Assessing Acute Decompensated Heart Failure – Strategies and Tools

2012 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 128
Author(s):  
Ali Vazir ◽  
Martin R Cowie ◽  
◽  

Acute heart failure – the rapid onset of, or change in, signs and/or symptoms of heart failure requiring urgent treatment – is a serious clinical syndrome, associated with high mortality and healthcare costs. History, physical examination and early 2D and Doppler echocardiography are crucial to the proper assessment of patients, and will help determine the appropriate monitoring and management strategy. Most patients are elderly and have considerable co-morbidity. Clinical assessment is key to monitoring progress, but a number of clinical techniques – including simple Doppler and echocardiographic tools, pulse contour analysis and impedance cardiography – can help assess the response to therapy. A pulmonary artery catheter is not a routine monitoring tool, but can be very useful in patients with complex physiology, in those who fail to respond to therapy as would be anticipated, or in those being considered for mechanical intervention. As yet, the serial measurement of plasma natriuretic peptides is of limited value, but it does have a role in diagnosis and prognostication. Increasingly, the remote monitoring of physiological variables by completely implanted devices is possible, but the place of such technology in clinical practice is yet to be clearly established.

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bo Liang ◽  
Rui Li ◽  
Jia-Yue Bai ◽  
Ning Gu

Heart failure is a clinical syndrome, resulting in increased intracardiac pressure and/or decreased cardiac output under rest or stress. In acute decompensated heart failure, volume assessment is essential for clinical diagnosis and management. More and more evidence shows the advantages of bioimpedance vector analysis in this issue. Here, we critically present a brief review of bioimpedance vector analysis in the prediction and management of heart failure to give a reference to clinical physicians and guideline makers.


2009 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 300-304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masanori Konishi ◽  
Yasuhiro Maejima ◽  
Hiroshi Inagaki ◽  
Go Haraguchi ◽  
Hitoshi Hachiya ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 29-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vlad Gheorghiu ◽  
Thomas W. Barkley

Heart failure, a complex clinical syndrome affecting millions of Americans, is associated with high morbidity and mortality and a significant financial burden on the health care system. Recent health care reform efforts have focused on reducing 30-day heart failure hospital readmissions, increasing the cost-effectiveness of care provided to heart failure patients, and improving health outcomes for these patients. This case report describes an acutely ill patient with multiple comorbidities who was not initially admitted for heart failure but who developed acute decompensated heart failure during his hospital stay. The purpose of this in-depth analysis is to discuss the role of bedside nurses and advanced practice nurses in managing heart failure, describe the challenges of identifying secondary heart failure in patients with complex conditions, and suggest methods of improving health-related outcomes to prevent hospital readmissions.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
K.A.I Neoh ◽  
L Sevdynidis ◽  
J Hatherley ◽  
J Tay ◽  
H Douglas ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) is associated with frailty and co-morbidities which influence prognosis. The Rockwood Frailty Score (RFS) and age-adjusted Charlson co-morbidity index (CCI) have been used to predict outcomes in hospitalised ADHF patients. Purpose To describe the relationship of CCI, RFS and clinical risk score -Get With The Guidelines Score (GWTG) with mortality in ADHF treated as outpatients (OP) versus hospitalised inpatients (IP). Methods This retrospective analysis compared 2 cohorts of consecutive ADHF patients - hospitalised in-patients (IP) versus outpatients (OP) who were treated with bolus intravenous diuretics in a specialist heart failure nurse delivered OP HF unit (Ambulatory HF Unit -AHFU) with input from various specialties (renal, palliative, ascitic, pleural teams) from Nov 16 to Dec 17. Mean follow-up duration was similar for both groups (IP=19.5±4.1 months; OP=19.3±3.9 months, p=0.6). Mortality was compared at 1, 3 and 12 months based on RFS (no frailty <5, mild to moderate frailty 5/6, severe frailty - 7 to 9). Results were expressed as mean±SD and analysed using One-Way ANOVA and Chi-squared with Fisher's exact test test. Results 410 consecutive patients (482 admissions) were hospitalised (inpatients -IP) and 231 OP (289 OP visits) were treated in the AHFU. IP group had significantly higher mean CCI (IP=6.55±2; OP=6.10±1.9; p=0.006) and mean RFS (IP 5.2±1.2; OP 4.9±1.1; p=0.002). Mean Clinical Risk Score GWTG was similar (IP=38.9±7.2; OP=38.4±6.6; p=0.44). Mean survival was significantly lower in IP (IP=378±270 days; OP=437±228; P=0.003). As shown in the table higher RFS predicts increased mortality risk (1 month, 3 month and 12 month). Conclusions Rockwood Frailty Score predicts mortality in ADHF and assessment of RFS can play an important role in risk stratifying and decision-making in addition to clinical risk-scores, with regards to suitability for outpatient treatment of ADHF. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document