Evaluation of Peri-implant Tissue Stability and Patient Satisfaction After Immediate Implant Placement in the Esthetic Area: A 3-Year Follow-up of an Ongoing Prospective Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (5) ◽  
pp. 731-739
Author(s):  
Albert Barroso-Panella ◽  
Octavi Ortiz-Puigpelat ◽  
Pablo Altuna-Fistolera ◽  
Ernest Lucas-Taulé ◽  
Federico Hernández-Alfaro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Prospective Study ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Immediate Implant ◽  
Esthetic Area

scholarly journals Clinical efficacy of mineralized collagen (MC) versus anorganic bovine bone (Bio-Oss) for immediate implant placement in esthetic area: a single-center retrospective study

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan Dai ◽  
Jin Xu ◽  
Xiao-Hui Han ◽  
Fu-Zhai Cui ◽  
Dong-Sheng Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Clinical Efficacy ◽  
Bovine Bone ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Immediate Implant ◽  
Esthetic Area ◽  
Mineralized Collagen

Abstract Background The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of mineralized collagen (MC) versus anorganic bovine bone (Bio-Oss) for immediate implant placement in esthetic area. Methods Medical records of Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery of Shandong Provincial Hospital were screened for patients who had been treated with immediate implant implantation in the esthetic area using either MC (Allgens®, Beijing Allgens Medical Science and Technology Co., Ltd., China) or Bio-Oss (Bio-Oss®, Geistlich Biomaterials, Wolhusen, Switzerland), between January 2018 and December 2019. All patients fulfilling the in-/exclusion criteria and following followed for a minimum period of 1 year after surgery were enrolled into the presented study. Implant survival rate, radiographic, esthetic and patient satisfactory evaluations were performed. Results Altogether, 70 patients were included in the study; a total of 80 implants were inserted. All implants had good initial stability. The survival rate of implants was 100% at 1-year follow-up. The differences in horizontal and vertical bone loss between the MC group (0.72 ± 0.26 mm, 1.62 ± 0.84 mm) and the Bio-Oss group (0.70 ± 0.52 mm, 1.57 ± 0.88 mm) were no significant difference statistically no significant 6 months after permanent restoration. Similar results occurred at 12 months after permanent restoration functional loaded. Clinical acceptability defined by pink esthetic score (PES) ≥ 6 (6.07 ± 1.62 vs. 6.13 ± 1.41) was not significantly different between groups. Patient satisfaction estimated by visual analog scale (VAS) was similar (8.56 ± 1.12 vs. 8.27 ± 1.44), and the difference was no significant difference between the two groups. Conclusions The biomimetic MC showed a similar behaviour as Bio-Oss not only in its dimensional tissues changes but also in clinical acceptability and patient satisfaction. Within the limitations of this study, these cases show that MC could be considered as an alternative bone graft in IIP

scholarly journals Immediate Placement and Restoration of a New Tapered Implant System in the Aesthetic Region: A Report of Three Cases

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Caroliene M. Meijndert ◽  
Gerry M. Raghoebar ◽  
Arjan Vissink ◽  
Henny J. A. Meijer
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Soft Tissues ◽  
Mean Value ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Bone Level ◽  
Immediate Implant ◽  
The Aesthetic ◽  
One Year ◽  
Implant System

Objective. To assess the clinical, radiographic, aesthetic, and patient-centred outcomes of a new implant system applied for an immediate implant placement and restoration approach in single tooth replacement of anterior maxillary teeth. Material and Method. Three cases were treated with a bone level tapered implant. All patients were treated with the same strategy involving flapless extraction and implant placement with simultaneous augmentation. Implants were provisionally restored with a screw-retained restoration at the day of surgery. Definitive restoration was fabricated after 3 months. Follow-up was one year after definitive restoration. Results. At the 1-year follow-up, the implants were stable and no complications had occurred. Peri-implant bone levels had increased with a mean value of 0.24±0.30 mm between definitive restoration placement and 1 year of follow-up. Clinical outcome scores showed healthy soft tissues. Mean Pink and White Esthetic scores were rated 7.0 and 7.3, respectively. Mean patient satisfaction had improved from 55.7 (pretreatment) to 90.0 (1-year follow-up) on a 0-100 VAS scale. Conclusion. Immediate implant placement and restoration with the new tapered bone level implant system are accompanied by good initial clinical and radiographic results as well as high patient satisfaction.

Digital workflow for image-guided immediate implant placement by using the socket-shield technique and custom abutment in the esthetic area

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan Jony de Moura e Costa ◽  
Shaban Burgoa ◽  
Otavio Henrique Pinhata-Baptista ◽  
Virgilio Gutierrez ◽  
Arthur Rodriguez Gonzalez Cortes
Keyword(s):  
Digital Workflow ◽  
Image Guided ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Immediate Implant ◽  
Esthetic Area

Aesthetic rehabilitation with immediate implant placement in anterior maxilla after traumatic avulsive injury. A case report

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fahad Umer ◽  
Saqib Habib
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Cortical Plate ◽  
Radiographic Examination ◽  
Incisor Tooth ◽  
Anterior Maxilla ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Immediate Implant ◽  
And Function ◽  
Variable Clinical Presentation

Traumatic oral injuries present their own unique restorative challenges to the clinician due to their variable clinical presentation. In such cases, achieving optimum aesthetics and function in the maxillary aesthetic zone is challenging. This case report describes the rehabilitation of a patient with immediate implant placement after suffering trauma to the oral cavity resulting in a complete loss (avulsion) of a permanent central incisor tooth. In order to preserve the existing soft and hard tissue and to achieve predictable and aesthetically pleasing results, we decided to place an immediate implant as opposed to replantation of the avulsed tooth. Flapless implant surgery was planned and a dental implant (Bio horizons Implant Systems, Inc.) was placed following non-submerged protocol. At six month’s follow-up, the clinical and radiographic examination revealed a well osseo-integrated implant with an intact buccal cortical plate. Continuous...

scholarly journals Immediate Implant Placement by Interradicular Bone Drilling before Molar Extraction: Clinical Case Report with One-Year Follow-Up

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stuardo Valenzuela ◽  
José M. Olivares ◽  
Nicolás Weiss ◽  
Dafna Benadof
Keyword(s):  
Survival Rates ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Primary Stability ◽  
Bone Drilling ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Immediate Implants ◽  
Immediate Implant ◽  
One Year ◽  
Molar Extraction

The placement of immediate implants in the posterior sector is a widespread procedure where the success and survival rates are similar to those of traditional protocols. It has several anatomical challenges, such as the presence of interradicular bone septa that hinder a correct three-dimensional positioning of the implant and may compromise primary stability and/or cause damage of neighboring structures. The aim of this article is to present the treatment and the one-year clinical follow-up of a patient who received immediate implant placement using an interradicular bone-drilling technique before the molar extraction.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document