scholarly journals Increased Cost Effectiveness With Nesiritide vs. Milrinone or Dobutamine in the Treatment of Acute Decompensated Heart Failure

2005 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 311-314 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy Scroggins ◽  
Michelle Edwards ◽  
Reynolds Delgado
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Acute Decompensated Heart Failure ◽  
Decompensated Heart Failure

Sacubitril-valsartan versus enalapril for acute decompensated heart failure: a cost-effectiveness analysis

2019 ◽  
pp. 204748731987895 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kanila Perera ◽  
Zanfina Ademi ◽  
Danny Liew ◽  
Ella Zomer
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Incremental Cost ◽  
Acute Decompensated Heart Failure ◽  
Decompensated Heart Failure ◽  
Quality Adjusted Life Year ◽  
Health States ◽  
Life Years ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Quality Adjusted Life

Background The Comparison of Sacubitril–Valsartan versus Enalapril on Effect on NT-proBNP in Patients Stabilised from an Acute Heart Failure Episode (PIONEER-HF) trial demonstrated significant reductions in N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide. Our study explored the cost-effectiveness of the use of sacubitril-valsartan versus enalapril in acute decompensated heart failure from the Australian healthcare perspective. Methods A Markov model was designed using data from the PIONEER-HF trial to model the clinical progress and costs of patients over a lifetime time horizon. The model consisted of three health states: ‘alive and event-free’, ‘alive after non-fatal hospitalisation for acute decompensated heart failure’ or ‘dead’. Costs and utilities were estimated from published sources. The cost of sacubitril-valsartan (per the Australian pharmaceutical benefits schedule) was AU$7.08/day. Outcomes of interest were the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios in terms of cost per quality-adjusted life year gained and cost per year of life saved. Cost and benefits were discounted at 5.0% per annum. Results Compared to enalapril, sacubitril-valsartan was estimated to cost an additional AU$7464 (discounted) per person, but lead to 0.127 years of life saved (discounted) and 0.096 quality-adjusted life years gained (discounted) over a lifetime analysis. These equated to incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of AU$58,629/year of life saved (US$41,795, EU€58,629, GBP£32,001) and AU$77,889/quality-adjusted life year gained (US$55,526, EU€49,202, GBP£42,504). We have assumed a threshold of AU$50,000/quality-adjusted life year gained to suggest cost-effectiveness. Conclusions At its current acquisition price, sacubitril-valsartan in comparison to enalapril is not likely to be cost-effective in the management of acute decompensated heart failure in Australia. A price reduction of more than 25% would confer cost-effectiveness.

Assessing Acute Decompensated Heart Failure – Strategies and Tools

2012 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 128
Author(s):  
Ali Vazir ◽  
Martin R Cowie ◽  
◽  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Acute Decompensated Heart Failure ◽  
Pulse Contour Analysis ◽  
Decompensated Heart Failure ◽  
Rapid Onset ◽  
Clinical Syndrome ◽  
Response To Therapy ◽  
Contour Analysis ◽  
Physiological Variables ◽  
Co Morbidity

Acute heart failure – the rapid onset of, or change in, signs and/or symptoms of heart failure requiring urgent treatment – is a serious clinical syndrome, associated with high mortality and healthcare costs. History, physical examination and early 2D and Doppler echocardiography are crucial to the proper assessment of patients, and will help determine the appropriate monitoring and management strategy. Most patients are elderly and have considerable co-morbidity. Clinical assessment is key to monitoring progress, but a number of clinical techniques – including simple Doppler and echocardiographic tools, pulse contour analysis and impedance cardiography – can help assess the response to therapy. A pulmonary artery catheter is not a routine monitoring tool, but can be very useful in patients with complex physiology, in those who fail to respond to therapy as would be anticipated, or in those being considered for mechanical intervention. As yet, the serial measurement of plasma natriuretic peptides is of limited value, but it does have a role in diagnosis and prognostication. Increasingly, the remote monitoring of physiological variables by completely implanted devices is possible, but the place of such technology in clinical practice is yet to be clearly established.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document