Evaluation of the Effectiveness of a Web-Based Learning Design for Adult Computer Science Courses

2011 ◽  
Vol 54 (3) ◽  
pp. 374-380 ◽  
Author(s):  
Konstantinos Antonis ◽  
Thanasis Daradoumis ◽  
Spyros Papadakis ◽  
Christos Simos
Author(s):  
Stauffer Karen ◽  
Fuhua Lin ◽  
Koole Marguerite

This article presents a methodology for developing learning objects for web-based courses using the IMS Learning Design (IMS LD) specification. We first investigated the IMS LD specification, determining how to use it with online courses and the student delivery model, and then applied this to a Unit of Learning (UOL) for online computer science courses. We developed an editor and runtime environment to apply the IMS LD to a UOL. We then explored the prospect for advancement of the basic IMS LD UOL. Finally, we discussed how to construct ontology-based software agents to use with the learning objects created with the IMS LD Units of Learning.


2007 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 338-344 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dimitris Kanellopoulos ◽  
Evangelos Sakkopoulos ◽  
Miltiadis Lytras ◽  
Athanasios Tsakalidis

10.28945/2304 ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 237-254 ◽  
Author(s):  
John English ◽  
Tammy English

In this paper we discuss the use of automated assessment in a variety of computer science courses that have been taught at Israel Academic College by the authors. The course assignments were assessed entirely automatically using Checkpoint, a web-based automated assessment framework. The assignments all used free-text questions (where the students type in their own answers). Students were allowed to correct errors based on feedback provided by the system and resubmit their answers. A total of 141 students were surveyed to assess their opinions of this approach, and we analysed their responses. Analysis of the questionnaire showed a low correlation between questions, indicating the statistical independence of the individual questions. As a whole, student feedback on using Checkpoint was very positive, emphasizing the benefits of multiple attempts, impartial marking, and a quick turnaround time for submissions. Many students said that Checkpoint gave them confidence in learning and motivation to practise. Students also said that the detailed feedback that Checkpoint generated when their programs failed helped them understand their mistakes and how to correct them.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document