Handwritten digit recognition using multilayer feedforward neural networks with periodic and monotonic activation functions

Author(s):  
Kwok-wo Wong ◽  
Chi-sing Leung ◽  
Sheng-jiang Chang
2020 ◽  
Vol 224 ◽  
pp. 01025
Author(s):  
Alexey Beskopylny ◽  
Alexandr Lyapin ◽  
Nikita Beskopylny ◽  
Elena Kadomtseva

The article is devoted to the problem of comparing the effectiveness of feedforward (FF) and convolutional neural networks (CNN) algorithms in the problems of handwritten digit recognition and classification. In recent years, the attention of many researchers to the FF and CNN algorithms has given rise to many hybrid models focused on solving specific problems. At the same time, the efficiency of each algorithm in terms of accuracy and labour intensity remains unclear. It is shown that in classical problems, FFs can have advantages over CNN in terms of labour intensity with the same accuracy of results. Using the handwritten digits data from the MNIST database as an example, it is shown that FF algorithms provide greater accuracy and require less computation time than CNN.


2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (15) ◽  
pp. 3169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alejandro Baldominos ◽  
Yago Saez ◽  
Pedro Isasi

This paper summarizes the top state-of-the-art contributions reported on the MNIST dataset for handwritten digit recognition. This dataset has been extensively used to validate novel techniques in computer vision, and in recent years, many authors have explored the performance of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and other deep learning techniques over this dataset. To the best of our knowledge, this paper is the first exhaustive and updated review of this dataset; there are some online rankings, but they are outdated, and most published papers survey only closely related works, omitting most of the literature. This paper makes a distinction between those works using some kind of data augmentation and works using the original dataset out-of-the-box. Also, works using CNNs are reported separately; as they are becoming the state-of-the-art approach for solving this problem. Nowadays, a significant amount of works have attained a test error rate smaller than 1% on this dataset; which is becoming non-challenging. By mid-2017, a new dataset was introduced: EMNIST, which involves both digits and letters, with a larger amount of data acquired from a database different than MNIST’s. In this paper, EMNIST is explained and some results are surveyed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document