Oral and Verbal Praxis in Impaired Language Learners

In the context of language descriptions, the terms oral and verbal praxis refer to volitional movements for performing oral gestures and movements for speech. These movements involve programming articulators and rapid sequences of muscle firings that are required for speech sound productions. A growing body of research has highlighted the links between oral motor kinematics and language production skills in both typically developing (TD) children and children with developmental language disorders, including Specific Language Impairment (SLI). Yet, there have been limited attempts to assess the link between non-linguistic and linguistic development. In the present study, we investigated oral and verbal praxis behaviors in children with SLI. Fifteen children with SLI formed a clinical group and 15 children with typical development who were matched to the clinical group for chronological age, gender, and socio-economic status formed the TD group. We assessed participants in both groups for their language abilities with age-appropriate standardized language tests. To investigate oral and verbal praxis behaviors, we administered the Assessment Protocol for Oral Motor, Oral Praxis and Verbal Praxis Skills to the two groups. We used the non-parametric Mann–Whitney U test to compare the two groups with respect to oral and verbal praxis measures; and we found a significant difference between isolated and sequential movements in the oral praxis section in two age subgroups of these groups ( p ≤ .05). Spearman’s correlations revealed a strong correlation between core language scores and sequential movements in the younger children with SLI and in TD children. These results showed co-morbidity between SLI and poor oral motor skills, suggesting that SLI is not just a language disorder, but a group of co-morbid conditions that include oral motor and verbal praxis difficulties.

The dissociable effects of reward on sequential motor behaviour

Reward has consistently been shown to enhance motor performance however its beneficial effects appear to be largely unspecific. While reward has been shown to invigorate performance, it also enhances learning and/or retention. Therefore, a mechanistic account of the effects of reward on motor behaviour is lacking. Here we tested the hypothesis that these distinct reward-based improvements are driven by dissociable reward types: explicit reward (i.e. money) and performance feedback (i.e. points). Experiment 1 showed that explicit reward instantaneously improved movement times (MT) using a novel sequential reaching task. In contrast, performance-based feedback led to learning-related improvements. Importantly, pairing both maximised MT performance gains and accelerated movement fusion. Fusion describes an optimisation process during which neighbouring sequential movements blend together to form singular actions. Results from experiment 2 served as a replication and showed that fusion led to enhanced performance speed whilst also improving movement efficiency through increased smoothness. Finally, experiment 3 showed that these improvements in performance persist for 24 hours even without reward availability. This highlights the dissociable impact of explicit reward and performance feedback, with their combination maximising performance gains and leading to stable improvements in the speed and efficiency of sequential actions.

The Roles of the Cortical Motor Areas in Sequential Movements

The ability to learn and perform a sequence of movements is a key component of voluntary motor behavior. During the learning of sequential movements, individuals go through distinct stages of performance improvement. For instance, sequential movements are initially learned relatively fast and later learned more slowly. Over multiple sessions of repetitive practice, performance of the sequential movements can be further improved to the expert level and maintained as a motor skill. How the brain binds elementary movements together into a meaningful action has been a topic of much interest. Studies in human and non-human primates have shown that a brain-wide distributed network is active during the learning and performance of skilled sequential movements. The current challenge is to identify a unique contribution of each area to the complex process of learning and maintenance of skilled sequential movements. Here, I bring together the recent progress in the field to discuss the distinct roles of cortical motor areas in this process.

Competitive state of movements during planning predicts sequence performance

Sequence planning is an integral part of motor sequence control. Here, we demonstrate that the competitive state of sequential movements during sequence planning can be read out behaviorally through movement probes. We show that position-dependent differences in movement availability during planning reflect sequence preparedness and skill but not the timing of the planned sequence. Behavioral access to the preparatory state of movements may serve as a marker of sequence planning capacity.

Spontaneous grouping of saccade timing in the presence of task-irrelevant objects

Sequential movements are often grouped into several chunks, as evidenced by the modulation of the timing of each elemental movement. Even during synchronized tapping with a metronome, we sometimes feel subjective accent for every few taps. To examine whether motor segmentation emerges during synchronized movements, we trained monkeys to generate a series of predictive saccades synchronized with visual stimuli which sequentially appeared for a fixed interval (400 or 600 ms) at six circularly arranged landmark locations. We found two types of motor segmentations that featured periodic modulation of saccade timing. First, the intersaccadic interval (ISI) depended on the target location and saccade direction, indicating that particular combinations of saccades were integrated into motor chunks. Second, when a task-irrelevant rectangular contour surrounding three landmarks ("inducer") was presented, the ISI significantly modulated depending on the relative target location to the inducer. All patterns of individual differences seen in monkeys were also observed in humans. Importantly, the effects of the inducer greatly decreased or disappeared when the animals were trained to generate only reactive saccades (latency >100 ms), indicating that the motor segmentation may depend on the internal rhythms. Thus, our results demonstrate two types of motor segmentation during synchronized movements: one is related to the hierarchical organization of sequential movements and the other is related to the spontaneous grouping of rhythmic events. This experimental paradigm can be used to investigate the underlying neural mechanism of temporal grouping during rhythm production.

An Algorithm for Crawling Robot Climbing or Descending Stair Flights

Purpose of research. The aim of this work is to develop an algorithm for sequential movements of a three-section crawling robot, which enables the device overcoming flights of stairs by crawling on each step or descending each step in the reverse sequence of stages. A special feature of the robot is the combination of three types of movement: snake-, worm - and caterpillar-like, which makes the device more maneuverable and expands its functionality. Methods. To develop a mathematical model of the movement of crawling robot sections at each stage of the algorithm and description of its contact interaction with the surface, the method of dynamics of multi-mass systems is used; methods of kinematic and structural analysis of the robot mechanism are used to form constraints that restrict the movement of the sections. Results. The article presents the results of simulation experiments of a robot crawling on a step of a flight of stairs and descending it, confirming the adequacy of the proposed movement algorithm. Positions of base points at the moments of the beginning and completion of the stages, section lengths and their turning angles in the vertical plane correspond to the values of these variables specified in the algorithm in the form of applied links and laid down conditions for the completion of stages. Conclusion. The article describes a detailed step-by-step algorithm for robot crawling on a step of a stairs flight and descending it; it is shown that crawling and descending are opposite operations from the point of view of sequence of stages implementing. The advantage of this algorithm is the versatility of its stages for moving the robot up and downstairs. In addition, the algorithm stages are designed in such a way that the robot does not roll over.

Repetita iuvant: repetition facilitates online planning of sequential movements

Even for overlearned motor skills such as reaching, movement repetition improves performance. How brain processes associated with motor planning or execution benefit from repetition, however, remains unclear. We report the novel finding of repetition effects for sequential movements. Our results show that repetition benefits are tied to improved online planning of upcoming sequence elements. We also highlight how actual movement experience appears to be more beneficial than mental rehearsal for observing short-term repetition effects.

Inhibition of protein synthesis in M1 of monkeys disrupts performance of sequential movements guided by memory

The production of action sequences is a fundamental aspect of motor skills. To examine whether primary motor cortex (M1) is involved in maintenance of sequential movements, we trained two monkeys (Cebus apella) to perform two sequential reaching tasks. In one task, sequential movements were instructed by visual cues, whereas in the other task, movements were generated from memory after extended practice. After the monkey became proficient with performing the tasks, we injected an inhibitor of protein synthesis, anisomycin, into M1 to disrupt information storage in this area. Injection of anisomycin in M1 had a marked effect on the performance of sequential movements that were guided by memory. In contrast, the anisomycin injection did not have a significant effect on the performance of movements guided by vision. These results suggest that M1 of non-human primates is involved in the maintenance of skilled sequential movements.