Event-related potentials increase the discrimination performance of the autonomic-based concealed information test

2011 ◽  
Vol 48 (12) ◽  
pp. 1701-1710 ◽  
Author(s):  
Izumi Matsuda ◽  
Hiroshi Nittono ◽  
Tokihiro Ogawa
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fee-Elisabeth Hein ◽  
Anja Leue

Deception studies emphasize the important role of event-related potentials (ERPs) to uncover deceptive behavior based on underlying neuro-cognitive processes. The role of conflict monitoring as indicated by the frontal N2 component during truthful and deceptive responses was investigated in an adapted Concealed Information Test (CIT). Previously memorized pictures of faces should either be indicated as truthfully trustworthy, truthfully untrustworthy or trustworthy while concealing the actual untrustworthiness (untrustworthy-probe). Mean, baseline-to-peak and peak-to-peak amplitudes were calculated to examine the robustness of ERP findings across varying quantification techniques. Data of 30 participants (15 female; age: M = 23.73 years, SD = 4.09) revealed longer response times and lower correct rates for deceptive compared to truthful trustworthy responses. The frontal N2 amplitude was more negative for untrustworthy-probe and truthful untrustworthy compared to truthful trustworthy stimuli when measured as mean or baseline-to-peak amplitude. Results suggest that deception evokes conflict monitoring and ERP quantifications are differentially sensitive to a-priori hypotheses.


Author(s):  
Ann Hsu ◽  
Yu-Hui Lo ◽  
Shi-Chiang Ke ◽  
Lin Lin ◽  
Philip Tseng

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document