Comment on ‘‘Predicted time dependence of the switching field for magnetic materials’’

1990 ◽  
Vol 65 (9) ◽  
pp. 1170-1170 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Walton
2012 ◽  
Vol 132 (10) ◽  
pp. 838-843 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nobuaki Kikuchi ◽  
Yoshihiro Suyama ◽  
Satoshi Okamoto ◽  
Osamu Kitakami

2013 ◽  
Vol 96 (12) ◽  
pp. 9-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nobuaki Kikuchi ◽  
Yoshihiro Suyama ◽  
Satoshi Okamoto ◽  
Osamu Kitakami

2000 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 2477-2479 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.L. Mallary ◽  
A.F. Torabi ◽  
R. Beauregard

2010 ◽  
Vol 97 (6) ◽  
pp. 062504 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. Hovorka ◽  
R. F. L. Evans ◽  
R. W. Chantrell ◽  
A. Berger

1999 ◽  
Vol 173 ◽  
pp. 185-188
Author(s):  
Gy. Szabó ◽  
K. Sárneczky ◽  
L.L. Kiss

AbstractA widely used tool in studying quasi-monoperiodic processes is the O–C diagram. This paper deals with the application of this diagram in minor planet studies. The main difference between our approach and the classical O–C diagram is that we transform the epoch (=time) dependence into the geocentric longitude domain. We outline a rotation modelling using this modified O–C and illustrate the abilities with detailed error analysis. The primary assumption, that the monotonity and the shape of this diagram is (almost) independent of the geometry of the asteroids is discussed and tested. The monotonity enables an unambiguous distinction between the prograde and retrograde rotation, thus the four-fold (or in some cases the two-fold) ambiguities can be avoided. This turned out to be the main advantage of the O–C examination. As an extension to the theoretical work, we present some preliminary results on 1727 Mette based on new CCD observations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document