scholarly journals Second Moment Closure Modeling and DNS of Stratified Shear Layers

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naman Jain ◽  
Xinyi Huang ◽  
Xiang Yang ◽  
Robert Kunz ◽  
Hieu T. Pham ◽  
...  

Abstract Buoyant shear layers are encountered in many engineering and environmental applications, and have been studied by researchers in the context of experiments and modeling for decades. Often, these flows have high Reynolds and Richardson numbers, and this leads to significant/intractable space-time resolution requirements for DNS or LES modeling. On the other hand, many of the important physical mechanisms in these systems, such as stress anisotropy, wake stabilization, and regime transition, inherently render eddy viscosity-based RANS modeling inappropriate. Accordingly, we pursue second-moment closure (SMC), i.e., full Reynolds stress/flux/variance modeling, for moderate Reynolds number non-stratified, and stratified shear layers for which DNS is possible. A range of sub-model complexity is pursued for the diffusion of stresses, density fluxes and variance, pressure strain and scrambling, and dissipation. These sub-models are evaluated in terms of how well they are represented by DNS in comparison to the exact Reynolds averaged terms, and how well they impact the accuracy of the full RANS closure. For the non-stratified case, the SMC model predicts the shear layer growth rate and Reynolds shear stress profiles accurately. Stress anisotropy and budgets are captured only qualitatively. Comparing DNS of exact and modeled terms, inconsistencies in model performance and assumptions are observed, including inaccurate prediction of individual statistics, non-negligible pressure diffusion, and dissipation anisotropy. For the stratified case, shear layer and gradient Richardson number growth rates, and stress, flux and variance decay rates, are captured with less accuracy than corresponding flow parameters in the non-stratified case. These studies lead to several recommendations for model improvement.

Author(s):  
Naman Jain ◽  
Hieu Pham ◽  
Xinyi Huang ◽  
Sutanu Sarkar ◽  
Xiang Yang ◽  
...  

Abstract Buoyant shear layers encountered in many engineering and environmental applications have been studied by researchers for decades. Often, these flows have high Reynolds and Richardson numbers, which leads to significant/intractable space-time resolution requirements for DNS or LES. On the other hand, many of the important physical mechanisms, such as stress anisotropy, wake stabilization, and regime transition, inherently render eddy viscosity-based RANS modeling inappropriate. Accordingly, we pursue second-moment closure (SMC), i.e., full Reynolds stress/flux/variance modeling, for moderate Reynolds number non-stratified, and stratified shear layers for which DNS is possible. A range of sub-model complexity is pursued for the diffusion of stresses, density fluxes and variance, pressure strain and scrambling, and dissipation. These sub-models are evaluated in terms of how well they are represented by DNS in comparison to the exact Reynolds averaged terms, and how well they impact the accuracy of full RANS closure. For the non-stratified case, SMC model predicts the shear layer growth rate and Reynolds shear stress profiles accurately. Stress anisotropy and budgets are captured only qualitatively. Comparing DNS of exact and modeled terms, inconsistencies in model performance and assumptions are observed, including inaccurate prediction of individual statistics, non-negligible pressure diffusion, and dissipation anisotropy. For the stratified case, shear layer and gradient Richardson number growth rates, and stress, flux and variance decay rates, are captured with less accuracy than corresponding flow parameters in the non-stratified case. These studies lead to several recommendations for model improvement.


AIAA Journal ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 35 ◽  
pp. 825-831
Author(s):  
Dirk G. Pfuderer ◽  
Claus Eifert ◽  
Johannes Janicka

1999 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hamn-Ching Chen ◽  
Gengsheng Wei ◽  
Je-Chin Han

Abstract A multiblock Favre-Averaged Navier-Stokes (FANS) method has been developed in conjunction with a chimera domain decomposition technique for investigation of flat surface, discrete-hole film cooling performance. The finite-analytic method solves the FANS equations in conjunction with a near-wall second-order Reynolds stress (second-moment) closure model and a two-layer k-ε model. Comparisons of flow fields and turbulence quantities with experimental data clearly demonstrate the capability of the near-wall second-moment closure model for accurate resolution of the complex flow interaction bewteen the coolant jet and the mainstream. The near-wall second-moment anisotropic model provides better agreement in adiabatic film effectiveness prediction than the two-layer k-ε model.


1988 ◽  
Vol 110 (2) ◽  
pp. 216-221 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Fu ◽  
P. G. Huang ◽  
B. E. Launder ◽  
M. A. Leschziner

Computations are reported for three axisymmetric turbulent jets, two of which are swirling and one containing swirl-induced recirculation, obtained with two models of turbulence: a differential second-moment (DSM) closure and an algebraic derivative thereof (ASM). The models are identical in respect of all turbulent processes except that, in the ASM scheme, stress transport is represented algebraically in terms of the transport of turbulence energy. The comparison of the results thus provides a direct test of how well the model of stress transport adopted in ASM schemes simulates that of the full second-moment closure. The comparison indicates that the ASM hypothesis seriously misrepresents the diffusive transport of the shear stress in nonswirling axisymmetric flows, while in the presence of swirl the defects extend to all stress components and are aggravated by a failure to account for influential (additive) swirl-related stress-transport terms in the algebraic modelling process. The principal conclusion thus drawn is that in free shear flows where transport effects are significant, it is advisable to adopt a full second-moment closure if turbulence modelling needs to proceed beyond the eddy-viscosity level.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document