be required for HCC.


Liver Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinhong Jung ◽  
Ji Hyeon Joo ◽  
So Yeon Kim ◽  
Jin Hyoung Kim ◽  
Jonggi Choi ◽  
...  

Introduction: We evaluated the radiologic response rate of combined transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus radiotherapy (RT) in treatment-naïve patients with liver-confined hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with macroscopic vascular invasion (MVI) and analyzed its clinical importance in overall survival (OS) outcomes. Methods: Patients who were treated with TACE plus RT as a first-line treatment for HCC with MVI between January 2010 and December 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Radiologic response was assessed according to the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) at 2- and 4-months after completion of RT. Landmark analysis at 2- and 4-months and time-dependent Cox regression analysis using response as a time-dependent covariate were performed for univariable and multivariable analyses. Results: The 2-month landmark analysis included 427 patients, and the 4-month landmark analysis included 355 patients after excluding patients without imaging studies for response evaluation at 4 months. Radiologic responses were observed in 210 (49.2%) patients at 2 months and 181 (51.8%) at 4 months. In multivariable analyses, radiologic response was identified as an independent prognosticator for OS at 2 months (median OS: responders, 23.1 months vs. non-responders, 8.0 months; hazard ratio [HR], 3.194; P < 0.001) and 4 months (median OS: responders, 26.5 months vs. non-responders, 9.3 months; HR, 4.534; P < 0.001). Conclusion: Radiologic response assessed by mRECIST was a significant prognostic factor for OS in patients with advanced-stage HCC showing MVI treated with combined TACE plus RT.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document