scholarly journals Modified TCA/acetone precipitation of plant proteins for proteomic analysis

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liangjie Niu ◽  
Hang Zhang ◽  
Zhaokun Wu ◽  
Yibo Wang ◽  
Hui Liu ◽  
...  

AbstractProtein extracts obtained from cells or tissues often require removal of interfering substances for the preparation of high-quality protein samples in proteomic analysis. A number of protein extraction methods have been applied to various biological samples. TCA/acetone precipitation and phenol extraction, a common method of protein extraction, is thought to minimize protein degradation and activity of proteases as well as reduce contaminants like salts and polyphenols. However, the TCA/acetone precipitation method relies on the complete pulverization and repeated rinsing of tissue powder to remove the interfering substances, which is laborious and time-consuming. In addition, by prolonged incubation in TCA/acetone, the precipitated proteins are more difficult to re-dissolve. We have described a modified method of TCA/acetone precipitation of plant proteins for proteomic analysis. Proteins of cells or tissues were extracted using SDS-containing buffer, precipitated with equal volume of 20% TCA/acetone, and washed with acetone. Compared to classical TCA/acetone precipitation and simple acetone precipitation, this protocol generates comparable yields, spot numbers, and proteome profiling, but takes less time (ca. 45 min), thus avoiding excess protein modification and degradation after extended-period incubation in TCA/acetone or acetone. The modified TCA/acetone precipitation method is simple, fast, and suitable for proteomic analysis of various plant tissues in proteomic analysis.

2016 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 100-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jameel R. Al-Obaidi ◽  
Noor Baity Saidi ◽  
Siti Rokhiyah Ahmad Usuldin ◽  
Siti Nahdatul Isnaini Said Hussin ◽  
Noornabeela Md Yusoff ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
pp. e0202238 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liangjie Niu ◽  
Hang Zhang ◽  
Zhaokun Wu ◽  
Yibo Wang ◽  
Hui Liu ◽  
...  

Crop Science ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 395-402 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chengjian Xie ◽  
De Wang ◽  
Xingyong Yang

Mycologia ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 100 (6) ◽  
pp. 867-875 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dilip K. Lakshman ◽  
Savithiry S. Natarajan ◽  
Sukla Lakshman ◽  
Wesley M. Garrett ◽  
Arun K. Dhar

PLoS ONE ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. e0211612
Author(s):  
Liangjie Niu ◽  
Hang Zhang ◽  
Zhaokun Wu ◽  
Yibo Wang ◽  
Hui Liu ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. 1221-1229
Author(s):  
Luciana da Silva Viana ◽  
Paulo Pedro da Silva ◽  
Velber Xavier Nascimento ◽  
Alessandro Riffel ◽  
Antônio Euzébio Goulart Sant’Ana

The extraction of proteins from plants is a crucial procedure for successful protein determination such as purification, separation, and mass spectrometry. Protein extraction from plant tissues is generally difficult due to the presence of various molecules (cell wall, polysaccharides, and lipids) and interfering compounds. For this reason, the step of separation of proteins is a big challenge in obtaining good results in plant proteomic studies, notably from sugarcane. The current study assesses three extraction methods to prepare protein samples for proteomic analysis. Method 1 (control): TCA/acetone, method 2: TCA/acetone modified and Method 3: Phenol/SDS/ammonium acetate. Plants of cultivar RB92579 were grown in 10L pots under ideal humidity conditions in a greenhouse for 60 days. Samples collected on leaves +1 and roots were carried out using nitrogen and stored in an ultra-freezer at -80ºC for later use in proteome assays. For the tested methods, a comparison was made between the quantitative and qualitative data obtained from the tissue of sugarcane leaves and roots. According to the results obtained, methods 2 and 3 produced the best yield in the extraction of total proteins from the leaves and roots of sugarcane, when compared to (control) method 1 (TCA/acetone). This can be observed when comparing the quantitative and qualitative data obtained using the different extraction methods. By comparing methods 2 and 3, the latter showed a massive gain of extracted proteins much greater than the first method, mainly when the extraction of total proteins from the roots are compared. Similarly, the 2-DE gels run after using method 3 showed less background, compared to method 2. Another observation was the presence of different “spots” in the 2-DE gels between the samples extracted using methods 2 and 3. Method 3 (phenol / SDS / ammonium acetate) presented better results for extraction of proteins and in the 2-DE gels, with a greater number of total and specific “spots”, greater reproducibility and less background. This method could be utilized as the standard method for proteomic studies in sugarcane.


2012 ◽  
Vol 85 (2) ◽  
pp. 177-183 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dubravko Pavoković ◽  
Bojana Križnik ◽  
Marijana Krsnik-Rasol

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document