Synthesis, Molecular, and Crystal Structure of Tris(2-carbamoylmethoxyphenyl)phosphine Oxide

2020 ◽  
Vol 90 (10) ◽  
pp. 1840-1844
Author(s):  
T. V. Baulina ◽  
I. Yu. Kudryavtsev ◽  
A. V. Artem’ev ◽  
I. Yu. Bagryanskaya ◽  
M. P. Pasechnik ◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Vol 448 (2) ◽  
pp. 55-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Yu. Kudryavtsev ◽  
T. V. Baulina ◽  
V. N. Khrustalev ◽  
P. V. Petrovskii ◽  
M. P. Pasechnik ◽  
...  

1981 ◽  
Vol 36 (10) ◽  
pp. 1208-1210 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hartmut Köpf ◽  
Joachim Pickardt

Abstract The molecular structure of the bridged [1]-titanocenophane 1,1'-dimethylsilylene titanocene dichloride, (CH3)2Si(C5H4)2TiCl2, has been investigated by an X-ray structure determination. Crystal data: monoclinic, space group C2/c, Z = 4, a = 1332.9(3), 6 = 988.7(3), c = 1068.9(3) pm, β = 113.43(2)°. The results are compared with the structural dimensions of similar compounds: 1,1'-methylene titanocene dichloride, CH2(C5H4)TiCl2, with the unbridged titanocene dichloride, (C5H5)2TiCl2 and the ethylene-bridged compound (CH2)2(C5H4)2TiCl2


Molecules ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (12) ◽  
pp. 2778
Author(s):  
Joseph R. Lane ◽  
Graham C. Saunders

The crystal structure of 4-(2,3,5,6-tetrafluoropyridyl)diphenylphosphine oxide (1) contains two independent molecules in the asymmetric unit. Although the molecules are virtually identical in all other aspects, the P=O bond distances differ by ca. 0.02 Å. In contrast, although tris(pentafluorophenyl)phosphine oxide (2) has a similar crystal structure, the P=O bond distances of the two independent molecules are identical. To investigate the reason for the difference, a density functional theory study was undertaken. Both structures comprise chains of molecules. The attraction between molecules of 1, which comprises lone pair–π, weak hydrogen bonding and C–H∙∙∙arene interactions, has energies of 70 and 71 kJ mol−1. The attraction between molecules of 2 comprises two lone pair–π interactions, and has energies of 99 and 100 kJ mol−1. There is weak hydrogen bonding between molecules of adjacent chains involving the oxygen atom of 1. For one molecule, this interaction is with a symmetry independent molecule, whereas for the other, it also occurs with a symmetry related molecule. This provides a reason for the difference in P=O distance. This interaction is not possible for 2, and so there is no difference between the P=O distances of 2.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document