scholarly journals High-resolution impedance manometry parameters enhance the esophageal motility evaluation in non-obstructive dysphagia patients without a major Chicago Classification motility disorder

2016 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. e12941 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. A. Carlson ◽  
T. Omari ◽  
Z. Lin ◽  
N. Rommel ◽  
K. Starkey ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 19 ◽  
pp. 998-1003
Author(s):  
Han Sin Boo ◽  
Ian Chik ◽  
Chai Soon Ngiu ◽  
Shyang Yee Lim ◽  
Razman Jarmin

2017 ◽  
Vol 08 (02) ◽  
pp. 068-071
Author(s):  
Rinkesh Kumar Bansal ◽  
Mukesh Nasa ◽  
Gaurav Kumar Patil ◽  
Vinit Shah ◽  
Narendra S. Choudhary ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Aims and Objective: High‑resolution esophageal manometry is the most important investigation for the evaluation of patients with dysphagia and noncardiac chest pain (NCCP). Chicago Classification (CC) utilizing an algorithmic approach in analyzing high‑resolution manometry has been accepted worldwide, and an updated version, CC v3.0, of this classification has been developed by the International high‑resolution manometry working Group in 2014. Data on the spectrum of esophageal motility disorders in Indian population are scarce as well as a newer version of CC has not been used to classify. The aim of our study is to evaluate clinical presentation and manometric profile of patients with suspected esophageal motility disorders using CC v3.0. Methodology: In this retrospective study, consecutive patients referred for esophageal manometry at our center from 2010 to 2015 were included in the study. High‑resolution esophageal manometry was performed with 22‑channel water‑perfusion system (MMS, The Netherlands). Newer version of CC (CC v3.0) was used to classify motility disorders. Results: A total of 400 patients were included, with a mean age of 44 years and 67.5% were males. Out of these, 60% (n = 240) patients presented with motor dysphagia while 40% (n = 160) had NCCP. Motility disorder was present in 50.5% (n = 202) of the patients while 49.5% (n = 198) patients had normal manometry. Disorders of esophagogastric junction outflow were the predominant type of disorder, found in 33.75% (n = 135). About 14.25% (n = 57) of the patients had minor disorders of peristalsis while 5% (n = 20) of the patients had other major disorders of peristalsis. Achalasia was the most common motility disorder present in 30% (n = 120) patients. Conclusion: Dysphagia was the most common esophageal symptom followed by NCCP in our series. Achalasia was the most common esophageal motility disorder followed by fragmented peristalsis.


2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rena Yadlapati ◽  
Peter J. Kahrilas ◽  
Mark R. Fox ◽  
Albert J. Bredenoord ◽  
C. Prakash Gyawali ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 439-442 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fernando Augusto Herbella ◽  
Priscila Rodrigues Armijo ◽  
Marco Giuseppe Patti

ABSTRACT High resolution manometry changed several esophageal motility paradigms. The 3.0 Chicago Classification defined manometric criteria for named esophageal motility disorders. We present a pictorial atlas of motility disorders. Achalasia types, esophagogastric junction obstruction, absent contractility, distal esophageal spasm, hypercontractile esophagus (jackhammer), ineffective esophageal motility, and fragmented peristalsis are depicted with high-resolution manometry plots.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document