scholarly journals Mutual Fund Family Size and Mutual Fund Performance: The Role of Regulatory Changes

2012 ◽  
Vol 50 (3) ◽  
pp. 647-684 ◽  
Author(s):  
SANJEEV BHOJRAJ ◽  
YOUNG JUN CHO ◽  
NIR YEHUDA
Author(s):  
Joseph S. Chen ◽  
Harrison G. Hong ◽  
Ming Huang ◽  
Jeffrey D. Kubik

2020 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiang Bu ◽  
Jeffrey Forrest

PurposeThe purpose of this study is to investigate whether the direct and indirect sentiment measures are similar in explaining mutual fund performance.Design/methodology/approachThe authors examine the role of direct and indirect sentiment measures on fund performance in two scenarios. One is when a sentiment measure is added to market models, and the other is when it used independently. Also, the authors propose a system science theory to explain the findings.FindingsThe authors find that both direct and indirect sentiment measures are integral to the benchmark models to explain fund performance. However, while the explanatory power of the direct sentiment index is robust when used independently or collectively, the indirect sentiment measures can explain fund performance only when used along with other market factors.Originality/valueGiven the number of sentiment measures, it is critical to determine whether these measures contain the same information of sentiment. This paper represents the first study on this topic.


2008 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 128-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chun-An Li ◽  
Hung-Cheng Lai

We examine the relationship between corporate ownership and fund performance in Taiwan. Using the panel regression after controlling for fund attributes, the proportional share held by foreign institutional investors is positively correlated with fund performance. Furthermore, we also find a negative relationship between the number of board members and the return gap measure of fund performance, but ownership concentration are not effect on fund performance. Our results imply that foreign institutional shareholders are now playing a significant monitoring role of fund companies in Taiwan


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 48-53
Author(s):  
Hafinaz Hasniyanti Hassan ◽  
Nazimah Hussin

Objective - The aim of the study is to identify the determinants of mutual fund performance. Mutual funds have grown in the global financial scene since the 1890s. Past studies have examined various issues associated with mutual funds. However, in Malaysia, mutual fund related studies are rather limited. While most global researches observe the determinants of conventional mutual fund performance, the literature in Malaysia focuses only on a comparison of the performance of mutual funds. Hence, this study aims to fill that gap by providing a framework to assess the determinants of mutual fund performance. More specifically, the study proposes a conceptual framework to determine the effect of historical return, fund governance, timing and selection skills on mutual fund performance. The advancement of the study can be found through the use of theory of performance and mutual fund fees as a mediator in determining the performance of mutual fund fees. Methodology/Technique - A quantitative approach based on secondary data will be used in this study. Multivariate regression analysis and structural equation modelling is also used to evaluate the relationship between the variables. Findings - A conceptual framework is proposed based on the Theory of Performance. The model fit and the mediating role of mutual fund fees will be confirmed after the collection of the research data. It is expected that historical return, fund governance, timing and selection skills will affect mutual fund performance and mutual fund fees will mediate the relationship between the two. Novelty – This study will provide a new perspective on mutual fund performance by using the Theory of Performance. In addition, the mediating role of mutual fund fees is further examined in relation to the specified determinants and mutual fund performance. Type of Paper - Review. Keywords: Mutual Funds; Fees; Performance; Mediator; Theory of Performance. JEL Classification: G10, G11, G19.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document