Speech production changes and intelligibility with a real-time cochlear implant simulator

2014 ◽  
Vol 136 (4) ◽  
pp. 2313-2313
Author(s):  
Lily Talesnick ◽  
Elizabeth D. Casserly
1971 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 397-409 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel E. Stark

Real-time amplitude contour and spectral displays were used in teaching speech production skills to a profoundly deaf, nonspeaking boy. This child had a visual attention problem, a behavior problem, and a poor academic record. In individual instruction, he was first taught to produce features of speech, for example, friction, nasal, and stop, which are present in vocalizations of 6- to 9-month-old infants, and then to combine these features in syllables and words. He made progress in speech, although sign language and finger spelling were taught at the same time. Speech production skills were retained after instruction was terminated. The results suggest that deaf children are able to extract information about the features of speech from visual displays, and that a developmental sequence should be followed as far as possible in teaching speech production skills to them.


2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 1156-1162
Author(s):  
Anirudh Gautam ◽  
Jason A. Brant ◽  
Michael J. Ruckenstein ◽  
Steven J. Eliades

1996 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 604-610 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy Tye-Murray ◽  
Linda Spencer ◽  
Elizabeth Gilbert Bedia ◽  
George Woodworth

Twenty children who have worn a Cochlear Corporation cochlear implant for an average of 33.6 months participated in a device-on/off experiment. They spoke 14 monosyllabic words three times each after having not worn their cochlear implant speech processors for several hours. They then spoke the same speech sample again with their cochlear implants turned on. The utterances were phonetically transcribed by speech-language pathologists. On average, no difference between speaking conditions on indices of vowel height, vowel place, initial consonant place, initial consonant voicing, or final consonant voicing was found. Comparisons based on a narrow transcription of the speech samples revealed no difference between the two speaking conditions. Children who were more intelligible were no more likely to show a degradation in their speech production in the device-off condition than children who were less intelligible. In the device-on condition, children sometimes nasalized their vowels and inappropriately aspirated their consonants. Their tendency to nasalize vowels and aspirate initial consonants might reflect an attempt to increase proprioceptive feedback, which would provide them with a greater awareness of their speaking behavior.


2018 ◽  
Vol 52 ◽  
pp. 1-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vikram Ramanarayanan ◽  
Sam Tilsen ◽  
Michael Proctor ◽  
Johannes Töger ◽  
Louis Goldstein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2014 ◽  
Vol 136 (3) ◽  
pp. 1307-1311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shrikanth Narayanan ◽  
Asterios Toutios ◽  
Vikram Ramanarayanan ◽  
Adam Lammert ◽  
Jangwon Kim ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document