Pregnancy‐ and obstetric‐related risk factors for urinary incontinence, fecal incontinence, or pelvic organ prolapse later in life: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monique A. H. Hage‐Fransen ◽  
Maaike Wiezer ◽  
Amy Otto ◽  
Marleen S. Wieffer‐Platvoet ◽  
Mariska H. Slotman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Urinary Incontinence ◽  
Pelvic Organ Prolapse ◽  
Fecal Incontinence ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Pelvic Organ ◽  
Related Risk

Age and/or postmenopausal status as risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse development: systematic review with meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luiz Gustavo Oliveira Brito ◽  
Glaucia Miranda Varella Pereira ◽  
Pamela Moalli ◽  
Oksana Shynlova ◽  
Jittima Manonai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Pelvic Organ Prolapse ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Pelvic Organ ◽  
Postmenopausal Status

scholarly journals Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Countries of Different Economy: A Systematic Review

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 7-21
Author(s):  
Shishir Paudel ◽  
Anisha Chalise ◽  
Ganesh Dangal ◽  
Tulsi Ram Bhandari ◽  
Gehanath Baral
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Pelvic Organ Prolapse ◽  
Uterine Prolapse ◽  
National Income ◽  
Significant Risk ◽  
Pelvic Organ ◽  
Reference List ◽  
Medical Subject Headings ◽  
Pubmed Database

Aims: This review was done to identify the reported prevalence rate of pelvic organ prolapse among the different world populations. Methods: Systematic review of Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP) using the PRISMA checklist; PubMed database was searched on reportingthe prevalence of POP and its management measures in January 2020. Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) like "Pelvic Organ Prolapse"OR "Uterine Prolapse" OR “Vaginal Wall Prolapse” OR "Cystocele"AND "Prevalence [key word/s]" were used. Additional articles were identified through the reference list of the retrieved articles. Results: Out of 91 screened articles, 46 full articles were eligible and only 15 satisfied by selection criteria for the systematic review.The methodological score rated for the quality of studies is 4.5±1.7 (range=2-7) out of 8 points. The mean prevalence of POP diagnosis was 40%; with 42.44% in low and lower-middle-income countries,and 35.56%in upper-middle and high-income countries. Increasing age and parity, body mass indexand fetal macrosomia were found to be the significant risk factors irrespective of the country’s economy. Conclusions:The low and lower-income countries have almost twice the burden of prolapse than the countries of the higher economy. The major risk factors associated with prolapse remain common in all countries irrespective of national income or development.  

scholarly journals A comparison of mortality-related risk factors of COVID-19, SARS, and MERS: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 81 (4) ◽  
pp. e18-e25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lvliang Lu ◽  
Wenyu Zhong ◽  
Ziwei Bian ◽  
Zhiming Li ◽  
Ke Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Related Risk

Paper 29: Risk Factors for Surgically Managed Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Urinary Incontinence

2005 ◽  
Vol 11 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. S14
Author(s):  
C Ghetti ◽  
W T. Gregory ◽  
R Edwards ◽  
S Hamilton ◽  
V Smith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Urinary Incontinence ◽  
Pelvic Organ Prolapse ◽  
Pelvic Organ
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document