scholarly journals A semantic-web oriented representation of the clinical element model for secondary use of electronic health records data

2012 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 554-562 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cui Tao ◽  
Guoqian Jiang ◽  
Thomas A Oniki ◽  
Robert R Freimuth ◽  
Qian Zhu ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
E.D. Farrand ◽  
O. Gologorskaya ◽  
H. Mills ◽  
L. Radhakrishnan ◽  
H.R. Collard ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 205520761880465 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tim Robbins ◽  
Sarah N Lim Choi Keung ◽  
Sailesh Sankar ◽  
Harpal Randeva ◽  
Theodoros N Arvanitis

Introduction Electronic health records provide an unparalleled opportunity for the use of patient data that is routinely collected and stored, in order to drive research and develop an epidemiological understanding of disease. Diabetes, in particular, stands to benefit, being a data-rich, chronic-disease state. This article aims to provide an understanding of the extent to which the healthcare sector is using routinely collected and stored data to inform research and epidemiological understanding of diabetes mellitus. Methods Narrative literature review of articles, published in both the medical- and engineering-based informatics literature. Results There has been a significant increase in the number of papers published, which utilise electronic health records as a direct data source for diabetes research. These articles consider a diverse range of research questions. Internationally, the secondary use of electronic health records, as a research tool, is most prominent in the USA. The barriers most commonly described in research studies include missing values and misclassification, alongside challenges of establishing the generalisability of results. Discussion Electronic health record research is an important and expanding area of healthcare research. Much of the research output remains in the form of conference abstracts and proceedings, rather than journal articles. There is enormous opportunity within the United Kingdom to develop these research methodologies, due to national patient identifiers. Such a healthcare context may enable UK researchers to overcome many of the barriers encountered elsewhere and thus to truly unlock the potential of electronic health records.


2013 ◽  
Vol 46 (5) ◽  
pp. 830-836 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole G. Weiskopf ◽  
George Hripcsak ◽  
Sushmita Swaminathan ◽  
Chunhua Weng

2018 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 144-151
Author(s):  
Antti Vikström ◽  
Hans Moen ◽  
Sanaz Rahimi Moosavi ◽  
Tapio Salakoski ◽  
Sanna Salanterä

Background: The potential for the secondary use of electronic health records (EHRs) is underused due to restrictions in national legislation. For privacy purposes, legislative restrictions limit the availability and content of EHR data provided to secondary users. These limitations do not encourage healthcare organisations to develop procedures to promote the secondary use of EHRs. Objective: The objective of this study is to identify factors that restrict the secondary use of unstructured EHRs in academic research in Finland and Sweden. Method: A study was conducted to identify these availability-restricting issues that pertain to the academic secondary use of unstructured EHRs. Using semi-structured interviews, 14 domain experts in science, hospital management and business were interviewed to evaluate the efficiency of procedures and technologies that are implemented in secondary use processes. Results: The results demonstrate three aspects that restrict the availability of unstructured EHRs for secondary purposes: (i) the management and (ii) privacy preservation of such data as well as (iii) potential secondary users. Conclusion: Based on these categories, two approaches for the secondary use of unstructured EHRs are identified: the protected processing environment and altered data. Implications: The protected processing environment ensures patient privacy by providing unstructured EHRs for exclusive user groups that have preferred use intentions. Compared to the use of such processing environments, data alteration enables the secondary use of unstructured EHRs for a larger user group with various use intentions but that yield less valuable content.


Healthcare ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 1648
Author(s):  
Samar Binkheder ◽  
Mohammed Ahmed Asiri ◽  
Khaled Waleed Altowayan ◽  
Turki Mohammed Alshehri ◽  
Mashhour Faleh Alzarie ◽  
...  

Despite the importance of electronic health records data, less attention has been given to data quality. This study aimed to evaluate the quality of COVID-19 patients’ records and their readiness for secondary use. We conducted a retrospective chart review study of all COVID-19 inpatients in an academic healthcare hospital for the year 2020, which were identified using ICD-10 codes and case definition guidelines. COVID-19 signs and symptoms were higher in unstructured clinical notes than in structured coded data. COVID-19 cases were categorized as 218 (66.46%) “confirmed cases”, 10 (3.05%) “probable cases”, 9 (2.74%) “suspected cases”, and 91 (27.74%) “no sufficient evidence”. The identification of “probable cases” and “suspected cases” was more challenging than “confirmed cases” where laboratory confirmation was sufficient. The accuracy of the COVID-19 case identification was higher in laboratory tests than in ICD-10 codes. When validating using laboratory results, we found that ICD-10 codes were inaccurately assigned to 238 (72.56%) patients’ records. “No sufficient evidence” records might indicate inaccurate and incomplete EHR data. Data quality evaluation should be incorporated to ensure patient safety and data readiness for secondary use research and predictive analytics. We encourage educational and training efforts to motivate healthcare providers regarding the importance of accurate documentation at the point-of-care.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document