Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Endovascular Repair Does Not Confer Any Long-term Survival Advantage Over Open Repair

Vascular ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 191-196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J. Hinchliffe ◽  
Bruce D. Braithwaite

Recent studies have suggested that endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) may reduce the perioperative mortality of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Whether EVAR confers any long-term survival advantage over published results for open repair of ruptured AAA has not been established. We conducted a single-center retrospective study over a 10-year period (1994–2004) examining the long-term outcome of patients who have undergone endovascular repair of ruptured AAA. Fifty-four patients underwent endovascular repair of a ruptured AAA. The median age was 75 years (interquartile range 69.5–79.5 years); 42 (78%) patients were male. The perioperative mortality rate was 37%. During a median follow-up of 32 months (range 14–48 months), there were 5 aneurysm-related and 13 non-aneurysm-related deaths. Overall, the 3- and 5-year survival rates were 36% and 26%, respectively. EVAR does not appear to confer any overall survival advantage in the mid- to long term compared with the published results for open repair. The reasons for this remain unclear. Further, larger studies are required to confirm these results.

Vascular ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 231-238 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hilin Yildirim ◽  
Guus W van Lammeren ◽  
Çagdas Ünlü ◽  
Eric P van Dongen ◽  
Rob HW van de Mortel ◽  
...  

Objectives To evaluate long-term outcome and quality of life after open and endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. Methods All consecutive ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm patients at the St. Antonius Hospital treated for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm between January 2005 and January 2015 were included. Mortality, morbidity, and re-interventions within 30 days and during follow-up were registered. Quality of life was measured with Short Form-36 questionnaire among survivors. Additional subgroup analysis between open repair and endovascular repair was performed. Results A total of 192 patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm were included: 76.6% (147/192) underwent open repair and 23.4% (45/192) endovascular repair. All-cause 30-day mortality rate was 31.3% (60/192), and 30-day morbidity rate was 70.3% (135/192). Median stay at the intensive care unit was two days for endovascular repair and four days for open repair ( p = 0.002). No other statistically significant differences between endovascular repair and open repair were observed. After a mean follow-up period of 62 months (range 9–126), 72.4% (76/105) of the responders had equivalent Short Form-36 scores as compared to the age-matched general Dutch population, and 84.2% (64/76) of the responders would choose surgery again if they would have a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. Conclusions Survivors of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm have similar long-term quality of life scores compared to the age-matched general population. The majority of all survivors would choose to undergo acute abdominal aortic aneurysm repair again.


2019 ◽  
Vol 106 (5) ◽  
pp. 523-533 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. M. A. Bulder ◽  
E. Bastiaannet ◽  
J. F. Hamming ◽  
J. H. N. Lindeman

2020 ◽  
Vol 44 (6) ◽  
pp. 2020-2027 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Reite ◽  
Kjetil Søreide ◽  
Jan Terje Kvaløy ◽  
Morten Vetrhus

2011 ◽  
Vol 53 (6) ◽  
pp. 40S-41S
Author(s):  
Naveed U. Saqib ◽  
Taeyoung Park ◽  
Sun C. Park ◽  
Robert Rhee ◽  
Rabih A. Chaer ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document