Anorexia Nervosa and Bulimia Nervosa Perspectives on etiology and cognitive behavior therapy

1990 ◽  
Vol 82 (s361) ◽  
pp. 52-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Inge Jari Staylen ◽  
Jon Chr. Laberg
2001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Z. Steel ◽  
J. Jones ◽  
S Adcock ◽  
R Clancy ◽  
L. Bridgford-West ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 202-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacqueline C. Carter ◽  
Traci L. McFarlane ◽  
Carmen Bewell ◽  
Marion P. Olmsted ◽  
D. Blake Woodside ◽  
...  

1994 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harold Leitenberg ◽  
James C. Rosen ◽  
Jane Wolf ◽  
Linda S. Vara ◽  
Mark J. Detzer ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 0-0
Author(s):  
Evrim Çakmakçı ◽  
Majid Mozafarizadeh ◽  
Seyed Morteza Tayebi ◽  
◽  
◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lian Gu ◽  
Yunling Zou ◽  
Yue Huang ◽  
Qiang Liu ◽  
Han Chen ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The high cost of treatment for anorexia nervosa (AN) and lack of trained specialists have resulted in limited accessibility of effective treatment to patients with AN, which is particularly problematic in China. To increase the accessibility of evidence-based treatment and reduce the cost of treatment, this study aimed to explore the feasibility and efficacy of group cognitive behavior therapy (G-CBT) adapted from enhanced cognitive behavior therapy for eating disorders (CBT-E) in Chinese AN patients. Method A total of 78 patients with AN were assigned to G-CBT or individual outpatient treatment (IOT) and received three months of treatment for AN in each condition. Measures of eating pathology, depression and anxiety were administrated to both intervention groups at three time points: baseline, one month of treatment, and end of treatment; results were compared between groups and over time. Results There were 70 participants included in the final analysis. Both G-CBT and IOT groups showed significant improvement in eating pathology and associated psychopathology (ps < .001) over the course of treatment, but no significant difference in symptom improvement was found between the two groups (ps > .05). G-CBT resulted in additional significant improvement in ED psychopathology over the last two months of treatment, and its overall therapeutic effect was influenced by baseline weight and early symptom improvement. Conclusion Preliminary findings from this open label trial suggest that G-CBT adapted from CBT-E is feasible in an outpatient setting and as effective as IOT in facilitating weight regain and reducing psychopathology in Chinese AN patients with little evidence for the superiority of either intervention. Trial registration: The current study was registered at clinical trials.gov on September 23, 2018 (registration number NCT03684239). Plain English summary People with anorexia nervosa (AN) are known to be unmotivated for treatment and prone to relapse. Recovery from AN often needs intensive, long-term treatment from a specialized multidisciplinary team, which is not accessible for most people in China. Given the increasing incidence of AN and lack of eating disorder (ED) specialists in China, it is important to develop short-term cost-effective treatments for AN. In this study, we explored the feasibility and efficacy of group cognitive behavior therapy (G-CBT) adapted from enhanced cognitive behavior therapy (CBT-E) for people with AN from China. We found that G-CBT was as effective as individual outpatient treatment (IOT) typically provided to AN patients at the research site in facilitating weight regain, improving eating behaviors, and reducing ED and other symptoms. We also found that patients receiving G-CBT made more improvements in cognitive symptoms of the ED, which might help maintain treatment gains and prevent relapse in the long run. This potential long-term advantage of G-CBT needs to be verified in long-term follow-up.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document