Incremental Validity of Assessment Center Ratings Over Cognitive Ability Tests: A Study at the Executive Management Level

2006 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 360-371 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diana E. Krause ◽  
Martin Kersting ◽  
Eric D. Heggestad ◽  
George C. Thornton
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Ability ◽  
Assessment Center ◽  
Incremental Validity ◽  
Executive Management ◽  
Management Level ◽  
Cognitive Ability Tests ◽  
Ability Tests

THE EFFECTS OF APPLICANTs' REACTIONS TO COGNITIVE ABILITY TESTS AND AN ASSESSMENT CENTER

1994 ◽  
Vol 47 (4) ◽  
pp. 715-738 ◽  
Author(s):  
THERESE HOFF MACAN ◽  
MARCIA J. AVEDON ◽  
MATTHEW PAESE ◽  
DAVID E. SMITH
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Ability ◽  
Assessment Center ◽  
Cognitive Ability Tests ◽  
Ability Tests

Cognitive Ability Tests and the Situational Interview: A Test of Incremental Validity

1994 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
John E. Delery ◽  
Patrick M. Wright ◽  
Kari McArthur ◽  
D. Christopher Anderson
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Ability ◽  
Incremental Validity ◽  
Cognitive Ability Tests ◽  
Ability Tests

An exploration of measurement bias due to worry and emotionality components of test anxiety on cognitive ability tests

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Georgia Papantoniou ◽  
Despina Moraitou ◽  
Dimitra Filippidou ◽  
Magda Dinou ◽  
Effie Katsadima
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Ability ◽  
Test Anxiety ◽  
Measurement Bias ◽  
Cognitive Ability Tests ◽  
Ability Tests

scholarly journals Measurement and structural invariance of cognitive ability tests after computer-based training

2019 ◽  
Vol 93 ◽  
pp. 370-378 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Hermes ◽  
Frank Albers ◽  
Jan R. Böhnke ◽  
Gerrit Huelmann ◽  
Julia Maier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Ability ◽  
Computer Based Training ◽  
Cognitive Ability Tests ◽  
Ability Tests ◽  
Computer Based ◽  
Structural Invariance

scholarly journals Gathering Behavioral Samples Through a Computerized and Standardized Assessment Center Exercise

2010 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 94-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Filip Lievens ◽  
Etienne Van Keer ◽  
Ellen Volckaert
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Ability ◽  
Multiple Choice ◽  
Cost Savings ◽  
Assessment Center ◽  
Incremental Validity ◽  
Standardized Assessment ◽  
Management Competencies ◽  
Lower Response ◽  
Initial Validation

Although computerization and standardization might make assessment center (AC) exercises easier to administer and score, drawbacks are that most of such exercises have a static and multiple-choice format. This study reports on the development and initial validation of a computerized and standardized AC exercise that simulates key managerial tasks. This AC exercise capitalizes not only on the benefits of computerization and standardization (efficiency and cost savings) but at the same time aims to avoid their usual drawbacks (lower response fidelity and interactivity). The composite exercise score was significantly related to several criteria of interest and had incremental validity beyond cognitive ability. The exercise was also significantly related to candidates’ people management competencies.

Retest effects in cognitive ability tests: A meta-analysis

Intelligence ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 67 ◽  
pp. 44-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jana Scharfen ◽  
Judith Marie Peters ◽  
Heinz Holling
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Ability ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cognitive Ability Tests ◽  
Ability Tests

Revisiting predictive bias of cognitive ability tests against Hispanic American job applicants

2019 ◽  
Vol 73 (3) ◽  
pp. 517-542
Author(s):  
Christopher M. Berry ◽  
Peng Zhao ◽  
Juan Carlos Batarse ◽  
Craig Reddock
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Ability ◽  
Job Applicants ◽  
Hispanic American ◽  
Cognitive Ability Tests ◽  
Ability Tests
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document