Stability of Reconstructed Paralyzed Shoulders Using a Reflected Long Head Biceps Technique

1999 ◽  
Vol 123 (3) ◽  
pp. 227-233 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Y. Tang ◽  
A. F. T. Mak ◽  
L. K. Hung ◽  
H. S. Wong ◽  
T. Pacaldo

A new tendon transfer technique is proposed for the reconstruction of the paralyzed shoulders secondary to Brachial Plexus Injury (BPI). In this tendon transfer, the long head of the biceps tendons is utilized as a bridging tendon graft. It is reflected at the exit of the bicipital groove, passed through the deltoid and directed to the trapezius. The technique is referred to here as the Reflected Long Head Bicepts (RLHB) technique. This study evaluated the effect of this tendon transfer on the anterior, posterior, and inferior stability of the reconstructed should using cadaveric specimens. It was shown that loading of the RLHB contributed significantly to anterior stability of the reconstructed shoulder for 90 deg elevation in the scapula plane. The mean displacement was reduced by 56 percent with RLHB loaded (p<0.01), by 56 percent with the rotator cuff loaded (p<0.005), and by 67 percent with both the RLHB and the rotator cuff loaded (p<0.004). For the post-operation conditions, variation of the directions of RLHB had no significant effect on joint displacement in response to anterior loading. The RLHB tendon also contributed to the posterior and inferior stability for the low and middle elevations in the plane of scapula. Two variations of the RLHB tendon transfer procedures, namely the “Sub-Deltoid” and the “Through-Deltoid” techniques, were introduced and studied. These two techniques did not seem to have significantly different effects on the displacement of the humeral head in response to both posterior and inferior loading. The results of this study seemed to support the clinical feasibility of this tendon transfer approach as far as the biomedical stability of the reconstruction is concerned.

2012 ◽  
Vol 20 (12) ◽  
pp. 2553-2558 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angelo De Carli ◽  
Antonio Vadalà ◽  
Edoardo Zanzotto ◽  
Guido Zampar ◽  
Mario Vetrano ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. e1683-e1688
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Milano ◽  
Giacomo Marchi ◽  
Giuseppe Bertoni ◽  
Niccolò Vaisitti ◽  
Stefano Galli ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Lakemeier ◽  
Johannes JA Reichelt ◽  
Nina Timmesfeld ◽  
Susanne Fuchs-Winkelmann ◽  
Juergen RJ Paletta ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. e125
Author(s):  
Marcin Kowalczuk ◽  
Kevin T. Kohut ◽  
Soheil Sabzevari ◽  
Jan-Hendrik Naendrup ◽  
Albert Lin

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. e473-e478 ◽  
Author(s):  
Krzysztof Hermanowicz ◽  
Adrian Góralczyk ◽  
Konrad Malinowski ◽  
Piotr Jancewicz ◽  
Marcin E. Domżalski

2009 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 279-282 ◽  
Author(s):  
U. S. Chung ◽  
J. H. Kim ◽  
W. S. Seo ◽  
K. H. Lee

We evaluated the clinical outcome of tendon reconstruction using tendon graft or tendon transfer and the parameters related to clinical outcome in 51 wrists of 46 patients with rheumatoid arthritis with finger extensor tendon ruptures. At a mean follow-up of 5.6 years, the mean metacarpophalangeal (MP) joint extension lag was 8° (range, 0–45) and the mean visual analogue satisfaction scale was 74 (range, 10–100). Clinical outcome did not differ significantly between tendon grafting and tendon transfer. The MP joint extension lag correlated with the patient’s satisfaction score, but the pulp-to-palm distance did not correlate with patient satisfaction. We conclude that both tendon grafting and tendon transfer are reliable reconstruction methods for ruptured finger extensor tendons in rheumatoid hands.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document