“What is the Role of Midfacial Sutures in the Development of Maxillary Hypoplasia in Children With Cleft Palate?”

2022 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Zachary D. Zapatero ◽  
Anna R. Carlson ◽  
Mychajlo S. Kosyk ◽  
Christopher L. Kalmar ◽  
Jordan W. Swanson ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Cecilia Rosso ◽  
Antonio Mario Bulfamante ◽  
Carlotta Pipolo ◽  
Emanuela Fuccillo ◽  
Alberto Maccari ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose Cleft palate children have a higher incidence of otitis media with effusion, more frequent recurrent acute otitis media episodes, and worse conductive hearing losses than non-cleft children. Nevertheless, data on adenoidectomy for middle ear disease in this patient group are scarce, since many feared worsening of velopharyngeal insufficiency after the procedure. This review aims at collecting the available evidence on this subject, to frame possible further areas of research and interventions. Methods A PRISMA-compliant systematic review was performed. Multiple databases were searched with criteria designed to include all studies focusing on the role of adenoidectomy in treating middle ear disease in cleft palate children. After duplicate removal, abstract and full-text selection, and quality assessment, we reviewed eligible articles for clinical indications and outcomes. Results Among 321 unique citations, 3 studies published between 1964 and 1972 (2 case series and a retrospective cohort study) were deemed eligible, with 136 treated patients. The outcomes were positive in all three articles in terms of conductive hearing loss improvement, recurrent otitis media episodes reduction, and effusive otitis media resolution. Conclusion Despite promising results, research on adenoidectomy in treating middle ear disease in the cleft population has stopped in the mid-Seventies. No data are, therefore, available on the role of modern conservative adenoidectomy techniques (endoscopic and/or partial) in this context. Prospective studies are required to define the role of adenoidectomy in cleft children, most interestingly in specific subgroups such as patients requiring re-tympanostomy, given their known risk of otologic sequelae.


Teratology ◽  
1970 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 237-244 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ravindra Nanda
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (6) ◽  
pp. 353-359 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valentina De Robertis ◽  
Georgios Rembouskos ◽  
Tiziana Fanelli ◽  
Carmela Votino ◽  
Paolo Volpe

2020 ◽  
pp. 105566562097736
Author(s):  
Miles J. Pfaff ◽  
Leila Musavi ◽  
Maxwell M. Wang ◽  
Christos S. Haveles ◽  
Claire Liu ◽  
...  

Background: The role of perioperative antibiotics in cleft palate remains a topic of debate. Advocates stress their importance in preventing local and systemic infections and decreasing the incidence of oronasal fistula formation. However, few studies to date have directly evaluated the role of antibiotics and other antimicrobial measures in cleft palate surgery. Objective: The aim of this review is to evaluate the evidence surrounding the use of perioperative antibiotics and other antimicrobial interventions in cleft palate surgery. Additionally, we review the literature on the oral flora unique to the cleft palate patient population. Methods: This was accomplished utilizing PubMed, Medline, and the Cochrane Library with MeSH and generic terms. Articles were selected based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results: This review highlights the lack of higher level evidence on perioperative antibiotic use and other antimicrobial interventions in cleft palatoplasty and calls for further research on the matter. Conclusions: The literature appears to support the use of preoperative antibiotics for cleft palatoplasty, but the benefits of prolonged postoperative antibiotic use remain questionable.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document