Assessment of Articulation Disorder Using Objective Quality Measures

Author(s):  
Smitha Paul ◽  
Ben P. Babu ◽  
Leena Mary
2014 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 2446-2458 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adriaan Barri ◽  
Ann Dooms ◽  
Bart Jansen ◽  
Peter Schelkens

Author(s):  
H. Meißner ◽  
M. Cramer ◽  
B. Piltz

UAV based imaging and 3D object point generation is an established technology. Some of the UAV users try to address (very) highaccuracy applications, i.e. inspection or monitoring scenarios. In order to guarantee such level of detail and accuracy high resolving imaging systems are mandatory. Furthermore, image quality considerably impacts photogrammetric processing, as the tie point transfer, mandatory for forming the block geometry, fully relies on the radiometric quality of images. Thus, empirical testing of radiometric camera performance is an important issue, in addition to standard (geometric) calibration, which normally is covered primarily. Within this paper the resolving power of ten different camera/lens installations has been investigated. Selected systems represent different camera classes, like DSLRs, system cameras, larger format cameras and proprietary systems. As the systems have been tested in wellcontrolled laboratory conditions and objective quality measures have been derived, individual performance can be compared directly, thus representing a first benchmark on radiometric performance of UAV cameras. The results have shown, that not only the selection of appropriate lens and camera body has an impact, in addition the image pre-processing, i.e. the use of a specific debayering method, significantly influences the final resolving power.


2020 ◽  
pp. 411-417
Author(s):  
Arkadiy Prodeus ◽  
Maryna Didkovska

This paper compares the results of subjective and objective assessments of the quality of speech and music signals distorted during clipping when large instantaneous signal values are replaced by a certain threshold constant or by values close to it. It was proposed in recent works to use kurtosis and some of its simple functional transforms such as reciprocal of kurtosis and square root of reciprocal of kurtosis as objective (instrumental) clipping value measures. This paper clarifies the results of a subjective assessment of the quality of speech and music signals distorted by clipping. A comparison of the obtained estimates allows one to conclude that the human auditory system is slightly more sensitive to the clipping of musical signals than to the clipping of speech signals, but this difference is small. Similarly, objective quality measures of clipped signals are almost equally sensitive to the clipping value of speech and music signals. An analysis of the variability of the kurtosis estimates, depending on the time of estimation, showed that the relative standard deviation of the kurtosis estimates is close to 10% for the analysis time interval of 1–40 s.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document