The Algerian seismic design code (RPA99) recommends a limit on the elastic period as a governing factor in the design process of low and mid‐rise buildings, function of the structural system regardless of the related ductility level. The recommended limit criterion is evaluated through approximate analytical methods using drift limit. The assignable displacement ductility ratio for the force reduction factor is derived from some well established R‐μ‐Tn expressions. The limit period evaluation procedure (proposed in this paper) agrees with a capacity design approach since it allows for adjusting the required resistance demand level function of a ductility level resulting from code's steel recommendations. This will enhance seismic design procedure based on a target‐period approach such as in the Algerian seismic design code RPA99, to fulfil the minimum required two performance levels or to satisfy three performance levels if a damage control is considered. A critical study is carried out considering three regular earthquake‐resistant concrete framed structures and taking into account the specificity of various types of soils, namely rock, firm and soft. A comparison of the obtained results shows clearly that the RPA99 recommended limit is only valid for nude moment resisting frames.
LIMIT PERIOD BASED ON APPROXIMATE ANALYTICAL METHODS ESTIMATING INELASTIC DISPLACEMENT DEMANDS OF BUILDINGS
