Spastic Motility Disorders: Diagnosis and Management in the Era of the Chicago Classification

Spastic esophageal motility disorders are represented, as per the Chicago classification 4.0, by diffuse esophageal spasm and hypercontractile esophagus. They are very rare and therefore poorly understood. The diagnosis is usually made by manometry in presence of dysphagia or chest pain, but often it is often an unexpected finding. In this paper, the authors review the current knowledge and possible treatments of these disorders, when needed. They underline that invasive treatments, as surgical myotomy or POEM, are rarely necessary and that the indications for them are based on low quality studies. Therefore, they should be used with extreme caution in treating spastic motility disorders other than achalasia.

807 ASSOCIATION OF BOLUS TRANSIT TIME ON BARIUM ESOPHAGOGRAM WITH ESOPHAGEAL PERISTALSIS

The threshold criteria for diagnosing ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) has changed over the years and is based on the proportion of failed and weak peristalses. Bolus transit time (BTT) on barium esophagogram (BE) can intuitively be the ‘gold standard' for assessing the effectiveness of esophageal peristalsis. The aim of this study was to associate upright and prone BTT with esophageal peristalsis and dysphagia in patients with normal lower esophageal sphincter (LES) parameters. Methods Patients with normal LES on high-resolution manometry (HRM) who also had a standard-protocol BE from 2017 to 2020 were included. Patients with previous foregut surgery, hiatal hernia, jackhammer esophagus, distal esophageal spasm, fragmented peristalsis, and those with < or > 10 single swallows on HRM were excluded. Based on the number of normal swallows (DCI >450 mmHg.s.cm), the patients were divided into 11 groups (10 normal to 0 normal). Upright and prone BTT were measured on BE. Fractional polynomial and logistic regression analysis were used to study association (along with rate of change) between BTT, dysphagia, and peristalsis. Results In total, 146 patients met the inclusion criteria. Prone BTT increased in tandem with a decrease in the number of normal peristalses (p < 0.001), but no difference was noted in upright BTT (p = 0.317). Two deflection points were noted on the association between peristalsis and prone BTT at 50%, 40 seconds and 30%, 80 seconds on the y and x-axes, respectively, after which declining peristaltic function was independent of prone BTT. Patients with prone BTT >40 seconds had nearly 6-fold higher odds of having zero normal peristalses (p = 0.002). Increasing prone BTT was associated with increasing dysphagia (p < 0.05). Conclusion Prone, but not upright BTT, correlates with the proportion of normal esophageal peristalses and dysphagia. The phenotype of abnormal swallows (failed, weak) appears to have minimal impact on BTT. The current perspective of manometric classification may need to be adjusted to use the proportion of normal peristalses as a criterion.

The Impact of Medications on Esophageal Motility

The purpose of this review is to highlight the impact of common medications on esophageal motility. Esophageal motility is mediated through a complex network of neural innervation. Opioids lead to excitatory esophageal motor abnormalities termed opioid-induced esophageal dysfunction or OIED. Prokinetics have mixed effects on esophageal motility. Nitrates and calcium channel blockers relax esophageal smooth muscle, but they are limited clinically due to side effects. Sildenafil also relaxes smooth muscle, but it is costly. Peppermint oil may reduce distal esophageal spasm. Anticholinergics, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, estrogen, and cannabis need further study to evaluate their effects on esophageal motility.

Manometrically jackhammer esophagus with fluoroscopically/endoscopically distal esophageal spasm: a case report

Background Jackhammer esophagus is a rare esophageal motility disorder that can result in dysphagia, chest pain, and gastro-esophageal reflux symptoms. High-resolution manometry is the gold standard for diagnosis, while corkscrew esophagus on upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is an uncommon manifestation. Case presentation 72-year-old man who presented with progressive dysphagia for three months without symptoms of chest pain or heartburn. Initial workup showed a corkscrew esophagus on upper gastrointestinal endoscopy; subsequently, high-resolution manometry revealed an esophago-gastric junction outflow obstruction with hypercontractile (jackhammer) esophagus. Treatment with calcium channel blockers and proton pump inhibitors was successful and relieved his symptoms near completion. Conclusions Even though the corkscrew esophagus is typically for distal esophageal spasm, the hypercontractile (jackhammer) esophagus can appear. The high-resolution manometry can help to distinguish each specific motility disorder.

Necrotizing Esophagitis: A Big Squeeze?

Necrotizing esophagitis is rare and poorly understood. The etiologies reported in what little has been published (i.e., gastroesophageal reflux exacerbated by gastric outlet obstruction and low-flow ischemia) seem somewhat simplistic and lack any direct evidence. The following paper illustrates a recent clinical case while laying out arguments supporting esophageal spasm as a possible contributing factor.

374 VIDEO ESOPHAGOGRAM CORRELATES OF DYSPHAGIA IN PATIENTS WITH NORMAL LOWER ESOPHAGEAL SPHINCTER

Dysphagia is a common foregut symptom. However, there is poor association between non-obstructive dysphagia and esophageal body peristaltic parameters in patients with normal lower esophageal sphincters (LES). The objective of this retrospective study was to study bolus transit patterns noted on barium esophagogram in patients experiencing dysphagia. Methods After IRB approval, we queried our esophageal database for patients with normal manometric LES. Jackhammer esophagus, esophageal spasm, previous foregut surgery, and unavailable foregut symptom questionnaires were exclusion criteria. Patients were grouped based on reported dysphagia: 0 = None; 1 = Mild; 2 = Moderate; 3 = Severe/very severe. All barium esophagograms were re-evaluated. Bolus esophageal transit time was studied with patients in both upright and prone positions, using live time stamps at bolus entry/exit. “Barium residue” was defined as persistent contrast on the esophageal wall after bolus exit. “Retrograde escape” referred to barium escaping proximally from the bolus into previously cleared esophagus. ANOVA and χ2 were used. Results In all, 150 patients met inclusion criteria. 76 (50.1%) were women. Mean age and body mass index were 58.4 ± 14.7 years and 22.9 ± 10.4 kg/m2, respectively. The number of patients in each dysphagia group (0, 1, 2, and 3) were 82(54.7%), 29(19.3%), 25(16.7%) and 14(9.3%), respectively. The difference in mean bolus transit time among dysphagia groups was statistically significant in prone-position swallows (39.3 ± 36.7, 75 ± 74.8, 98.8 ± 85 and 69.6 ± 43.7 seconds; p < 0.001) but not in upright-position swallows (14.6 ± 22, 12.4 ± 8.1, 14.3 ± 8.8 and 12.6 ± 8.2 seconds; p = 0.929; Fig. 1). The prevalence of residual contrast and retrograde escape in prone swallows were comparable among patients reporting dysphagia (p = 0.444, p = 0.173). Conclusion Bolus transit time in prone-position barium swallows is simple to assess, and correlates with dysphagia reported by patients with normal lower esophageal sphincters. However, further studies with comprehensive dysphagia score are needed.

373 ESOPHAGEAL BODY PERISTALSIS IN PATIENTS WITH NORMAL LOWER ESOPHAGEAL SPHINCTER: ARE VIDEO ESOPHAGOGRAM AND HIGH-RESOLUTION MANOMETRY IN AGREEMENT?

Peristaltic disorders of the esophageal body have been categorized according to how they appear on high-resolution manometry. Abnormalities in peristalsis may lead to abnormal esophageal clearance and dysphagia. The aim of our retrospective analysis was to study bolus transit patterns on barium esophagogram in patients with various grades of esophageal body peristalsis as diagnosed by high-resolution manometry. Methods After Institutional Review Board approval, we queried an esophageal center database to identify patients with normal lower esophageal sphincter parameters. Patients with jackhammer esophagus, esophageal spasm, previous foregut surgery, hiatal hernia, and fragmented peristalsis were excluded. Remaining patients were divided into 11 groups based on their percentages of normal swallows out of 10 swallows (0%–100% swallows normal, DCI > 450 mmHg.s.cm). All previously obtained video esophagograms were re-evaluated in blinded fashion. Bolus transit time through the esophagus was measured in upright and prone positions, using live time stamps at the entry and exit of the bolus. ANOVA and χ2 were used. Results In total, 146 patients were included in the analysis. 73 (50%) were men. Mean age and body mass index were 58.4 ± 14.7 years and 22.8 ± 10.4 kg/m2, respectively. Bolus transit time in prone-position swallows increased in tandem with increases in number of abnormal swallows (11.3 ± 3.7, 22 ± 15.5, 29.5 ± 24.3, 42.7 ± 39.5, 42.4 ± 46.9, 64 ± 70.8, 59.4 ± 34.6, 58.8 ± 37.9, 110 ± 66.6, 83.2 ± 49.6 and 105.6 ± 72.5 seconds, p < 0.0001) but no difference was noted in upright-position bolus transit time (p = 0.317). There was a dropoff in level of significance at Group 5 (60% swallows normal) compared to Group 11 (absent contractility), after which there were no inter-group differences (Fig. 1). Conclusion Bolus transit time in prone-position swallows progressively increases as percentage of normal swallows decreases. Further work associated with symptoms to define a cutoff between normal and ineffective peristalsis would be useful.