Phenotypic Plasticity and the Ecotypic Differentiation of Aggressive Behavior in Threespine Stickleback

Ethology ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 113 (2) ◽  
pp. 190-198 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melissa-Ann L. Scotti ◽  
Susan A. Foster
2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. 20170516 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annette Taugbøl ◽  
Anna B. Mazzarella ◽  
Emily R. A. Cramer ◽  
Terje Laskemoen

Phenotypic expression may be and often is influenced by an organism's developmental environment, referred to as phenotypic plasticity. The sperm cells of teleosts have been found to be inactive in the seminal plasma and are activated by osmotic shock for most fish species, through release in either hypertonic (for marine fish) or hypotonic (for freshwater fish) water. If this is the case, the regulatory system of sperm mobility should be reversed in salt- and freshwater fish. We tested this hypothesis by first activating sperm of salt- and freshwater populations of threespine stickleback in salt- and freshwater. The sperm from saltwater stickleback could be activated in either salinity, which matches the freshwater colonization history of the species, whereas the sperm from the freshwater population acted as predicted by the osmotic shock theory and was activated in freshwater only. As the freshwater population used here was calculated to be thousands of years old, we went on to test whether the trait(s) were plastic and sperm from freshwater males still could be activated in saltwater after individuals were exposed to saltwater. After raising freshwater stickleback in saltwater, we found the mature males to have active sperm in both saltwater and freshwater. Further, we also found the sperm of wild-caught freshwater stickleback to be active in saltwater after exposing those mature males to saltwater for only 2 days. This illustrates that the ability for stickleback sperm to be activated in a range of water qualities is an environmentally induced plastic trait.


2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. 3740-3755 ◽  
Author(s):  
Moe Bakhtiari ◽  
Ludovico Formenti ◽  
Veronica Caggìa ◽  
Gaëtan Glauser ◽  
Sergio Rasmann

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Irene Martín-Forés ◽  
Marta Avilés ◽  
Belén Acosta-Gallo ◽  
Martin F. Breed ◽  
Alejandro del Pozo ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Moe Bakhtiari ◽  
Ludovico Formenti ◽  
Veronica Caggía ◽  
Gaëtan Glauser ◽  
Sergio Rasmann

AbstractAlong ecological gradients, ecotypes generally evolve as the result of local adaptation to a specific environment to maximize organisms’ fitness. Alongside ecotypic differentiation, phenotypic plasticity, as the ability of a single genotype to produce different phenotypes under different environmental conditions, can also evolve for favouring increased organisms’ performance in different environments. Currently, there is a lack in our understanding of how varying habitats may contribute to the differential contribution of ecotypic differentiation and plasticity in growth versus defence traits. Using reciprocal transplant-common gardens along steep elevation gradients, we evaluated patterns of ecotypic differentiation and phenotypic plasticity of two coexisting but unrelated plant species, Cardamine pratensis and Plantago major. For both species, we observed ecotypic differentiation accompanied by plasticity in growth related traits. Plants grew faster and produced more biomass when placed at low elevation. In contrast, we observed fixed ecotypic differentiation for defence and resistance traits. Generally, low elevation ecotypes produced higher chemical defences regardless of the growing elevation. Yet, some plasticity was observed for specific compounds, such as indole glucosinolates. We speculate that ecotypic differentiation in defence traits is maintained by costs of chemical defence production, while plasticity in growth traits is regulated by temperature driven growth response maximization.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document