Long-term survival following open repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm

2016 ◽  
Vol 87 (5) ◽  
pp. 390-393 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raymond Englund ◽  
Nedal Katib
2019 ◽  
Vol 106 (5) ◽  
pp. 523-533 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. M. A. Bulder ◽  
E. Bastiaannet ◽  
J. F. Hamming ◽  
J. H. N. Lindeman

2019 ◽  
Vol 106 (13) ◽  
pp. 1784-1793 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. S. Johal ◽  
I. M. Loftus ◽  
J. R. Boyle ◽  
K. Heikkila ◽  
S. Waton ◽  
...  

1993 ◽  
Vol 80 (5) ◽  
pp. 585-586 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. A. Stonebridge ◽  
M. J. Callam ◽  
A. W. Bradbury ◽  
A. Murie ◽  
A. McL. Jenkins ◽  
...  

Vascular ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 191-196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J. Hinchliffe ◽  
Bruce D. Braithwaite

Recent studies have suggested that endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) may reduce the perioperative mortality of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Whether EVAR confers any long-term survival advantage over published results for open repair of ruptured AAA has not been established. We conducted a single-center retrospective study over a 10-year period (1994–2004) examining the long-term outcome of patients who have undergone endovascular repair of ruptured AAA. Fifty-four patients underwent endovascular repair of a ruptured AAA. The median age was 75 years (interquartile range 69.5–79.5 years); 42 (78%) patients were male. The perioperative mortality rate was 37%. During a median follow-up of 32 months (range 14–48 months), there were 5 aneurysm-related and 13 non-aneurysm-related deaths. Overall, the 3- and 5-year survival rates were 36% and 26%, respectively. EVAR does not appear to confer any overall survival advantage in the mid- to long term compared with the published results for open repair. The reasons for this remain unclear. Further, larger studies are required to confirm these results.


1990 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 460-465 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Vohra ◽  
D. Reid ◽  
J. Groome ◽  
A.T.O. Abdool-Carrim ◽  
J.G. Pollock

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document