scholarly journals Gibbs entropy from entanglement in electric quenches

2021 ◽  
Vol 104 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrien Florio ◽  
Dmitri E. Kharzeev
Keyword(s):  
2009 ◽  
Vol 355 (10-12) ◽  
pp. 624-627 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeppe C. Dyre ◽  
Tina Hechsher ◽  
Kristine Niss
Keyword(s):  

2006 ◽  
Vol 16 (06) ◽  
pp. 1727-1738 ◽  
Author(s):  
YUZURU SATO ◽  
CONSTANTINO TSALLIS

Many natural and artificial systems whose range of interaction is long enough are known to exhibit (quasi)stationary states that defy the standard, Boltzmann–Gibbs statistical mechanical prescriptions. For handling such anomalous systems (or at least some classes of them), nonextensive statistical mechanics has been proposed based on the entropy [Formula: see text], with [Formula: see text] (Boltzmann–Gibbs entropy). Special collective correlations can be mathematically constructed such that the strictly additive entropy is now Sq for an adequate value of q ≠ 1, whereas Boltzmann–Gibbs entropy is nonadditive. Since important classes of systems exist for which the strict additivity of Boltzmann–Gibbs entropy is replaced by asymptotic additivity (i.e. extensivity), a variety of classes are expected to exist for which the strict additivity of Sq (q ≠ 1) is similarly replaced by asymptotic additivity (i.e. extensivity). All probabilistically well defined systems whose adequate entropy is S1 are called extensive (or normal). They correspond to a number W eff of effectively occupied states which grows exponentially with the number N of elements (or subsystems). Those whose adequate entropy is Sq (q ≠ 1) are currently called nonextensive (or anomalous). They correspond to W eff growing like a power of N. To illustrate this scenario, recently addressed [Tsallis, 2004] we provide in this paper details about systems composed by N = 2, 3 two-state subsystems.


Physica ◽  
1969 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 263-276 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Nicolis ◽  
J. Wallenborn ◽  
M.G. Velarde

2016 ◽  
Vol 30 (22) ◽  
pp. 1650252 ◽  
Author(s):  
Won Sang Chung

In this paper, we present two exponential type probability distributions which are different from Tsallis’s case which we call Type I: one given by [Formula: see text] (Type IIA) and another given by [Formula: see text] (Type IIIA). Starting with the Boltzman–Gibbs entropy, we obtain the different probability distribution by using the Kolmogorov–Nagumo average for the microstate energies. We present the first-order differential equations related to Types I, II and III. For three types of probability distributions, we discuss the quantum harmonic oscillator, two-level problem and the spin-[Formula: see text] paramagnet.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document