scholarly journals Visually-guided Grip Selection for Soft-Hand Exoskeleton

Author(s):  
Xingying Chen ◽  
Simone Lohlein ◽  
John Nassour ◽  
Stefan K. Ehrlich ◽  
Nicolas Berberich ◽  
...  
2008 ◽  
Vol 99 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joo-Hyun Song ◽  
Naomi Takahashi ◽  
Robert M. McPeek

We examined target selection for visually guided reaching in monkeys using a visual search task in which an odd-colored target was presented with distractors. The colors of the target and distractors were randomly switched in each trial between red and green, and the number of distractors was varied. Previous studies of saccades and attention have shown that target selection in this task is easier when a greater number of homogenous distractors is present. We found that monkeys made fewer reaches to distractors and that reaches to the target were completed more quickly when a greater number of homogenous distractors was present. When the target was presented in a sparse array of distractors, reaches had longer movement durations and greater trajectory curvature. Reaching errors were directed more often to a distractor adjacent to the target, suggesting a spatially coarse-to-fine progression during target selection. Reaches were also influenced by the properties of trials in the recent past. When the colors of the target and distractors remained the same from trial to trial rather than switching, reaches were completed more quickly and accurately, indicating that color priming across trials facilitates target selection. Moreover, when difficult search trials were randomly intermixed with easier trials without distractors, reach latencies were influenced by the difficulty of previous trials, indicating that motor initiation strategies are gradually adjusted based on accumulated experience. Overall, these results are consistent with reaching results in humans, indicating that the monkey provides a sound model for understanding the neural underpinnings of reach target selection.


2010 ◽  
Vol 7 (9) ◽  
pp. 296-296
Author(s):  
J.-H. Song ◽  
R. McPeek ◽  
N. Takahashi

2012 ◽  
Vol 233 (2) ◽  
pp. 359-366 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroyuki Uchiyama ◽  
Hiroshi Ohno ◽  
Ryuki Kodama

1987 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
pp. 687-717 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shaheen Ahmad ◽  
John T. Feddema

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 151-170
Author(s):  
Lauren R. Samuels ◽  
Robert A. Greevy

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 1000-1009
Author(s):  
Allison Bean ◽  
Lindsey Paden Cargill ◽  
Samantha Lyle

Purpose Nearly 50% of school-based speech-language pathologists (SLPs) provide services to school-age children who use augmentative and alternative communication (AAC). However, many SLPs report having insufficient knowledge in the area of AAC implementation. The objective of this tutorial is to provide clinicians with a framework for supporting 1 area of AAC implementation: vocabulary selection for preliterate children who use AAC. Method This tutorial focuses on 4 variables that clinicians should consider when selecting vocabulary: (a) contexts/environments where the vocabulary can be used, (b) time span during which the vocabulary will be relevant, (c) whether the vocabulary can elicit and maintain interactions with other people, and (d) whether the vocabulary will facilitate developmentally appropriate grammatical structures. This tutorial focuses on the role that these variables play in language development in verbal children with typical development, verbal children with language impairment, and nonverbal children who use AAC. Results Use of the 4 variables highlighted above may help practicing SLPs select vocabulary that will best facilitate language acquisition in preliterate children who use AAC.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document