Implant-retained oral appliances: a novel treatment for edentulous patients with obstructive sleep apnea?hypopnea syndrome

2007 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 383-387 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aarnoud Hoekema ◽  
Frist de Vries ◽  
Kees Heydenrijk ◽  
Boudewijn Stegenga
2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 01-07
Author(s):  
Guillaume Buiret ◽  
Frederic Chidiac

Objective: Oral appliances are one of the treatments of obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome. The main objective of the study was to determine the efficacy of the Somnodent® oral appliance on Apnea-Hypopnea Index. The secondary objective was to measure the efficacy on other oxymetric parameters and to determine its tolerance and dropout rate. Methods: Efficacy results of the oral appliances based on the apnea hypopnea index, the oxygen desaturation index and the lower oxygen saturation reduction, appliance complications and dropout rates were retrospectively collected from 25 patients with a moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome treated by a Somnodent® oral appliance. The procedure was entirely performed by otolaryngologists. Results: The AHI with OA was more significantly reduced in patients with a higher initial apnea hypopnea index and a higher initial body mass index but reduction was not related to age and not proportional to degree of mandibular advancement. The 50%-AHI reduction rate after OA was 55.6%, the AHI ≤5/h rate after OA was 22.2%. The OA significantly reduced the mean apnea-hypopnea index (-14.3/h, p<10-5). No patient had his AHI increased with oral appliance. One patient stopped using OA mainly because of nausea. Conclusions: Somnodent® is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome.


2007 ◽  
Vol 53 (7) ◽  
pp. 414-419 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teruyo FUKUDA ◽  
Takamitsu MANO ◽  
Kenichiro UCHIDA ◽  
Noriko WADA ◽  
Yoshihide MORI ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 83 (4) ◽  
pp. 653-658 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xu Gong ◽  
Jingjing Zhang ◽  
Ying Zhao ◽  
Xuemei Gao

ABSTRACT Objective: To investigate the long-term efficacy and safety of oral appliances (OAs) in treating obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) by length of treatment. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective study to review the usage of OAs in Chinese OSAHS patients in recent decades. Ninety-four valid questionnaires were returned by 412 patients with OSAHS receiving OA treatment. Among the wearers, 22 agreed to follow-up polysomnography, and 25 agreed to follow-up cephalograms. Tolerance and side effects of OAs were assessed by a survey. Comparisons of efficacy were carried out between the initial and follow-up polysomnography measurements. Cephalometric analysis was used to investigate skeletal and occlusal changes to determine safety of the OAs. Results: The longest treatment extended to 147 months, with a median of 74 months (first and third quartiles, 30 and 99 months, respectively). Among the participants, 14.9% had been treated for more than 120 months. Side effects were temporary and relatively minimal and included tooth soreness (37.2%), dry mouth (33.0%), odd bite feeling (31.9%), and excess salivation (30.8%). Polysomnography proved that OAs remained effective for the treatment of OSAHS in the long term; initial Apnea-Hypopnea Index values were reduced from a median of 24.50 (quartiles, 14.65, 54.05) without the OA to 7.40 with the OA (2.12, 10.00), and follow-up median values were 25.55 without the OA (11.71, 43.65) and 4.25 with the OA (1.38, 7.70). Cephalometric analysis indicated mild and slow changes in the skeleton and occlusion after average treatment duration of 5 years. Conclusion: OAs provided effective and safe long-term therapy for patients with OSAHS. Follow-up supervision is recommended since long-term alterations take place, although these appear to be minimal.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document