Is Courtship Feeding by Male Insects Parental Investment?

Ethology ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 73 (2) ◽  
pp. 161-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
SCOTT K. SAKALUK
2002 ◽  
Vol 357 (1419) ◽  
pp. 309-317 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. F. Bussière

Conflict between mates over the amount of parental investment by each partner is probably the rule except in rare cases of genetic monogamy. In systems with parental care, males may frequently benefit by providing smaller investments than are optimal for individual female partners. Females are therefore expected to choose males that will provide the largest amounts of parental investment. In some species, however, the preferred males provide less care than their rivals. Focusing on species in which males invest by feeding their mates, I use a simple model to demonstrate the conditions under which males preferred by females may have optimal donations that are smaller than those of less–preferred rivals. Pre–mating female choice may sufficiently bias the perception of mate availability of preferred males relative to their rivals such that preferred males gain by conserving resources for future matings. Similarly, ‘cryptic’ biases in favour of high–quality ejaculates by females can compensate for smaller than average donations received from preferred males. However, post–fertilization cryptic choice should not change the optimal donations of preferred males relative to their rivals. I discuss the implications of this work for understanding sexual selection in courtship–feeding animals, and the relevance of these systems to understanding patterns of investment for animals in general.


Author(s):  
Eric T. Steiner ◽  
N. Clayton Silver ◽  
Pam Hall ◽  
Chantal Downing ◽  
Dominic Hurton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2010 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 62-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sigal Tifferet ◽  
Sharon Jorev ◽  
Rinat Nasanovitz
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 183
Author(s):  
Natalia Tańska ◽  
Rafał Czechowski ◽  
Konrad Leniowski ◽  
Ewa Węgrzyn
Keyword(s):  

1981 ◽  
Vol 118 (6) ◽  
pp. 872-875 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. R. Callahan
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (38) ◽  
pp. eaaz5746
Author(s):  
Catherine Crockford ◽  
Liran Samuni ◽  
Linda Vigilant ◽  
Roman M. Wittig

Humans are unusual among animals for continuing to provision and care for their offspring until adulthood. This “prolonged dependency” is considered key for the evolution of other notable human traits, such as large brains, complex societies, and extended postreproductive lifespans. Prolonged dependency must therefore have evolved under conditions in which reproductive success is gained with parental investment and diminished with early parental loss. We tested this idea using data from wild chimpanzees, which have similarly extended immature years as humans and prolonged mother-offspring associations. Males who lost their mothers after weaning but before maturity began reproducing later and had lower average reproductive success. Thus, persistent mother-immature son associations seem vital for enhancing male reproductive success, although mothers barely provision sons after weaning. We posit that these associations lead to social gains, crucial for successful reproduction in complex social societies, and offer insights into the evolution of prolonged dependency.


Genus ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 77 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne H. Gauthier ◽  
Petra W. de Jong

AbstractWhile the literature has documented a general increase in parental investment in children, both in terms of financial and time investment, the motives for this increase remain unclear. This paper aims at shedding light on these motives by examining parents’ own narratives of their parenting experiences from the vantage point of three theoretical perspectives. In doing so, the paper brings side-by-side the goal of providing children with human and social capital to improve their future labour market prospects, the pressures on parents to conform to new societal standards of good and intensive parenting, and the experience of parenting as part of self-development. The data come from a qualitative study of middle-income parents in Canada and the USA. The results provide some support for each of these perspectives, while also revealing how they jointly help explain parents’ large investment in their children as well as the tensions and contradictions that come with it.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document