In this paper, the performance of compressive sensing (CS)-based technique for speech enhancement has been studied and results analyzed with recovery algorithms as a comparison of their performances. This is done for several recovery algorithms such as matching pursuit, orthogonal matching pursuit, stage-wise orthogonal matching pursuit, compressive sampling matching pursuit and generalized orthogonal matching pursuit. Performances of all these greedy algorithms were compared for speech enhancement. The evaluation of results has been carried out using objective measures (perceptual evaluation of speech quality, log-likelihood ratio, weighted spectral slope distance and segmental signal-to-noise ratio), simulation time and composite objective measures (signal distortion C[Formula: see text], background intrusiveness C[Formula: see text] and overall quality C[Formula: see text]. Results showed that the CS-based technique using generalized orthogonal matching pursuit algorithm yields better performance than the other recovery algorithms in terms of speech quality and distortion.
A Sharp Bound on RIC in Generalized Orthogonal Matching Pursuit
