Navigation guided socket‐shield technique for implant and pontic sites in the esthetic zone: A proof‐of‐concept 1‐year prospective study with immediate implant placement and loading

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro Pozzi ◽  
Lorenzo Arcuri ◽  
Joseph Kan ◽  
Jimmy Londono
Keyword(s):  
Prospective Study ◽  
Proof Of Concept ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Immediate Implant

Evaluation of Peri-implant Tissue Stability and Patient Satisfaction After Immediate Implant Placement in the Esthetic Area: A 3-Year Follow-up of an Ongoing Prospective Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (5) ◽  
pp. 731-739
Author(s):  
Albert Barroso-Panella ◽  
Octavi Ortiz-Puigpelat ◽  
Pablo Altuna-Fistolera ◽  
Ernest Lucas-Taulé ◽  
Federico Hernández-Alfaro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Prospective Study ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Immediate Implant ◽  
Esthetic Area

Effect of the Different Implant Protocols on Peri-Implant Bone: A 6-Month Prospective Study in Beagle Dogs

2017 ◽  
Vol 40 (12) ◽  
pp. 701-708
Author(s):  
Dandan Song ◽  
Hui Zheng ◽  
Yan Huang ◽  
Xucheng Ma ◽  
Guowu Ma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Loss ◽  
Prospective Study ◽  
Immediate Loading ◽  
Intraoral Radiography ◽  
Beagle Dogs ◽  
Marginal Bone Loss ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Immediate Implant ◽  
Delayed Implant Placement

Objective To compare the effects of different implant placement and loading protocols on the marginal bone loss (MBL) in beagles by intraoral radiography. Methods and materials 61 dental implants were inserted on 9 beagle dogs at bilateral lower posteriors according to 8 different protocols: immediate implant placement and immediate loading for 3 months (IIP + IL3) or 6 months (IIP + IL6) and unloading (IIP + UL), immediate implant placement and delayed loading for 3 months (IIP + DL3) or 6 months (IIP + DL6), delayed implant placement and immediate loading for 3 months (DIP + IL3) or delayed loading for 3 months (DIP + DL3) and unloading (DIP + UL). Intraoral radiography was performed to analyze the MBL during each surgery, before and after the implant placement and at 3-month intervals after the procedure. Results In total, 57 samples were included. There was less MBL (p<0.05) in the IIP + IL3 group (1.22 ± 0.63 mm) compared to the DIP + IL3 group (1.89 ± 0.9 mm). The longer the loading time, the more bone loss appeared in the IIP + IL group; however, the results were reversed in the IIP + DL group. The MBL during the latter 3-month period was dramatically decreased compared to the former 3-month period in the IIP + DL3 group (p<0.05). Conclusions The IIP + IL group seems superior to the DL protocol and the MBL changed significantly during the first three months and thereafter became stable.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document