scholarly journals P11‐2: Clinical profiles and respiratory system mechanics of mechanically ventilated patients with COVID‐19 versus non‐COVID‐19‐associated ARDS

Respirology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (S3) ◽  
pp. 408-408
1991 ◽  
Vol 71 (6) ◽  
pp. 2425-2433 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Polese ◽  
A. Rossi ◽  
L. Appendini ◽  
G. Brandi ◽  
J. H. Bates ◽  
...  

In ten mechanically ventilated patients, six with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and four with pulmonary edema, we have partitioned the total respiratory system mechanics into the lung (l) and chest wall (w) mechanics using the esophageal balloon technique together with the airway occlusion technique during constant-flow inflation (J. Appl. Physiol. 58: 1840–1848, 1985). Intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEPi) was present in eight patients (range 1.1–9.8 cmH2O) and was due mainly to PEEPi,L (80%), with a minor contribution from PEEPi,w (20%), on the average. The increase in respiratory elastance and resistance was determined mainly by abnormalities in lung elastance and resistance. Chest wall elastance was slightly abnormal (7.3 +/- 2.2 cmH2O/l), and chest wall resistance contributed only 10%, on the average, to the total. The work performed by the ventilator to inflate the lung (WL) averaged 2.04 +/- 0.59 and 1.25 +/- 0.21 J/l in COPD and pulmonary edema patients, respectively, whereas Ww was approximately 0.4 J/l in both groups, i.e., close to normal values. We conclude that, in mechanically ventilated patients, abnormalities in total respiratory system mechanics essentially reflect alterations in lung mechanics. However, abnormalities in chest wall mechanics can be relevant in some COPD patients with a high degree of pulmonary hyperinflation.


2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Glaciele Xavier ◽  
César Augusto Melo-Silva ◽  
Carlos Eduardo Ventura Gaio dos Santos ◽  
Veronica Moreira Amado

ABSTRACT Objective: To investigate the accuracy of chest auscultation in detecting abnormal respiratory mechanics. Methods: We evaluated 200 mechanically ventilated patients in the immediate postoperative period after cardiac surgery. We assessed respiratory system mechanics - static compliance of the respiratory system (Cst,rs) and respiratory system resistance (R,rs) - after which two independent examiners, blinded to the respiratory system mechanics data, performed chest auscultation. Results: Neither decreased/abolished breath sounds nor crackles were associated with decreased Cst,rs (≤ 60 mL/cmH2O), regardless of the examiner. The overall accuracy of chest auscultation was 34.0% and 42.0% for examiners A and B, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of chest auscultation for detecting decreased/abolished breath sounds or crackles were 25.1% and 68.3%, respectively, for examiner A, versus 36.4% and 63.4%, respectively, for examiner B. Based on the judgments made by examiner A, there was a weak association between increased R,rs (≥ 15 cmH2O/L/s) and rhonchi or wheezing (ϕ = 0.31, p < 0.01). The overall accuracy for detecting rhonchi or wheezing was 89.5% and 85.0% for examiners A and B, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity for detecting rhonchi or wheezing were 30.0% and 96.1%, respectively, for examiner A, versus 10.0% and 93.3%, respectively, for examiner B. Conclusions: Chest auscultation does not appear to be an accurate diagnostic method for detecting abnormal respiratory mechanics in mechanically ventilated patients in the immediate postoperative period after cardiac surgery.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document